- Joined
- Feb 26, 2007
- Messages
- 10,518
- Location
- Tennessee
You can't have it both ways. Now have they done major changes to the Ducati or have they not? If not, then it is essentially the same bike as Stoner rode to race wins last year and therefore is a winning package. If they have done major changes then WTF, isn't Rossi the best developer in the known universe so how can the bike be worse?
As far as the Honda goes, I firmly believe that if Stoner was not riding it then Pedrosa would still be trying to fix it. But since Stoner started whipping the arse of the other long term Honda riders on their bike they have pulled their finger out and got on with it. This is at least part of the reason the Honda is looking so good. Perhaps the Honda has been this good for a long time the riders just weren't capitalising on it because they were trying to make it perfect instead of just riding the F'ing thing. Also Stoner has brought team work into the Honda pit and this is dragging the Honda forward rather than it all being about Pedrosa. If you say that the Honda would still be as good as it appears then you are suggesting that Stoner has had ZERO impact at Honda and that would be plain ignorant.
So you can not say with out it being pure speculation that the Honda would be as good as it is now and also that Stoner would not have been able to win on the Ducati when the evidence suggests that Stoner can win on the Ducati without it being the best or even second best bike on the grid.
So if you and Talpa are happy that Rossi coming 3rd (gifted but really 5th) is a stella performance then good on you. But from the comments of others above you are probably close to being on your own.
Agree,Dani's comfort zone is small and he was always searching for the perfect setup, something that never happens on a motorcycle. Stoner has shown Dani that being fast is good enough, then its up to the rider.