I don’t have a great problem with the rule particularly if he got quite a number of warnings and the system which apprises the riders of warnings is robust.I don’t disagree about his insight, it’s excellent and he was a top rider. His monotone voice puts me to sleep though.
I think at the end of the day they have to set a rule in black and white. Which they did, leave the track limits 3x = warning, 5x = long lap. Deciding whether or not a rider gained an advantage is too arbitrary to apply consistently and as RD have shown they’re not consistent when handing out penalties that are judgement calls.
I think this weekend Fabios behaviour after the demotion and complaining about the 1x Mir left the track etc has lost him some fans. Not that I’m judging him for it, I’ve done worse in when I’ve felt I’ve been wronged by sports officials. Mir on the other hand continues to gain more fans with his balls and/or precise overtaking.
Another point, after Fabio’s tear off ended Jacks race and Pecco believes he hit a tear off that caused him to crash, do tear offs now need to be replaced?
Come to think of it, I would be happy if they made the rule retrospective, extending back to the Laguna Seca 2007 race.