<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Jun 23 2009, 03:14 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>
Right into my trap with a smile on your face.
When Hacking is dismissed from Kawasaki later this season, I will get to gloat for no apparent reason other than because you told me that results are everything.
Hacking is only good enough for 2 rounds.
So this is what it feels like to be Migs.
Ok, so Hacking is only good for two round? Uhm, newsflash, in one of the Monza races he beat Parks, that is at a track he'd never seen. The second race his bike would not start, they actually push started it at the line for the sighting lap. Realiable? They know he's better than the regular guy they have been struggling with, hence the invitation to return to Europe. Feel free to clean your computer screen every now and then, I think you're missing alot when you read the results.
When Kawasaki look at their season, and they ask what was our high water mark in results, thus far they have Hacking to thank. Of course in your convoluted world, that means they look down on such an effort. Ah Lex, no wonder why all your rants on politics are insideout/upside down of reality, its that fuzzy math you boys are use to where 2+2=3. Kawasaki is below BMW in constructors results, you don't think results mean anything to this team? Hacking scores them some decent results at Miller, and all you see was the second race where he pushed the bike to the limit causing a few mistakes, but its this very thing that impressed them, what you call "embarrassing". In Monza, Hacking ran in the top 5 (2nd for a moment) that is until his team fell asleep and didn't get him in to change bikes. Otherwise they would have been in a good position to get excellent results. Ah, but that was Hacking fault, right Lex? Get a clue.