2025 Silly Season

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I'm hoping for the yellow Yamaha blocks as a throwback to King Kenny, but I suspect we'll get the white and red blocks. But maybe I will be wrong.

Honda I heard a rumor they are doing the Doohan era Repsol livery. I wouldn't mind seeing the Rothman's style "RACING" livery to avoid the obvious cigarette inferences. I guess Gresini will probably run some sort of tribute to Fausto's younger racing days as the only other notable livery they ever had was the San Carlo Honda livery. Ducati I'm thinking a throwback to the 1978 Mike Hailwood Ducati livery. Their only other livery anyone remembers are either the Marlboro logos or the Marlboro barcodes, and neither would fly now.
Good call on the Ducati livery. They could also do a version of FILA Ducati, but that was a WSBK livery, so not really appropriate.

Yamaha did do the yellow speed blocks for Crutchlow once, so they might bring it back.

I didn’t think of the independent teams yet, but a given that LCR(The Castrol side), Gresini and VR46 will sport some form of their founders’ historic liveries.

No idea what KTM will do as their current livery is not that different from their first one. Or maybe they can revert to the Blue and Silver Tech3 KTM one, which was smashing.

I wouldn’t mind if Trackhouse did a Hayden tribute Stars and Stripes as they did in the pre season unveiling.
 
Good call on the Ducati livery. They could also do a version of FILA Ducati, but that was a WSBK livery, so not really appropriate.

Yamaha did do the yellow speed blocks for Crutchlow once, so they might bring it back.

I didn’t think of the independent teams yet, but a given that LCR(The Castrol side), Gresini and VR46 will sport some form of their founders’ historic liveries.

No idea what KTM will do as their current livery is not that different from their first one. Or maybe they can revert to the Blue and Silver Tech3 KTM one, which was smashing.

I wouldn’t mind if Trackhouse did a Hayden tribute Stars and Stripes as they did in the pre season unveiling.

I can't think of anything else that would make sense for Ducati for a historical perspective if you can't use the most well known of all their liveries.

KTM could swap out the heads of the Bulls with pictures of Christian Horner and Helmut Marko butting heads.

I was thinking maybe they can do this yearly at Silverstone or something. But the thing that would be cool too with the liveries is if on the windscreens, they put the rider's name of whom that livery was attached to as it was. So if Honda did a Rothman's livery, just put "Eddie" on the sides of the windscreen or if doing a YZR500 livery, "Wayne". It'd be a nice nod to everyone who came before.
 
I was also thinking too, I saw another video just now where it looks like there actually was no contact between Marc and Bulega. Looks like Bulega panicked when he saw MM up the inside and just grabbed too much brake. This is turning into the JFK assassination plot. No one has clean footage. It's just blurry ... smartphone footage which I didn't think was possible in 2024.

That being said, Ducati probably loves this. More free PR. No one has ever cared about this race in any year till this year because of MM simply lining up. Once again he has people talking (whether it's for the right or wrong reasons is obviously up for discussion) about Ducati. They got more PR out of this year's race than they've ever gotten with all previous years combined now.

All of this technology and we’re no closer to the truth. We just have 1000% more Zapruder films.
 
Well Senna used to stuff it up the inside or place the car where you needed to make a decision as to whether or not you wanted to crash. Then there was the whole spec Mercedes race at the newly opened Nurburgring GP circuit in 1984 when no one told him it was just an exhibition and he was racing balls to the wall just to win...which he did.

This is the very reason Senna is not on my list of racing greats, although I respect him for his focus and driving ability.

Even I, a latter day MM fan would consider him taking his crew to the ranch excessive but while MM is very definitely as ruthlessly competitive a rider as there has ever been he doesn’t actually exceed Rossi in this regard imo, and the adage in Rossi’s glory years even from compatriots was that he was your friend until you started beating him.

Doohan has been mentioned, and I would be interested to know if he meets Bern’s standards, as I am sure more than one of the great American 500 GP riders would, I was and am a huge fan, actually posted on the old Crash forum as Doohanfan, and esteem him above Rossi or MM even though both eventually surpassed him. Perhaps my glasses are rose coloured, but while he was fairly close to being the ultimate competitor I didn’t see him as racing unfairly other than perhaps being unfairly better in his prime or in a fashion dangerous to his rivals other than to their prospects of victory. In one of his most dominant title years I do remember him crashing out of a race, perhaps at PI, when 10 seconds or further in the lead still pushing for more.

I remain interested to see some definitive footage on the Bulega incident.

Doohan definitely is on my list of racing greats, though I like his attitude earlier in his GP career rather than the later part.

To clarify, he was more honest about not winning at Hockenheim in 1991. There he said he got tired as a reason for not winning. Later in his career his excuse for not winning was usually because of tires or some other reason not involving him simply being slower than the winning rider.

Marc wanted it more. End of story.

Sure sure, the tired old "wanting it more" excuse that justifies everything in war and racing.

I believe the distinction is that racing is ritualized war, not literal war.

The fact that Marquez seems to consider racing literal war (based on a number of well known incidents) places him in a category by himself, which I don't consider worthy of admiration.
 
Sure sure, the tired old "wanting it more" excuse that justifies everything in war and racing.

I believe the distinction is that racing is ritualized war, not literal war.

The fact that Marquez seems to consider racing literal war (based on a number of well known incidents) places him in a category by himself, which I don't consider worthy of admiration.

Sure, yet we have to read you stating he makes .... moves and is a .... based on some pretty average video footage that doesn't show any clear contact.
It appears actually raced for position in a race.
If they don't want racing then don't put highly competetive racers on the track and call it a race.
 
Sure, yet we have to read you stating he makes .... moves and is a .... based on some pretty average video footage that doesn't show any clear contact.
It appears actually raced for position in a race.
If they don't want racing then don't put highly competetive racers on the track and call it a race.

If it was only one or more debatable incidents with average footage…..

There are quite a few incidents with undebatable footage.
 
This is the very reason Senna is not on my list of racing greats, although I respect him for his focus and driving ability.



Doohan definitely is on my list of racing greats, though I like his attitude earlier in his GP career rather than the later part.

To clarify, he was more honest about not winning at Hockenheim in 1991. There he said he got tired as a reason for not winning. Later in his career his excuse for not winning was usually because of tires or some other reason not involving him simply being slower than the winning rider.
Sure, early on he asked Eddie Lawson for help and advice on how to ride a Honda 500 GP bike iirc, and his ascendancy was after Steady Eddy and Erv Kanemoto at least partially tamed the thing.

Rose coloured glasses perhaps as I said, as well as limited coverage back then in Australia, but I don’t recall him making many excuses over his run of 5 titles, or having much need to do so other than the year Max Biaggi ran him reasonably close, but he had a ready made excuse viz the condition of the leg he nearly lost, an excuse he didn’t really use, again iirc.

I gather after corrective surgery post career he walks reasonably well now, and is involved in selling private jets, which his fame and connections from his residence in Monaco during his career would probably help.
 
If it was only one or more debatable incidents with average footage…..

There are quite a few incidents with undebatable footage.

Show me the champions who have got to that level without racing incidents.
Perhaps we can then discuss unicorns and goblins or some other non-existent lifeform.
I see a racer who races hard to win, yes has made mistakes but doesn't go out and deliberately run into riders.
I have not seen anyone able to slide and save the front of a motorcycle like him however even if it is largely engineered away now
 
This is the very reason Senna is not on my list of racing greats, although I respect him for his focus and driving ability.

Sure sure, the tired old "wanting it more" excuse that justifies everything in war and racing.

I believe the distinction is that racing is ritualized war, not literal war.

The fact that Marquez seems to consider racing literal war (based on a number of well known incidents) places him in a category by himself, which I don't consider worthy of admiration.

Unfortunately Senna will always be on my list for better or worse. He was hardly the first to engage in dirty driving, he was only the one that was focused on by the media. I do recall most of his unsavory moves, while most people point to Suzuka 1990, I always pointed to Estoril 1980 when he put Alain Prost inches away from the pit wall at 190MPH. One of the most genuinely terrifying moments I've ever seen. But I think Michael Schumacher was far worse personally and made dangerous driving part of the sport. Max Verstappen was the final form. I've always made the argument the rise of dangerous driving in F1 had to do with the increase in safety. When the cars stopped being rolling petrol bombs, and chassis integrity became far greater, you saw more and more questionable moves on race day.

But my list will always be Jim Clark as number 1. Jimmy was sublime. Clean as a whistle as a driver, a true gentleman, and ungodly fast. Ironically, Senna worshipped Jim Clark.

I believe over the last 35-40 years grand prix motorcycle racing has slowly turned into literal war. It really in my opinion started once the Americans showed up in the 500cc world championship. Especially as it relates to Wayne and Kevin since it was pretty much a blood feud. I think though you could also point to the profile of GP racing rising. The more money that has come into the series, the stakes have become higher and higher. Guys only have months to make an impact on a team or face exile out of GP. When you are fighting just to survive you're going to do a lot of stuff you might not ordinarily do. Not justifying it by any means, but I think we have to look at what the series turned into, and why we see what we see now. MM has raced extremely clean this year though. Even someone like MM has something to prove regardless of championship tally, but he did it about as cleanly as I have ever seen from him in spite of a factory seat being on the line. He has to be respected for that if nothing else. Racing is brutal business. So is the business on the track now. When MM is gone from racing, we'll see someone else take up the mantle eventually for better or worse. Also it needs to be acknowledged MM does not complain about others racing him hard. He gives as good as he receives which is more than I could say for a lot of riders.
 
Sure, yet we have to read you stating he makes .... moves and is a .... based on some pretty average video footage that doesn't show any clear contact.
It appears actually raced for position in a race.
If they don't want racing then don't put highly competetive racers on the track and call it a race.
A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion promises not to, pointing out that it would drown if it killed the frog in the middle of the river. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I am sorry, but I couldn't resist the urge. It's my character."
Nice to know I'm not the only one!
People admiring the fact that he drove like a .... doesn't really make sense to me. But anyway, opinions are just that....
Senna has been elevated to mythical status because of of his death and the circumstances surrounding it. He is a martyr, and as a result is seen as one.

Senna's 2 main issues in my opinion was his naivety, he couldn't understand and play the politics of the sport the way those such as Prost did. He was also victim of his latin temperament at times. No one can doubt his raw speed though, in the same vein as Stoner.

He was completed screwed out of at least 1 world title because of Balestre though. I don't blame him for being utterly pissed at the extreme treatment he got in 1989.
Unfortunately Senna will always be on my list for better or worse. He was hardly the first to engage in dirty driving, he was only the one that was focused on by the media. I do recall most of his unsavory moves, while most people point to Suzuka 1990, I always pointed to Estoril 1980 when he put Alain Prost inches away from the pit wall at 190MPH. One of the most genuinely terrifying moments I've ever seen. But I think Michael Schumacher was far worse personally and made dangerous driving part of the sport. Max Verstappen was the final form. I've always made the argument the rise of dangerous driving in F1 had to do with the increase in safety. When the cars stopped being rolling petrol bombs, and chassis integrity became far greater, you saw more and more questionable moves on race day.
1988 for anyone who doesn't know, but I know that was a typo JPS.

Senna has to be on the list, for raw talent alone. No one, to this day, has exhibited such a talent for driving in the wet. Like Martin Brundle said. "He had a god given talent for knowing where the grip was at a corner, before he got there." I have raced at Donington Park and for him to have pulled the move he did in the opening lap of the 1993 race there still defies belief.
Senna was a hard racer, and pushed the limits like Marc does. But Schumcher was a plain old dirty cheater, pure and simple. Senna pushed the limits (and sometimes may have arguably been on/over them by the standards of the day) but Schumacher blatantly crossed them, and often got away with it because of his or Ferrari's stature. Senna never once, parked his car on a circuit to stop a rival beating his lap.

I absolutely agree with you, 100%, about the decline in driving standards correlate with the increase in safety. It's one reason MotoGP riders mostly ride with respect for each other, because they know they can get injured whereas most formula car drivers these days feel invincible. Max Verstappen screwed up big time in Monaco 2015, and had a crash that 10 yrs before would have likely killed him. Then he had the audacity to say he had been brake tested. The problem is today, is they are all just immature kids masquerading as racing drivers.

But my list will always be Jim Clark as number 1. Jimmy was sublime. Clean as a whistle as a driver, a true gentleman, and ungodly fast. Ironically, Senna worshipped Jim Clark.
The irony is, like Stoner, he never understood why he was so fast.
I believe over the last 35-40 years grand prix motorcycle racing has slowly turned into literal war. It really in my opinion started once the Americans showed up in the 500cc world championship. Especially as it relates to Wayne and Kevin since it was pretty much a blood feud. I think though you could also point to the profile of GP racing rising. The more money that has come into the series, the stakes have become higher and higher. Guys only have months to make an impact on a team or face exile out of GP. When you are fighting just to survive you're going to do a lot of stuff you might not ordinarily do. Not justifying it by any means, but I think we have to look at what the series turned into, and why we see what we see now.
Money and politics do that.
MM has raced extremely clean this year though. Even someone like MM has something to prove regardless of championship tally, but he did it about as cleanly as I have ever seen from him in spite of a factory seat being on the line. He has to be respected for that if nothing else. Racing is brutal business. So is the business on the track now. When MM is gone from racing, we'll see someone else take up the mantle eventually for better or worse. Also it needs to be acknowledged MM does not complain about others racing him hard. He gives as good as he receives which is more than I could say for a lot of riders.
This is the thing for me. The greats never do. He never moaned when people used him for a tow, accepting it was part of the game. The very same people who called Iannone 'Smart, Cunning and more' for towing Marquez, are the very same people who now criticise Marquez for doing it. This is what I cannot stand. Argue your position, not the person. I am a Marc fan, but have criticised him AND OTHERS for not slowing under yellows for example. I try, always, to make my observation based on my position, and not if the athlete involved is one I like or not.
 
Show me the champions who have got to that level without racing incidents.
Perhaps we can then discuss unicorns and goblins or some other non-existent lifeform.
I see a racer who races hard to win, yes has made mistakes but doesn't go out and deliberately run into riders.
I have not seen anyone able to slide and save the front of a motorcycle like him however even if it is largely engineered away now
Racing incidents are one thing. Running people off the track is another, which he has done on multiple occasions.
Unfortunately Senna will always be on my list for better or worse. He was hardly the first to engage in dirty driving, he was only the one that was focused on by the media. I do recall most of his unsavory moves, while most people point to Suzuka 1990, I always pointed to Estoril 1980 when he put Alain Prost inches away from the pit wall at 190MPH. One of the most genuinely terrifying moments I've ever seen.
I think Senna was the first dirty driver who became very successful. He was aided in this by the relative safety of the new cars and the desperation at being paired with Prost, who did not veto his coming to the team. Without the other, either one of those guys would have run the championship tally up into the record books before Schumacher did.
But I think Michael Schumacher was far worse personally and made dangerous driving part of the sport. Max Verstappen was the final form. I've always made the argument the rise of dangerous driving in F1 had to do with the increase in safety. When the cars stopped being rolling petrol bombs, and chassis integrity became far greater, you saw more and more questionable moves on race day.
No doubt Schumacher was the worst. And yes the relative safety of the cars made the difference. I pretty much stopped watching when Schumacher arrived.
But my list will always be Jim Clark as number 1. Jimmy was sublime. Clean as a whistle as a driver, a true gentleman, and ungodly fast. Ironically, Senna worshipped Jim Clark.
No doubt, Clark was the best of his era. Perhaps my all time favorite driver.
I believe over the last 35-40 years grand prix motorcycle racing has slowly turned into literal war. It really in my opinion started once the Americans showed up in the 500cc world championship. Especially as it relates to Wayne and Kevin since it was pretty much a blood feud. I think though you could also point to the profile of GP racing rising. The more money that has come into the series, the stakes have become higher and higher. Guys only have months to make an impact on a team or face exile out of GP. When you are fighting just to survive you're going to do a lot of stuff you might not ordinarily do. Not justifying it by any means, but I think we have to look at what the series turned into, and why we see what we see now. MM has raced extremely clean this year though. Even someone like MM has something to prove regardless of championship tally, but he did it about as cleanly as I have ever seen from him in spite of a factory seat being on the line. He has to be respected for that if nothing else. Racing is brutal business. So is the business on the track now. When MM is gone from racing, we'll see someone else take up the mantle eventually for better or worse. Also it needs to be acknowledged MM does not complain about others racing him hard. He gives as good as he receives which is more than I could say for a lot of riders.

Good post. I agree with most of it. Though I don’t recall either Rainey or Schwanz running each other or anybody else off the track.
 
Senna has been elevated to mythical status because of of his death and the circumstances surrounding it. He is a martyr, and as a result is seen as one.

He famously stated that god was on his side.

Senna has to be on the list, for raw talent alone. No one, to this day, has exhibited such a talent for driving in the wet. Like Martin Brundle said. "He had a god given talent for knowing where the grip was at a corner, before he got there." I have raced at Donington Park and for him to have pulled the move he did in the opening lap of the 1993 race there still defies belief.
Senna was a hard racer, and pushed the limits like Marc does. But Schumcher was a plain old dirty cheater, pure and simple. Senna pushed the limits (and sometimes may have arguably been on/over them by the standards of the day) but Schumacher blatantly crossed them, and often got away with it because of his or Ferrari's stature. Senna never once, parked his car on a circuit to stop a rival beating his lap.
Senna can be at the top of the list with raw talent. As far as racing with others on the track, no.
I absolutely agree with you, 100%, about the decline in driving standards correlate with the increase in safety. It's one reason MotoGP riders mostly ride with respect for each other, because they know they can get injured whereas most formula car drivers these days feel invincible. Max Verstappen screwed up big time in Monaco 2015, and had a crash that 10 yrs before would have likely killed him. Then he had the audacity to say he had been brake tested. The problem is today, is they are all just immature kids masquerading as racing drivers.


The irony is, like Stoner, he never understood why he was so fast.

Money and politics do that.

This is the thing for me. The greats never do. He never moaned when people used him for a tow, accepting it was part of the game. The very same people who called Iannone 'Smart, Cunning and more' for towing Marquez, are the very same people who now criticise Marquez for doing it. This is what I cannot stand. Argue your position, not the person. I am a Marc fan, but have criticised him AND OTHERS for not slowing under yellows for example. I try, always, to make my observation based on my position, and not if the athlete involved is one I like or not.
Great post. True that MM never complains about anybody racing him hard, which is most definitely to his credit.
 
A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion promises not to, pointing out that it would drown if it killed the frog in the middle of the river. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I am sorry, but I couldn't resist the urge. It's my character."

🤣 I literally almost posted this…or at least made a reference to it…yesterday. Marc is the scorpion. He cannot help himself. Many greats are this way. They say Michael Jordan wanted to bury you no matter what. If you played checkers with him, he wanted to crush you. This is how the great ones are wired.
 
🤣 I literally almost posted this…or at least made a reference to it…yesterday. Marc is the scorpion. He cannot help himself. Many greats are this way. They say Michael Jordan wanted to bury you no matter what. If you played checkers with him, he wanted to crush you. This is how the great ones are wired.
Lex posted his own variation on this old proverb in his inimitable fashion.
 
Senna can be at the top of the list with raw talent. As far as racing with others on the track, no.

Great post. True that MM never complains about anybody racing him hard, which is most definitely to his credit.
Thank you. And to your credit, you can compliment aspects of Marquez, even though you aren't a fan. This is truly what I love about the posters here.
🤣 I literally almost posted this…or at least made a reference to it…yesterday. Marc is the scorpion. He cannot help himself. Many greats are this way. They say Michael Jordan wanted to bury you no matter what. If you played checkers with him, he wanted to crush you. This is how the great ones are wired.
It's true!
 
Senna's going for a gap that exists quote is from Suzuka 1990, iirc.
And yes, it's total ......... Prost raced him dirty the year before. Ayrton wasn't gonna be denied another championship but didn't wanna admit to wrecking him.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top