This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Can Rossi beat Lorenzo at least once in a Race or Qualifying this season?

Can Rossi beat Lorenzo at least once in a Race or Qualifying this season?

  • yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • no

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Arrabbiata1
3534631370935942

Very well constructed post and already dissected by Jum.

 

I agree with much of what you say but had to take exception to this - it was hardly a 'simple compound change' that crippled the Honda's last season. It was a last minute major alteration to the carcass itself which became much softer and easier to get heat into. The solution in the event for HRC, was funnily enough a 'simple' one - but wasn't forthcoming until Laguna in the wake of innumerable chassis revisions.

 

Also Jum, I disagree that the proverbial JB 'rabbit out of the hat' on race day was solely down to SNS' and an auspicious DHL delivery from Clermont Ferrand on a Sunday morning . As I mentioned in the Bautista thread, it owed as much to systematic elimination - even serendipitous experimentation during morning warm up..and sometimes even a change in the weather. There are huge interrelated variables, often in flux, and constantly exerting influence throughout a race weekend - in respect of that, let's give Alex Briggs and Brent Stephens their due too.  When we learned that the garage had 'found' something it didn't always mean a large package on a sack barrow at the back of the garagemarked for the attention of Mr Rossi and Mr.Burgess .


Before i get to this.......Good points Jum, whilst I don't agree with everything, it's a nice debate. Best on the best......sometimes winning also means being the best at ordering the best.....


Arrib, I was simply highlighting the fact that in 2012 Stoner suffered a compound change, whilst significant it was hardly on par with the removal of the SNSs or the decrease in the fuel limit.


Honda throwing chassis at the problem last year soon fixed it as they went on to dominate the last half of the season. This really emphasizes the horrible reality of the tiny performance envelope that now exists and the regs that strangle anyone who doesn't fit the mould-so to speak. Rossi is a product of an era that demanded flexibility in setup with many different methods to acheive success......with more than two race tyre options :O,race fuel options, even race management options controlled by the rider. This is all probably handled now with a tablet and an app.....it's a long season and its not over, but it's getting harder and harder for the old boys
 
Kropotkin
3534661370947912

Given that Mr Stoner has spent the last few months in the US, due to the Australian tax authorities taking a surprisingly keen interest in his business affairs, this argument would appear not to hold water.


Stoner hated the GP paddock. It really was as simple as that.


We have great family fishing here
 
Talpa
3534741370950419

Before i get to this.......Good points Jum, whilst I don't agree with everything, it's a nice debate. Best on the best......sometimes winning also means being the best at ordering the best.....


Arrib, I was simply highlighting the fact that in 2012 Stoner suffered a compound change, whilst significant it was hardly on par with the removal of the SNSs or the decrease in the fuel limit.


Honda throwing chassis at the problem last year soon fixed it as they went on to dominate the last half of the season. This really emphasizes the horrible reality of the tiny performance envelope that now exists and the regs that strangle anyone who doesn't fit the mould-so to speak. Rossi is a product of an era that demanded flexibility in setup with many different methods to acheive success......with more than two race tyre options :eek:,race fuel options, even race management options controlled by the rider. This is all probably handled now with a tablet and an app.....it's a long season and its not over, but it's getting harder and harder for the old boys


......and between 2002 & 2003, a motorcylce that worked every weekend straight out of the crate!
 
JohnnyKnockdown
3534551370919470

All all of you ignorant or just not paying attention.  


A. Stoner didnt retire.  He quit and joined another series.


B. Your point that he left GP to raise a family and go fishing is moot when he traded one job for another.


I know you keep grasping for excuses because none of the others made any sense other then to portray him as a weak minded quitter.


 


C. Keshav you used words like self fulfilled and happy.  A self fuffilled, happy person doesnt go around tossing barbs at his past and present competitors.  


D. Maybe you got the wrong Aussie because the only one I see in that position is Bayliss.


You are mistaken that you think he has let down people like me who are fans. Im glad the little .......... is gone.  If hes not happy riding the silver platter handed him then the ungrateful .... should .... off.  I would much rather a guy with passion tool around in last place


then see a mega talent with no heart like Casey Gobert rail at the unfair world that has placed him on the best motorcycle on the planet.


A. Stoner retired from MotoGP. Not from competitive sport.


B. So you would like to believe


C. Perhaps you would be in a better position to make this call if you were fulfilled?


D. Bayliss expressed in interviews that he would really love to race more - but is held back from doing do by promises made to the wife.


D. Handed to him? Really? You mean to say he didn't earn it by being the best, and proving it by consistently beating Rossi, Dani and Lorenzo on an inferior bike? Dude! It's a motorcycle. Riding it was his job. He did his job, collected his gold watch, and moved on to live a life that was more satisfying. Get over it.
 
I'm completely with Pete and JK on this. As a Stoner fan, I'm highly dissappointed that he disregarded my feelings and just pissed off to enjoy his life. He left me with deep feeling of regret, now that I will never find out how things would have been if he had stayed around past his prime. Now I'm left just believing that he was the most talented and spectacular rider out there, and probably the best. He has given me nothing to work with in order to make some downward revisions to these perceptions. ........ Also, I think it's an outright affront to the fundamental values of (semi)capitalist societies to just turn down a paycheck. I mean losing passion for the sport is all well and good, but if you walk away from the kind of money he could have earned, you must just be ungrateful.


No, Stoner could learn a lot from Rossi here.

When Yamaha asked him to accept less than his championship-winning team mate, he said '.... you' and took the most that the market had to offer. Despite probably being a catholic, he truly showed the spirit of capitalism.

When people were starting to doubt whether he could perform well on a less than perfect bike, he went out there and proofed to them that he couldn't.

When people were arguing whether his nemesis was really a worse rider than him or simply handicapped by a ...... bike, he invested two years of his life to make it completely and utterly obvious that it was down to the ...... bike.

When people were clinging on to the belief that he and his team were a great developers, he made sure to make such a chaotic clusterfuck of development on his new bike, that this illusion was well and truly shattered.

When being manouvred back onto a championship-winning bike despite finishing sixth in standings, he thought of his fans and accepted this treatment so he could give them something to cheer about, rather than decline out of some weird considerations for fairness.


Yes, truly, Stoner could learn a lot from Rossi. Ungrateful ........
 
stiefel
3534891370962557

I'm completely with Pete and JK on this. As a Stoner fan, I'm highly dissappointed that he disregarded my feelings and just pissed off to enjoy his life. He left me with deep feeling of regret, now that I will never find out how things would have been if he had stayed around past his prime. Now I'm left just believing that he was the most talented and spectacular rider out there, and probably the best. He has given me nothing to work with in order to make some downward revisions to these perceptions. ........ Also, I think it's an outright affront to the fundamental values of (semi)capitalist societies to just turn down a paycheck. I mean losing passion for the sport is all well and good, but if you walk away from the kind of money he could have earned, you must just be ungrateful.


No, Stoner could learn a lot from Rossi here.

When Yamaha asked him to accept less than his championship-winning team mate, he said '.... you' and took the most that the market had to offer. Despite probably being a catholic, he truly showed the spirit of capitalism.

When people were starting to doubt whether he could perform well on a less than perfect bike, he went out there and proofed to them that he couldn't.

When people were arguing whether his nemesis was really a worse rider than him or simply handicapped by a ...... bike, he invested two years of his life to make it completely and utterly obvious that it was down to the ...... bike.

When people were clinging on to the belief that he and his team were a great developers, he made sure to make such a chaotic clusterfuck of development on his new bike, that this illusion was well and truly shattered.

When being manouvred back onto a championship-winning bike despite finishing sixth in standings, he thought of his fans and accepted this treatment so he could give them something to cheer about, rather than decline out of some weird considerations for fairness.


Yes, truly, Stoner could learn a lot from Rossi. Ungrateful ........


Bravo! :clap:
 
Big Jorge
3537921371307464

Rossi missed an opportunity today with Jorge using his 2nd bike.


For Rossi to have any real chance Jorge would have to be using his push bike
 
Rossi is my boy but he really needs to call it a day and either retire or go win a WSBK title. Let Cal have that ride.
 
bluegreen
3538061371323632

Rossi is my boy but he really needs to call it a day and either retire or go win a WSBK title. Let Cal have that ride.


 


i dont agree at all, i think rossi needs a new crew, he sets and ok time just like yesterday then when everyone improves he does not, this is happening alot and i believe his crew are not setting up his machine that he can push right to the limit.


 


most will dissagree, this isnt me looking for excuses but i think this is a big part of the problem.
 
jazkat
3538111371327180

i dont agree at all, i think rossi needs a new crew, he sets and ok time just like yesterday then when everyone improves he does not, this is happening alot and i believe his crew are not setting up his machine that he can push right to the limit.
 
most will dissagree, this isnt me looking for excuses but i think this is a big part of the problem.
I think it has more to do with who he's up against. Pedrosa and Lorenzo are both guys that keep something in reserve throught the practice session, chipping away methodologically on race set-up without trying to set a lap record each time they are out. Marquez is still on his learning curve. So Rossi can keep with it early in the weekend, until Pedrosa and Lorenzo reveal their true pace between qp and the race. If Stoner would still be in among the pack, you'd proably get a more realistic picture of what Rossi is up against earlier in the weekend.
 
check his analysis' over the entire weekend. he is running quite good times, not just one offs. his strings of laps are only just behind jorge and dani. if he can get past the mid pack .... without being nailed again, i predict he will podium it.


still wont beat lorenzo though :)
 
jazkat
3538111371327180

i dont agree at all, i think rossi needs a new crew, he sets and ok time just like yesterday then when everyone improves he does not, this is happening alot and i believe his crew are not setting up his machine that he can push right to the limit.


 


most will dissagree, this isnt me looking for excuses but i think this is a big part of the problem.


I tend to agree, maybe the new technology has passed JB (who started with bikes with carburettors and building different engines for different circuits) by, with the IT guys on their laptops now seeming increasingly to be the most important in the crew.
 
michaelm
3538261371347109

I tend to agree, maybe the new technology has passed JB (who started with bikes with carburettors and building different engines for different circuits) by, with the IT guys on their laptops now seeming increasingly to be the most important in the crew.


JB is sixty now, and Rossi is only losing 3 tenths to Jorge on a quick lap this weekend.....not too bad.


You may be right though, time has moved on for that garage, yesterday Rossi has stated that he can't brake any later without missing corner entry, electronics perhaps?
 
Listen I want Rossi to win, but I'm just not sure it's gonna happen baring a crash(s) in front or some perfect storm. As for his Friday results vs. the weekend I put that down to the massive amount of experience he has at these circuits. On Friday he knows where to brake, turn, pin it etc. he's almost at his limit right from the get go where as Dani, Lorenzo, Cal and Marc in particular are still pushing their limits and have more in the tank and still have a bit to learn every lap. They are still pushing the envelope. Rossi's days of that are pretty much over. Maybe time has passed JB by more than Vale, I'm certainly not an expert and Vale still has a little bit more. But things don't look good.
 
Kropotkin
3534661370947912

Given that Mr Stoner has spent the last few months in the US, due to the Australian tax authorities taking a surprisingly keen interest in his business affairs, this argument would appear not to hold water.Stoner hated the GP paddock. It really was as simple as that.


That he's in the US is no secret, but any evidence/link for the tax investigation allegation?
 

Recent Discussions