3612221379200282
Marc shattered the lap record. Therefore he is innocent.
3612191379199938
Its a great accomplishment, no doubt. A bit of perspective though if I may (I know, the deal et al will read the following as 'hating, its fixed, spain'), don't know what you will think. Perspective, a higher order form of thought. Stoner's lap record was done on the 800, we are talking 2 years ago (not one as you say above), and remember we are now on 1000s. I'm laughing because the clowns (elite, deal, pov) have been tickling their few brain cells about extra ccs, where as here, it actually is a fact, he did it with more ccs. Not only that, but the tire development has advanced for 2 years as well. Most sane and informed observers of the series accept that the works HRC has become the dominant kit, and is much improved even from just a year ago. Now lets look at the other side of this coin, Marc is a rookie, so his pole lap is amazing given this fact. (Btw, I don't take too much stock in him beating Pedro, as I think he is overrated. Beating him on the same kit simply reenforces my belief he isn't as good as most think). Lorenzo, who had trouble with the new gearbox it appears, was 3 tenth off from Stoner's lap of 2 years ago, so not bad right. But consider this, Lorenzo was not even able to better his lap time of 2 years ago, so make of it what you will. So all things considered, its amazing pole lap. But its not like he did it on a vespa. Either way, that's the perspective of it. For me, the take away is that he is beating veterans, regardless. And his willingness to let the bike move under him is spectacular.
Haha, I'm reminded of that Far Side cartoon, where the guy is explaining something to his dog, and the dog hears, "bark bark bark". Reminds me of some of the members here.
jum jum jum (the far side)
3612521379233251
Let me get this straight, u were happy to agree with me when ur boy Crutchlow was calling out the Spanish-centric favoritism, but im the .... because I point out the same .... for Marc? Have u tweeted Cal letting him know what a .... u think he is Mr. Double Standard Jr.? So far ur stellar rebuttal has been, but Marc is fast, so there. The game is very simple. I 'had' no beef with u personally....until u decided to go personal, now im ur huckleberry. I even put a disclaimer on my last rant regarding Marc. U have a few choices on this vertual thing called a forum. U can chose to read ...then ignore, U can chose to skip over my posts entirely (I honestly dont mind), U can challenge urself by putting ur wits on the line and debate me (agree/disagree/constructive informed dialog/concede/deflect/change subject/use fallacy or whatever). U probably have gathered, I love debate. You have hardly debated me, all u have done recently is throw indirect (and now direct) quips. Thats not debate. Challenge the facts I present and the logic of my extrapolations. Otherwise butt out and pay no mind to my views rants venting posts. Getting flustered because u dislike my takes and throwing quips (as u have) 'then' crying foul when I throw them back is chickenshit man. Bully? Dude, this is a forum, anything typed here is of no real consequence! YOU have all the power in this relationship because you have total control of your screen. Stop whining about what u read if all youre going to do is whine about what u read. About sock puppets. How much u willing to man up? Put ur money where ur mouth is, Im ready to put up $1K. How about you? Are u gonna man up or like J4n0 coward out? Now...can we go forward amicably?
3612411379218169
My wordy lordy yes he is !!!! ........ not just innocent but the "almighty", "the second coming of Stoner" " the bees knees", the "ants Pants" ......, I'd say.
Its a ....... race track you gumby!!!! .... happens when you leave the safety of the pits.!! Especially on blind uphill turns.
You got personal first, fact. there is no debate, you just try and brow beat us with pages of your views, and now you want to be the big man and put money up to see who is who on this virtual and no consequenceforum? funny as, I don't disagree with you that there is a lot wrong with moto gp but I will ask again, if its all so .... why do you bother to watch? or do you just enjoy telling us we are all dumb for not seeing it your way?
3612651379240262
jum, your posts have become a cliché. and you are very mean from time to time
deal, you're a .... for not meeting up in donny.
i seriously hope that no one on here that stated that this is not 100% marquez fault ever visits a track as an active participant. at least let me know so that i can stay away from you sick ......
riders use their "inlap"or whatever we wanna call it after the session to even practice standing starts and what not.
to compare this to what casey was complaining about , riders riding at 100kph looking for a tow and blocking the track in a dangerous way, is just plain stupid.
3612651379240262
jum, your posts have become a cliché. and you are very mean from time to time
deal, you're a .... for not meeting up in donny.
i seriously hope that no one on here that stated that this is not 100% marquez fault ever visits a track as an active participant. at least let me know so that i can stay away from you sick ......
riders use their "inlap"or whatever we wanna call it after the session to even practice standing starts and what not.
to compare this to what casey was complaining about , riders riding at 100kph looking for a tow and blocking the track in a dangerous way, is just plain stupid.
3612771379244510
You know full well I did not go to Donny as I had to work and even took my son with me. so I don't see where this is coming from.
3612771379244510
You know full well I did not go to Donny as I had to work and even took my son with me. so I don't see where this is coming from.
3612601379236833
Ah, I see I have offended u. Shall we examine the reason? (Honestly this is too bad, I generally prefer peace). I vent here on PS because of my peculiar personal perspective, and because I compulsively repeat it, I accept its a character flaw (in my defense i do attempt to argue the point). However if u think about it, none of it is of any real consequence. But this has now upset u enuf to respond, first indirect quips, but now leading to this. Should I apologize? Look, I generally try to keep track, but if I did go personal first, then my bad. U questioninng my affection for the sport is simply that, ur trying to make a statement, not actually an inquiry. It is disingenuous rhetoric, the inquiry is not sincere because its not really even a question. Anyway, the answer is obvious and u already know it (or should know it). You ask simply because u disagree with my takes (well at least the ones u dont like). About sock puppets. You are being serious, so im calling u to man up (u see, thats the other side of the coin when u make an accusation). Shut up or put up. $1,000.00 donated to Kropos site. Prove it, i'll cut the check. But if i manage to prove otherwise, u cut tge check. Thats 'the Deal'. U can chose to continue claiming I have aliases, but we both will know its cowardly. Now, can we proceed amicably?
3612861379245412
I don't remember it being after Marquez took the checkered, I thought he made it before the checkered and was on his last fast lap.... Guess I'll have to find the video.
3612861379245412
I don't remember it being after Marquez took the checkered, I thought he made it before the checkered and was on his last fast lap.... Guess I'll have to find the video.
You know full well I did not go to Donny as I had to work and even took my son with me. so I don't see where this is coming from.