3495191366918952
Next you will be telling us that Levi thinks Johnny Rea is no good
3495181366918792
Take some more tablets and go to sleep .......
3494721366844945
I'm still not one-hundred percent...
PERSPECTIVE!
3494721366844945
1. Cal should send the designers of Qatar and COTA flowers; whom had F1 in mind when they designed it, providing the run-off possible for Cal to finished both these races in one piece; OTHERWISE, we would be talking 2 for 2 (100%) DNFs to start the season! I replied to somebody who said GP should avoid F1 tracks, well, if Cal has scrutinized his performance, I doubt he would make the same conclusion. I'm thinking he should be praying for F1 tracks, that is until he can figure out how not make mistakes on braking (a generally accepted Yamaha strength). This is a carry over of the last two years, Cal is NOT a relatively "new comer" in this regard, not to the series, not to this bike.
3494721366844945
2. Cal should send Ducati flowers. Cal on a Ducati would have been relegated to finish behind Dovi and ahead of injured Spies, and the increased interest in his career would have been in the exact opposite direction. Cal deserves praise for beating Rossi, who just came off a horrible performance at Ducati, but he had a brake issue at COTA riding on Spies' bike (so it seems). Cal should expect to be behind VR regularly once in Europe, and passed with relative ease as he did so at Qatar.
3494721366844945
3. Cal should send Bradley flowers. Why have Pedro, Hayden, and Rossi seemed deserving of castigation, criticism, and general disapproval? The answer is, because they have been handed their ..... by their teammate. Lets shelve the fact that Cal would have been sitting on a Ducati had he got what he made abundantly public he wanted; but the best measure for us to ascribe significance to his performance for comparison is gone! We now have Bradley Smith as his teammate (sitting in the standing below all 4 .... Ducatis, even a guy with a bum wing AND a couple of CRTs) who is getting beat by DuCRT and proper CRTs in races he finishes. Given his teammate is far inferior in performance, we are forced to SPECULATE just how “inferior” his M1 is to the factory M1s. That speculation has been inclined to give Cal all the benefit of the doubt (and rightly so, but the magnitude may be debatable). That Cal is beating his teammate is hardly cause for kudos (sorry to my Brit friends, but the kid, as likeable as he is, simply is being out classed). Which brings me to the next and probably most important point of all regarding PERSPECTIVE.
3494721366844945
4. Cal should send Andrea Dovizioso flowers. Just how impressive would Cal’s performance be if he had Dovi as his teammate? Well, Dovi is now at Ducati; notwithstanding, this is the man who was responsible for flustering Rossi in Qatar AND finished one position behind Rossi at COTA. This, on a bike that Rossi declared repeatedly (where his followers echoed in stereo) was a machine ‘un-rideable’! I can sure you, if Cal had a massively inferior bike to the factory’s, he would be telling us at every opportunity! People are still speculating if he has a 2012 spec M1 engine/bike, where he already tweeted last round that he has the same lump as Lorenzo & Rossi. He also mentioned after Qatar, he messed with the mapping, lowering the power, finishing the race with a measure of fuel reserve (where as Rossi ran out) which may have affected the outcome. Anyway, the point being this, who here believes if Dovi had remained Cal’s teammate, that Cal would have beat him both rounds? If Dovi finishes ahead of Cal, in your minds eye, then who is ready to demand Cal get “factory” support?
3494721366844945
5. HRC 2nd seat: I completely agree with your take about Cal or anybody of his ability (which means a few riders) deserving to get Pedro's seat. The midget has done .... all with it, and he's been given every opportunity. Its time for a change. If they go after Cal to replace Pedrobot, I'm all for it. At this point it would be something like a lateral move, with the ADVANTAGE that Cal (who has had plenty of practice falling the last two years) has proven to be gritty and won't break apart like a fragile china doll that is Pedrosa.
3495391366925117
Just for that little outburst. Here you go, enjoy.
I called in sick to go to the AustinGP, now Im here at work sick as a dog (easy Barry) with no sick days to call upon. Did you know that if you take too much NyQuil and sleep for 13 hours, you will still wake up tired!? Yeah, its true.
Allow me to rebut a few of my points I made earlier (Edit, I started this post sitting in the ....... this morning). Yes, I will debate myself, blame it on the effects of a cocktail combination of Zicam, Advil, NyQuil, and my wifes attempt to make Indian curry for the first time in honor of my Brit friends who brought baring gifts. It was here first attempt.I start this post from the toilet. She is determined to learn how to make the British National Cuisine to offer you guys on the next visit to Casa Jumkie (I love this women, but her first attempt at vindaloonot so much).
PERSPECTIVE! Though seeking perspective is always a great way to analyze context for what might be nothing ever replaces what is. And the FACT is that Cal has been fast, zero DNFs.
Rebuttal: Yes, the extra run-off was designed to allow the F1 cars to get back on track and keep the action going rather than seeing a zillion dollar car (and its zillion sponsors) eliminated prematurely. But its actually this run-off that allows for the riders of MotoGP to take an additional margin of risk! They brake even deeper than normally and take more risks (a characteristic of these circuits that Stoner was vocal in explaining was a double edged sword). If they knew that beyond the curbing was waiting for them a DNF inducing visit to gravel and possible injury, they might not brake as late. The down side might be we wouldnt witness the amazing uttermost edge of limits to get a GP machine stopped from such awesome speeds. Its quite possible Cal would have not broke so late in these corners if there wasnt any run-off, where he elected to do so knowing that a minor mistake might not cost him a crash (and or the loss of much track position, which is precisely what happened). It may have been Cal's calculated risk, which if you look at it this way, wasnt so bad. I would rather see the man take the risk of attempted passing than sitting behind the guy as he did much of last year, at COTA he seemed more determined to pass than he did at Qatar, this is progress! There may be some evidence here that he has considered his previous crashing propensities of the last two years, the FACT is, he did NOT crash out these two rounds, and finished both races in the top 5 (4th at COTA ahead of one full factory bike, with the caveat that there may have been a braking issues on said bike). But we generally dont give two ..... about mechanicals, we only care about results (ask Ben Spies).
Rebuttal: There is absolutely no precedence to think any talented rider other than Stoner could ride the DucatiGP to victory, HOWEVER, speculating Cal could not ride it is simply SPECULATION (its has less substance than a fart in the wind). Even though we should easily accept the probability of 99.99999 to 0.00001 that Cal would suffer the same fate as others, even still, we would NOT know for certain until what if he tried happened. We briefly had this conversation at Austin, Lil Red assured me the odds wouldnt be so bleak, so Id be willing to revise them to somewhere between 99.9 to 0.01. The FACT is Cal is NOT riding a DucatiGP. So speculation is simply that. Here we must defer to his performance on what he IS riding.
Rebuttal: In the spirit of staying with FACTS and not speculation, Dovi is handing Nicky his ...: Fact (much to my chagrin), Lorenzo to Rossi: Fact (much to my delight), Marcky to Pedro: fact (much to Kropos delight), and Cal is handing ... to Bradley: FACT (much to British internal discord perhaps leading to wishful rationalization) yet, its still an undisputable fact. We can talk all day about the merits of either Bradley (or Cals) promotion into the première class, regardless, the fact is they are here, and both are on podium worthy competitive bikes (quite similar to the Marquez vs Pedrosa dynamic if you think about it). Where its reasonable to give a rookie a pass, the magnitude in deferential performance within the Tech3 & HRC teams indicates that Cal is exceeding expectation (lets shelf the idea that Marq is construed a freak. I personally dont rate Pedro comparatively and Im more inclined to say its an apples to apples comparative of rookie vs veteran. I would argue Pedros record has led most to believe he is better than he really is, remembering his entire stint spent at HRC, a 1st tier--in a parity challenged seriesbut lets not get off on a tangent).
Rebuttal: The entire point here is based on the assumption that Dovi would be beating Cal in the first two rounds. I think it would be a fairly acceptable assumption based on the last few races of last year, where Cal finished the season with a string of DNFs. But in the interest of presenting a few facts, here is one, he did have a podium near the end of the season. If we are going to make assumptions, then its equally valid and fair to make the assumption that perhaps the taste of podium clicked something inside Cal. Perhaps Cal has turned the corner and realized crashing is exceedingly detrimental to his points classification, where over the off-season just maybe he vowed this would be Big Change #1. What about the assumption of who might be faster this season between Cal & Dovi? Without the time consuming exercise of going back and checking, Ill assume here that Cal was much closer to the front of the pack during this pre-season testing than he was last years pre-season, backed up by the fact he topped the charts at some point. It was rather sensational news when Cal topped the test charts (as it was when Rossi was back on top).
Rebuttal: I have no rebuttal. Pedro should be replaced immediately and without further delay. Other than Rossi at Ducati, no other manufacture has been so fixated and absolute in their unconditional willingness to create a prototype machine around its rider. In addition, UNLIKE Rossi at Ducati, HRC actually possessed the overwhelming means, technical juggernaut, and colossal influence and lobbying more akin to duress on the sport to execute their ambitions! This point cannot be understated; it even surpasses the desperate attempt by Ducati to catapult Rossi, where within two years they did the unthinkable and attempted to build a twin-spar DucatiGP. Even with the aid of the league to tweak the testing rules, tires (allegedly) and whatever we were not privy behind the scenes, it still required a spectacular bailout back to a top tier machine resulting in a 1:4 chance at contention for VR--the GP rider (as has been calculated). Pedro has had no such hiccup, and has been on top tier package uninterrupted his entire GP career. How this did not produce at very least one solitary Big Boy title is shocking if you consider the overwhelming and exclusive odds in his favor; and quite the pig elephant in the room when we consider his MotoGP career thus far. When the spectators and league are ready to crucify Ben Spies for one underperforming year after a googol (pronounced Google--BJC, who declared Bens injuries and mechanicals as just excuses), then Id say Pedro has had 6x the opportunities and then some. Many of Pedros injuries have come by way of self-inflicted crashes or devious hurry-ups by Alberto Puig, who again just this last race at COTA purposefully fed Pedro a bogus lap count pit-board. This, reminiscent of the bogus pit-board which was spectacularly followed by a crash and a broken wing ending his title challenge (where was it, Germany I think). So I stand by my point, I think if HRC wanted to replace Pedro with Cal or any other top rider, then Id applaud the move. God knows they wouldnt shatter into tiny ....-bits, and even if they did break a few bones, at very least Cal has proven he could buck up for the occasion, as he did in his home GP.
Good night Yall. :....:
3495391366925117
Just for that little outburst. Here you go, enjoy.
I called in sick to go to the AustinGP, now I’m here at work sick as a dog (easy Barry) with no sick days to call upon. Did you know that if you take too much NyQuil and sleep for 13 hours, you will still wake up tired!? Yeah, its true.
Allow me to rebut a few of my points I made earlier (Edit, I started this post sitting in the ....... this morning). Yes, I will debate myself, blame it on the effects of a cocktail combination of Zicam, Advil, NyQuil, and my wife’s attempt to make Indian curry for the first time in honor of my Brit friends who brought baring gifts. It was here first attempt….I start this post from the toilet. She is determined to learn how to make the British National Cuisine to offer you guys on the next visit to Casa Jumkie (I love this women, but her first attempt at ‘vindaloo’…not so much).
PERSPECTIVE! Seeking context for that all important “perspective” is always important to analyze ‘what could be’ nothing ever replaces ‘what is.’ And the FACT ‘is’ that Cal has been fast with zero DNFs.
Rebuttal: Yes, the extra run-off was designed to allow the F1 cars to get back on track and keep the action going rather than seeing a zillion dollar car (and its zillion sponsors) eliminated prematurely. But its actually this run-off that allows for the riders of MotoGP to take an additional margin of risk! They brake even deeper than normally and take more risks (a characteristic of these circuits that Stoner was vocal in explaining was a double edged sword). If they knew that beyond the curbing was waiting for them a DNF inducing visit to gravel and possible injury, they might not brake as late. The down side might be we wouldn’t witness the amazing uttermost edge of limits to get a GP machine stopped from such awesome speeds. Its quite possible Cal would have not broke so late in these corners if there wasn’t any run-off, where he elected to do so knowing that a minor mistake might not cost him a crash (and or the loss of much track position, which is precisely what happened). It may have been Cal's calculated risk, which if you look at it this way, wasn’t so bad. I would rather see the man take the risk of attempted passing than sitting behind the guy as he did much of last year, at COTA he seemed more determined to pass than he did at Qatar, this is progress! There may be some evidence here that he has considered his previous crashing propensities of the last two years, the FACT is, he did NOT crash out these two rounds, and finished both races in the top 5 (4th at COTA ahead of one full factory bike, with the caveat that there may have been a braking issues on said bike). But we generally don’t give two ..... about mechanicals, we only care about results (ask Ben Spies).
Rebuttal: There is absolutely no precedence to think any talented rider other than Stoner could ride the DucatiGP to victory, HOWEVER, speculating Cal could not ride it is simply SPECULATION (its has less substance than a fart in the wind). Even though we should easily accept the probability of 99.99999 to 0.00001 that Cal would suffer the same fate as others, even still, we would NOT know for certain until “what if he tried” happened. We briefly had this conversation at Austin, Lil Red assured me the odds wouldn’t be so bleak, so I’d be willing to revise them to somewhere between 99.9 to 0.01. The FACT is Cal is NOT riding a DucatiGP. So speculation is simply that. Here we must defer to his performance on what he IS riding.
Rebuttal: In the spirit of staying with FACTS and not speculation, Dovi is handing Nicky his ...: Fact (much to my chagrin), Lorenzo to Rossi: Fact (much to my delight), Marcky to Pedro: fact (much to Kropos delight), and Cal is handing ... to Bradley: FACT (much to British internal discord perhaps leading to wishful rationalization) yet, its still an undisputable fact. We can talk all day about the merits of either Bradley (or Cal’s) promotion into the première class, regardless, the fact is they are here, and both are on podium worthy competitive bikes (quite similar to the Marquez vs Pedrosa dynamic if you think about it). Where its reasonable to give a rookie a pass, the magnitude in deferential performance within the Tech3 & HRC teams indicates that Cal is exceeding expectation (lets shelf the idea that Marq is construed a freak. I personally don’t rate Pedro ‘comparatively’ and I’m more inclined to say it’s an ‘apples to apples’ comparative of rookie vs veteran. I would argue Pedro’s record has led most to believe he is better than he really is, remembering his entire stint spent at HRC, a 1st tier--in a parity challenged series…but lets not get off on a tangent).
Rebuttal: The entire point here is based on the ‘assumption’ that Dovi would be beating Cal in the first two rounds. I think it would be a fairly acceptable assumption based on the last few races of last year, where Cal finished the season with a string of DNFs. But in the interest of presenting a few facts, here is one, he did have a podium near the end of the season. If we are going to make assumptions, then its equally valid and fair to make the assumption that perhaps the taste of podium clicked something inside Cal. Perhaps Cal has turned the corner and realized crashing is exceedingly detrimental to his points classification, where over the off-season just maybe he vowed this would be Big Change #1. What about the assumption of who might be faster this season between Cal & Dovi? Without the time consuming exercise of going back and checking, I’ll assume here that Cal was much closer to the front of the pack during this pre-season testing than he was last year’s pre-season, backed up by the fact he topped the charts at some point. It was rather sensational news when Cal topped the test charts (as it was when Rossi ‘was back’ on top).
Rebuttal: I have no rebuttal. Pedro should be replaced immediately and without further delay. Other than Rossi at Ducati, no other manufacture has been so fixated and absolute in their unconditional willingness to create a prototype machine around its rider. In addition, UNLIKE Rossi at Ducati, HRC actually possessed the overwhelming means, technical juggernaut, and colossal influence and lobbying more akin to duress on the sport to execute their ambitions! This point cannot be overstated; it even surpasses the desperate attempt by Ducati to catapult Rossi, where within two years they did the “unthinkable” and attempted to build a ‘twin-spar’ DucatiGP. Even with the aid of the league to tweak the testing rules, tires (allegedly), machine weight rules, and whatever we were not privy behind the scenes, it still required a spectacular bailout back to a top tier machine resulting in a 1:4 chance at contention for VR--the GP rider (as has been calculated). Pedro has had no such hiccup, and has been on top tier package uninterrupted his entire GP career. How this did not produce at very least one solitary Big Boy title is shocking if you consider the overwhelming and exclusive odds in his favor; and quite the puig-elephant in the room when we consider his MotoGP career thus far. When the spectators and league are ready to crucify Ben Spies for one underperforming year after a googol of misfortune (pronounced “Google”--BJC, who declared Ben’s injuries and mechanicals as mere excuses), then I’d say Pedro has had 6x the opportunities and then some. Many of Pedro’s injuries have come by way of self-inflicted crashes or devious “hurry-ups” by Alberto Puig, who again just this last race at COTA purposefully fed Pedro a bogus lap count pit-board. This, reminiscent of the bogus pit-board which was spectacularly followed by a crash and a broken wing ending his title challenge (where was it, Germany I think). So I stand by my point, I think if HRC wanted to replace Pedro with Cal or any other top rider, then I’d applaud the move. God knows they wouldn’t shatter into tiny ....-bits, and even if they did break a few bones, at very least Cal has proven he could buck up for the occasion, as he did in his home GP.
Good night Y’all. :....:
3495391366925117
Just for that little outburst. Here you go, enjoy.
I called in sick to go to the AustinGP, now I’m here at work sick as a dog (easy Barry) with no sick days to call upon. Did you know that if you take too much NyQuil and sleep for 13 hours, you will still wake up tired!? Yeah, its true.
Allow me to rebut a few of my points I made earlier (Edit, I started this post sitting in the ....... this morning). Yes, I will debate myself, blame it on the effects of a cocktail combination of Zicam, Advil, NyQuil, and my wife’s attempt to make Indian curry for the first time in honor of my Brit friends who brought baring gifts. It was here first attempt….I start this post from the toilet. She is determined to learn how to make the British National Cuisine to offer you guys on the next visit to Casa Jumkie (I love this women, but her first attempt at ‘vindaloo’…not so much).
PERSPECTIVE! Seeking context for that all important “perspective” is always important to analyze ‘what could be’ nothing ever replaces ‘what is.’ And the FACT ‘is’ that Cal has been fast with zero DNFs.
Rebuttal: Yes, the extra run-off was designed to allow the F1 cars to get back on track and keep the action going rather than seeing a zillion dollar car (and its zillion sponsors) eliminated prematurely. But its actually this run-off that allows for the riders of MotoGP to take an additional margin of risk! They brake even deeper than normally and take more risks (a characteristic of these circuits that Stoner was vocal in explaining was a double edged sword). If they knew that beyond the curbing was waiting for them a DNF inducing visit to gravel and possible injury, they might not brake as late. The down side might be we wouldn’t witness the amazing uttermost edge of limits to get a GP machine stopped from such awesome speeds. Its quite possible Cal would have not broke so late in these corners if there wasn’t any run-off, where he elected to do so knowing that a minor mistake might not cost him a crash (and or the loss of much track position, which is precisely what happened). It may have been Cal's calculated risk, which if you look at it this way, wasn’t so bad. I would rather see the man take the risk of attempted passing than sitting behind the guy as he did much of last year, at COTA he seemed more determined to pass than he did at Qatar, this is progress! There may be some evidence here that he has considered his previous crashing propensities of the last two years, the FACT is, he did NOT crash out these two rounds, and finished both races in the top 5 (4th at COTA ahead of one full factory bike, with the caveat that there may have been a braking issues on said bike). But we generally don’t give two ..... about mechanicals, we only care about results (ask Ben Spies).
Rebuttal: There is absolutely no precedence to think any talented rider other than Stoner could ride the DucatiGP to victory, HOWEVER, speculating Cal could not ride it is simply SPECULATION (its has less substance than a fart in the wind). Even though we should easily accept the probability of 99.99999 to 0.00001 that Cal would suffer the same fate as others, even still, we would NOT know for certain until “what if he tried” happened. We briefly had this conversation at Austin, Lil Red assured me the odds wouldn’t be so bleak, so I’d be willing to revise them to somewhere between 99.9 to 0.01. The FACT is Cal is NOT riding a DucatiGP. So speculation is simply that. Here we must defer to his performance on what he IS riding.
Rebuttal: In the spirit of staying with FACTS and not speculation, Dovi is handing Nicky his ...: Fact (much to my chagrin), Lorenzo to Rossi: Fact (much to my delight), Marcky to Pedro: fact (much to Kropos delight), and Cal is handing ... to Bradley: FACT (much to British internal discord perhaps leading to wishful rationalization) yet, its still an undisputable fact. We can talk all day about the merits of either Bradley (or Cal’s) promotion into the première class, regardless, the fact is they are here, and both are on podium worthy competitive bikes (quite similar to the Marquez vs Pedrosa dynamic if you think about it). Where its reasonable to give a rookie a pass, the magnitude in deferential performance within the Tech3 & HRC teams indicates that Cal is exceeding expectation (lets shelf the idea that Marq is construed a freak. I personally don’t rate Pedro ‘comparatively’ and I’m more inclined to say it’s an ‘apples to apples’ comparative of rookie vs veteran. I would argue Pedro’s record has led most to believe he is better than he really is, remembering his entire stint spent at HRC, a 1st tier--in a parity challenged series…but lets not get off on a tangent).
Rebuttal: The entire point here is based on the ‘assumption’ that Dovi would be beating Cal in the first two rounds. I think it would be a fairly acceptable assumption based on the last few races of last year, where Cal finished the season with a string of DNFs. But in the interest of presenting a few facts, here is one, he did have a podium near the end of the season. If we are going to make assumptions, then its equally valid and fair to make the assumption that perhaps the taste of podium clicked something inside Cal. Perhaps Cal has turned the corner and realized crashing is exceedingly detrimental to his points classification, where over the off-season just maybe he vowed this would be Big Change #1. What about the assumption of who might be faster this season between Cal & Dovi? Without the time consuming exercise of going back and checking, I’ll assume here that Cal was much closer to the front of the pack during this pre-season testing than he was last year’s pre-season, backed up by the fact he topped the charts at some point. It was rather sensational news when Cal topped the test charts (as it was when Rossi ‘was back’ on top).
Rebuttal: I have no rebuttal. Pedro should be replaced immediately and without further delay. Other than Rossi at Ducati, no other manufacture has been so fixated and absolute in their unconditional willingness to create a prototype machine around its rider. In addition, UNLIKE Rossi at Ducati, HRC actually possessed the overwhelming means, technical juggernaut, and colossal influence and lobbying more akin to duress on the sport to execute their ambitions! This point cannot be overstated; it even surpasses the desperate attempt by Ducati to catapult Rossi, where within two years they did the “unthinkable” and attempted to build a ‘twin-spar’ DucatiGP. Even with the aid of the league to tweak the testing rules, tires (allegedly), machine weight rules, and whatever we were not privy behind the scenes, it still required a spectacular bailout back to a top tier machine resulting in a 1:4 chance at contention for VR--the GP rider (as has been calculated). Pedro has had no such hiccup, and has been on top tier package uninterrupted his entire GP career. How this did not produce at very least one solitary Big Boy title is shocking if you consider the overwhelming and exclusive odds in his favor; and quite the puig-elephant in the room when we consider his MotoGP career thus far. When the spectators and league are ready to crucify Ben Spies for one underperforming year after a googol of misfortune (pronounced “Google”--BJC, who declared Ben’s injuries and mechanicals as mere excuses), then I’d say Pedro has had 6x the opportunities and then some. Many of Pedro’s injuries have come by way of self-inflicted crashes or devious “hurry-ups” by Alberto Puig, who again just this last race at COTA purposefully fed Pedro a bogus lap count pit-board. This, reminiscent of the bogus pit-board which was spectacularly followed by a crash and a broken wing ending his title challenge (where was it, Germany I think). So I stand by my point, I think if HRC wanted to replace Pedro with Cal or any other top rider, then I’d applaud the move. God knows they wouldn’t shatter into tiny ....-bits, and even if they did break a few bones, at very least Cal has proven he could buck up for the occasion, as he did in his home GP.
Good night Y’all. :....:
3495621366946723
I'd just like to remind you that you described the diatribe you've now rebutted—which, by the way, I couldn't be arsed to read because it's far, far too long—as "brief." How can I be expected to read every novel from each drug- and booze-fueled personality of yours?
3495551366936131
You cnts make me laugh so hard sometimes. Sitting in the recliner cracking up, the neighbours think (know) I'm .........
3495811366971327
except for the eggheads that sounds way awesome.
if #27 ever does return for a wildcard i'll invite myself to hang out at your place first
3495831366972658
i'll be sure to do nothing dodgy near a cop
we can drink until we get la trancazo pigmeo motero out of you.
can't fight the urge to establish AmA territory
3495631366948360
I am with Jumkie on the Pedro should be replaced.
100% and without delay. Repsol has their Spaniard who can challenge for a championship and win it.
Since 2006 Pedro has been a bridesmaid, a comedy sidekick, you notice how in the batman series Robin never breaks out on his own?
Pedro had his batman first with Nicky, then with Casey and now Marquez will relegate him back to bridesmaid. His time as a No:1 riding was a ratings disaster, he never got to the number 1 spot.
He costs too much and has despite his ability to only communicate like beaker from the muppets far too much sway in the politics, through his manager Albert the Pig. He has failed in his mission from day one and has never succeeded, he has sat on the best bike (arguably) in motogp for too long and failed failed failed.
When marquez kicks his arse this year it will be his 9th successive year of "nearly".
The team should have been Stoner and Marquez with Pedro on a supported satellite ride.
I would really settle for Cal and Marquez (because I like Cal, and I'm scared that in his eyes I can see he will make a coat from my skin if I didn't).
.... Pedro.