<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Oct 19 2009, 05:50 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Isn't it funny that no one even thinks to question the legitimacy of Vale's title this season (should he win it)? The thought really hasn't ever crossed my mind, and yet Casey has beaten Vale in the last two rounds. As an academic exercise, I just want to ask whether or not this title is legitimate given Casey's absence. If you are a reasonable person the only correct conclusion is that Stoner is responsible for his own fitness and Vale's potential championship is legitimate, but where's the fun in that?
Overall, the Stoner controversy has been ludicrous and it wouldn't bother me so much if it weren't intentional created by the media and predicated on needling Stoner in order to get a reaction that will sell papers and generate website hits (i.e. he's lost respect for Schwantz). I almost get the feeling that the racing journos are deeply offended that he would just disappear without throwing them a bone during his hiatus. Since the journos had no facts they just started making things up and asking for unqualified opinions. Upon Stoner's return the press appeared to behave in a vindictive manner, but thankfully Stoner's performance on track always seems to silence his critics.
I understand he is not well liked, but I do get the impression that the press are conspiring against him. It also seems like everyone but Livio is perfectly content to sit back and watch it happen. Why was Schwantz throwing in his two cents, and why did the stooges at Marlboro publicly demand an apology? People say dumb things, but people seem to say an awful lot of dumb things about Casey Stoner. First, Casey was only winning b/c of the Ducati. That was changed to Casey only wins b/c of Bridgestone (even Vale said that). It was also widely theorized that Casey stopped crashing in 2008 because the electronics were keeping him upright. I think there were also a few theories about Ducati's electronics being the source of Casey's pace.
I can't pretend that I haven't subscribed to any of the ludicrous theories (I think everyone knows how much I love seemingly ludicrous theories), but time after time the lunacy has been disproved by Stoner himself. It makes you wonder why the press continues to fabricate myths about him and then peddle them to the public. I guess it must be b/c the public is STILL gullible enough to believe them.
i think a lot of people fell for these stoner theories, especially us Rossi fans, although 2007 there is no doubt the Duke had a massive starightline speed advantage which took a lot of points away from rossi. but since then i think Stoner has proved himself to be one of the 4 aliens!
he has definately earnt my respect and fear of him beating vale
the electronics are overly complicated at the moment , i think this is hugely why there is such a gap between factory and satellite bikes, i think most of the electronics should be taken off and we would get more entertainment!
back to the race, Stoner and Rossi were a league apart, i was dissapointed with rossi and a little surprised he didnt turn his brain off and let his instinct to win take over, but then he did do the right thing i guess by not risking too much, but you can bet your ... if the title was between him and stoner he would have won that race one way or another.
poor Dani tho to be beaten by that much! Hayden is having a cracked dark mirror version of 2006