I've read you say this a couple of times Iampony, and I'm compelled as before to politely correct you. YOU cannot be obliged to get "sucked" (unwillingly) into a conversation that YOU yourself became part of by ENTERING into it willing in an attempt to 'mock a racial slur' (see your "Mexican Monkey Bread" post) then using the "logic" that such a ‘slur must not exist because “you live in California and have never heard of it!" And just like that, YOU have let Kesh off the hook for not only using a 'PRECISE' racial slur, relevant to ME (no,not a random racial slur, one specific to the guy he is flame waring with, increasingly getting aggravated with, and digging deeper for provocation) and backed it up with pictures of monkeys (plausible deniability). What an amazing coincidence!
Recap:
1. You were not “sucked into” it unwillingly, YOU entered it willfully, FACT. Nobody forced or had cited your name for reference in the discussion UNTIL YOU, based on your own admission ‘tried to insert levity toward a racial slur’.
2. You did so by mocking a ‘real racial slur’ used here by your buddy Kesh on this forum.
3. You rudely said you refused to read my polite explanation, doubling down on your conclusion that such a slur must not exist because of your all encompassing knowledge on the subject, and found there to be no reference of it in the archives of your memory. Perhaps your memory isn’t what it use to be, since you had also forgot you posted a picture of yourself at a race when you declared I had no idea how you looked, presumably to buttress your acumen on the subject of race.
You may continue to claim you don’t want to be “dragged into these conversations” though as a point of FACT you have ‘dragged yourself into these, and I fully expect you to react negatively to me pointing out this detail. You’ve made it clear that I am your enemy, though as before I challenge you to explain why, as I have had few interactions with you, and certainly not contentious. As I’ve said, if anything, I’ve been positively supportive of you since you made public your health challenges. Perhaps you confused me with someone else.
I will note, again you entered 'again' this conversation on your own in the now infamous thread that highlights Keshav’s peculiar lack of credibility; “Non-Trolling Pledge”, you willingly ‘again’ entered the conversation (nobody sucked you into it). Though your particular ‘grievance’ is fascinating, you propose Synn stop his profanity, because women on the forum will be repulsed by the word “kunt” (....) YET, based on your notion of civility, you haven’t given it a thought that in the pantheon of disgusting taunts, a racial slurs might be more egregious to women? You bypassed Kesh and Barry Machine’s lowest attempts to bait and provoke a response using distasteful racial goading, stepping right over that, and went straight to the word ‘....’ that is used rather benignly given the Britishism connotation of our membership. I don’t get it, maybe you and I have a different idea of what women might be more aggrieved about, but I’m going with: racial slur>kunt.