This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Your Choice Of A Nickname For Marc Marquez

Not sure on a nickname but the kid is a freak.


I don't care what country he comes from, he is bloody good to watch.


Perhaps Lorenzo could jump ship to Repsol Honda next year & give Marc a push?


It sure looks like Pedrosa is a broken man.
 
Jumkie
3612221379200282

Marc shattered the lap record.  Therefore he is innocent.   :)


 


My wordy lordy yes he is !!!! ........  not just innocent but the "almighty", "the second coming of Stoner" " the bees knees", the "ants Pants" ......,  I'd say.


 


 


Its a ....... race track you gumby!!!! .... happens when you leave the safety of the pits.!! Especially on blind uphill turns.
 
Jumkie
3612191379199938

 

Its a great accomplishment, no doubt.  A bit of perspective though if I may (I know, the deal et al will read the following as 'hating, its fixed, spain'), don't know what you will think. Perspective, a higher order form of thought.  Stoner's lap record was done on the 800, we are talking 2 years ago (not one as you say above), and remember we are now on 1000s.  I'm laughing because the clowns (elite, deal, pov) have been tickling their few brain cells about extra ccs, where as here, it actually is a fact, he did it with more ccs.  Not only that, but the tire development has advanced for 2 years as well.  Most sane and informed observers of the series accept that the works HRC has become the dominant kit, and is much improved even from just a year ago.  Now lets look at the other side of this coin, Marc is a rookie, so his pole lap is amazing given this fact. (Btw, I don't take too much stock in him beating Pedro, as I think he is overrated. Beating him on the same kit simply reenforces my belief he isn't as good as most think). Lorenzo, who had trouble with the new gearbox it appears, was 3 tenth off  from Stoner's lap of 2 years ago, so not bad right.  But consider this, Lorenzo was not even able to better his lap time of 2 years ago, so make of it what you will. So all things considered, its amazing pole lap.  But its not like he did it on a vespa.  Either way, that's the perspective of it.  For me, the take away is that he is beating veterans, regardless.  And his willingness to let the bike move under him is spectacular.  

 

Haha, I'm reminded of that Far Side cartoon, where the guy is explaining something to his dog, and the dog hears, "bark bark bark".  Reminds me of some of the members here.  


The new bikes have slower corner speed , and are much heavier, and a rookie is the only one to go under Casey's record, and then Jumkie calls us brain dead, if you don't get it ill bully you into it and if that don't work ill try and hound you off, Jum you are a complete ...., lil red, im loosing respect? why cos im fed up with every thread being turned into an attack on the sport we all love by Jum, if im going to get .... for speaking out so be it, you cant talk about racing any more without the conspiracy queen jumping on you, any one with a brain can see what is going on here. And talking of clowns Jum, your sock puppets you use to try and reinforce your views are the saddest part of the whole saga,
 
jum jum jum (the far side)


Let me get this straight, u were happy to agree with me when ur boy Crutchlow was calling out the Spanish-centric favoritism, but im the .... because I point out the same .... for Marc? Have u tweeted Cal letting him know what a .... u think he is Mr. Double Standard Jr.? So far ur stellar rebuttal has been, but Marc is fast, so there.

The game is very simple. I 'had' no beef with u personally....until u decided to go personal, now im ur huckleberry. I even put a disclaimer on my last rant regarding Marc. U have a few choices on this vertual thing called a forum. U can chose to read ...then ignore, U can chose to skip over my posts entirely (I honestly dont mind), U can challenge urself by putting ur wits on the line and debate me (agree/disagree/constructive informed dialog/concede/deflect/change subject/use fallacy or whatever). U probably have gathered, I love debate. You have hardly debated me, all u have done recently is throw indirect (and now direct) quips. Thats not debate. Challenge the facts I present and the logic of my extrapolations. Otherwise butt out and pay no mind to my views rants venting posts.

Getting flustered because u dislike my takes and throwing quips (as u have) 'then' crying foul when I throw them back is chickenshit man. Bully? Dude, this is a forum, anything typed here is of no real consequence! YOU have all the power in this relationship because you have total control of your screen. Stop whining about what u read if all youre going to do is whine about what u read.

About sock puppets. How much u willing to man up? Put ur money where ur mouth is, Im ready to put up $1K. How about you? Are u gonna man up or like J4n0 coward out?

Now...can we go forward amicably?
 
Jumkie
3612521379233251

Let me get this straight, u were happy to agree with me when ur boy Crutchlow was calling out the Spanish-centric favoritism, but im the .... because I point out the same .... for Marc? Have u tweeted Cal letting him know what a .... u think he is Mr. Double Standard Jr.? So far ur stellar rebuttal has been, but Marc is fast, so there. The game is very simple. I 'had' no beef with u personally....until u decided to go personal, now im ur huckleberry. I even put a disclaimer on my last rant regarding Marc. U have a few choices on this vertual thing called a forum. U can chose to read ...then ignore, U can chose to skip over my posts entirely (I honestly dont mind), U can challenge urself by putting ur wits on the line and debate me (agree/disagree/constructive informed dialog/concede/deflect/change subject/use fallacy or whatever). U probably have gathered, I love debate. You have hardly debated me, all u have done recently is throw indirect (and now direct) quips. Thats not debate. Challenge the facts I present and the logic of my extrapolations. Otherwise butt out and pay no mind to my views rants venting posts. Getting flustered because u dislike my takes and throwing quips (as u have) 'then' crying foul when I throw them back is chickenshit man. Bully? Dude, this is a forum, anything typed here is of no real consequence! YOU have all the power in this relationship because you have total control of your screen. Stop whining about what u read if all youre going to do is whine about what u read. About sock puppets. How much u willing to man up? Put ur money where ur mouth is, Im ready to put up $1K. How about you? Are u gonna man up or like J4n0 coward out? Now...can we go forward amicably?


You got personal first, fact. there is no debate, you just try and brow beat us with pages of your views, and now you want to be the big man and put money up to see who is who on this virtual and no consequence  forum? funny as, I don't disagree with you that there is a lot wrong with moto gp but I will ask again, if its all so .... why do you bother to watch? or do you just enjoy telling us we are all dumb for not seeing it your way?
 
BarryMachine
3612411379218169

My wordy lordy yes he is !!!! ........  not just innocent but the "almighty", "the second coming of Stoner" " the bees knees", the "ants Pants" ......,  I'd say.


 


 


Its a ....... race track you gumby!!!! .... happens when you leave the safety of the pits.!! Especially on blind uphill turns.


As I recall, the aforementioned Stoner thought the Willairot incident to be fairly illustrative of the point he had been pilloried for making. Are they both in the right?


 


MM probably deservedly was cut some slack at the time because he was 18 and because his crew, supposedly composed of adults, sent him out knowing there was no time to get a lap in; I repeat he hit Willairot after receiving the chequered flag, uphill blind corner or whatever.


 


I have more trouble with him justifying it now, 2 years later with a moto 2 championship in hand and a premier class championship (which will no doubt be an astonishing achievement) very likely to follow. Being a fabulously fast rider doesn't make him a perfect human being, no more than it made Rossi, Stoner or Jorge perfect, although admittedly I find little for which to criticise Jorge these days.
 
You got personal first, fact. there is no debate, you just try and brow beat us with pages of your views, and now you want to be the big man and put money up to see who is who on this virtual and no consequenceforum? funny as, I don't disagree with you that there is a lot wrong with moto gp but I will ask again, if its all so .... why do you bother to watch? or do you just enjoy telling us we are all dumb for not seeing it your way?

Ah, I see I have offended u. Shall we examine the reason? (Honestly this is too bad, I generally prefer peace). I vent here on PS because of my peculiar personal perspective, and because I compulsively repeat it, I accept its a character flaw (in my defense i do attempt to argue the point). However if u think about it, none of it is of any real consequence. But this has now upset u enuf to respond, first indirect quips, but now leading to this. Should I apologize? Look, I generally try to keep track, but if I did go personal first, then my bad.

U questioninng my affection for the sport is simply that, ur trying to make a statement, not actually an inquiry. It is disingenuous rhetoric, the inquiry is not sincere because its not really even a question. Anyway, the answer is obvious and u already know it (or should know it). You ask simply because u disagree with my takes (well at least the ones u dont like).

About sock puppets. You are being serious, so im calling u to man up (u see, thats the other side of the coin when u make an accusation). Shut up or put up. $1,000.00 donated to Kropos site. Prove it, i'll cut the check. But if i manage to prove otherwise, u cut tge check. Thats 'the Deal'. U can chose to continue claiming I have aliases, but we both will know its cowardly.

Now, can we proceed amicably?
 
jum, your posts have become a cliché. and you are very mean from time to time :(


 


deal, you're a .... for not meeting up in donny.


 


 


 


i seriously hope that no one on here that stated that this is not 100% marquez fault ever visits a track as an active participant. at least let me know so that i can stay away from you sick ......


riders use their "inlap"or whatever we wanna call it after the session to even  practice standing starts and what not.


 


to compare this to what casey was complaining about , riders riding  at 100kph looking for a tow and blocking the track in a dangerous way, is just plain stupid.
 
cliché guevara
3612651379240262

jum, your posts have become a cliché. and you are very mean from time to time :(


 


deal, you're a .... for not meeting up in donny.


 


 


 


i seriously hope that no one on here that stated that this is not 100% marquez fault ever visits a track as an active participant. at least let me know so that i can stay away from you sick ......


riders use their "inlap"or whatever we wanna call it after the session to even  practice standing starts and what not.


 


to compare this to what casey was complaining about , riders riding  at 100kph looking for a tow and blocking the track in a dangerous way, is just plain stupid.


You know full well I did not go to Donny as I had to work and even took my son with me. so I don't see where this is coming from.
 
cliché guevara
3612651379240262

jum, your posts have become a cliché. and you are very mean from time to time :(


 


deal, you're a .... for not meeting up in donny.


 


 


 


i seriously hope that no one on here that stated that this is not 100% marquez fault ever visits a track as an active participant. at least let me know so that i can stay away from you sick ......


riders use their "inlap"or whatever we wanna call it after the session to even  practice standing starts and what not.


 


to compare this to what casey was complaining about , riders riding  at 100kph looking for a tow and blocking the track in a dangerous way, is just plain stupid.


I was referring to the De Puniet incident, which was the Willairot incident in reverse, ie Stoner was entitled to be on a fast lap and De Puniet and his cohort were not entitled to be dawdling on the racing line, looking to do practice starts or whatever on a blind corner with practice still live/no chequered flag, and raised it partly due to inherent fanboyism and partly to see if BM could reconcile both Stoner and MM being able to do no wrong (in his view).


 


Stoner was a "being a ...." about the issue overall as David Emmett put it at the time, shouldn't have punched De Puniet etc etc, but did have a point and was good enough to avoid both a Willairot incident and a closely adjacent wall.
 
thedeal
3612771379244510

You know full well I did not go to Donny as I had to work and even took my son with me. so I don't see where this is coming from.


Humour fail.
 
thedeal
3612771379244510

You know full well I did not go to Donny as I had to work and even took my son with me. so I don't see where this is coming from.


don't be so sensitive,jesus!


lighten up


 


 


@michaelm, we're on exactly the same page here. i was trying to argue exactly your point.
 
I don't remember it being after Marquez took the checkered, I thought he made it before the checkered and was on his last fast lap.... Guess I'll have to find the video.
 
Jumkie
3612601379236833

Ah, I see I have offended u. Shall we examine the reason? (Honestly this is too bad, I generally prefer peace). I vent here on PS because of my peculiar personal perspective, and because I compulsively repeat it, I accept its a character flaw (in my defense i do attempt to argue the point). However if u think about it, none of it is of any real consequence. But this has now upset u enuf to respond, first indirect quips, but now leading to this. Should I apologize? Look, I generally try to keep track, but if I did go personal first, then my bad. U questioninng my affection for the sport is simply that, ur trying to make a statement, not actually an inquiry. It is disingenuous rhetoric, the inquiry is not sincere because its not really even a question. Anyway, the answer is obvious and u already know it (or should know it). You ask simply because u disagree with my takes (well at least the ones u dont like). About sock puppets. You are being serious, so im calling u to man up (u see, thats the other side of the coin when u make an accusation). Shut up or put up. $1,000.00 donated to Kropos site. Prove it, i'll cut the check. But if i manage to prove otherwise, u cut tge check. Thats 'the Deal'. U can chose to continue claiming I have aliases, but we both will know its cowardly. Now, can we proceed amicably?


Firstly you have not offended me, and as for the bet, I own three forums and I am very computer/internet aware, I have a very powerful IP tracker and this can not tell you who is who if the IP addresses are manipulated, if I turn off my router for just a few minutes I will get a new IP, if I use a few devices at the same time I will be using three different IPs, if I use proxy servers I can have as many IPs as I like and all will be completely impossible to track,and as I don't have access to the Admin panel of this forum proving who is who is impossible as you well know, so trying to be the big man with the cash and making me look small for not excepting the bet is ridiculass. 
 
The bet's not redick as we all know MC is JKD! If u wanna go all IP tracker that's kewl though.
 
elitemafia
3612861379245412

I don't remember it being after Marquez took the checkered, I thought he made it before the checkered and was on his last fast lap.... Guess I'll have to find the video.


If ya don't ....... remember then why the .... did you go Rambo on TWO threads? .....
 
elitemafia
3612861379245412

I don't remember it being after Marquez took the checkered, I thought he made it before the checkered and was on his last fast lap.... Guess I'll have to find the video.


My recollection is that they sent MM out before the flag but with no time to complete a lap, hence the onus being at least partly on his team/crew. Race direction did penalise him by the way, rather implying even they thought he was in the wrong, the argument is about the penalty.
 
You know full well I did not go to Donny as I had to work and even took my son with me. so I don't see where this is coming from.

:lol: dude. Are u sure you're a Brit?

1. British humor, where did u misplace it? totally missed the friendly humor in Clich駳 post (he was giving u a friendly shout-out, like hey man I really missed u, we could've had fun together. Him calling u a "...." is like a friend calling u a "....". It was meant as a term of endearment.

2. British skin, yours doesn't seem to be the standard thicknesses. Bro, ur getting all sensative and bothered by my takes because of my propensity to talk .... about specific aspects that u are "tired" of reading and in some cases disagree with,but it hasnt stopped u from taking indirect jabs, now u cite foul because I throw them back directly? Where is that legendary British skin buddy?

3. Ok, Clitoris pointed out I can be mean sometimes. He is right actually. So I promise I will work on it. I will now deploy all my phantom aliases to do my bidding.

4. Like Clitoris said, lighten up bro. 'U say potato I say potato, I say tomato u say tomato....lets call the whole thing off.' (Doest quite work typing this, but somen old timer will get the reference). :)
 

Recent Discussions