Joined Apr 2008
7K Posts | 3K+
Out of Nowhere
But as Mr. Chekhov (Anton that is) said:
Personally, I've always preferred the observations of Kropotkin.
But as Mr. Chekhov (Anton that is) said:
I will and have read almost anything, including Dickens, and can read quite fast, but even so found 19th century Russian literature fairly heavy going, and I would have thought Cool Blue has a point, that there were rather more things causative of misery in 19th century Russia than banality, against which the eventual Russian Revolution was directed even though it was not eventually curative of such ills, and if those who were not peasants/serfs thought banality was the worst problem this may possibly be an indication of why there was a revolution, although those perpetrating the evils whom Chekov had more than adequate opportunity to observe may well have been banal as was famously noted in regard to the Nazis in the following century. Chekov et al seemed to find quite a lot which was tragic but not necessarily banal to describe in any case.
I will and have read almost anything, including Dickens, and can read quite fast, but even so found 19th century Russian literature fairly heavy going, and I would have thought Cool Blue has a point, that there were rather more things causative of misery in 19th century Russia than banality, against which the eventual Russian Revolution was directed even though it was not eventually curative of such ills, and if those who were not peasants/serfs thought banality was the worst problem this may possibly be an indication of why there was a revolution, although those perpetrating the evils whom Chekov had more than adequate opportunity to observe may well have been banal as was famously noted in regard to the Nazis in the following century. Chekov et al seemed to find quite a lot which was tragic but not necessarily banal to describe in any case.
Anality? Im not familar with that term. Is that the tuesday night theme at Club Shov?
Your purjorative analysis of intent and body language is the definition of subjectivity. Not sure how that helps your narrative. But it did make me larf!! The few times when I have had a boss would NOT reflect a 'superior' / 'subordinate' relationship, but I do realise many do.
Make no mistake Jarno, Carmelo was SUMMONED to Rossi's trailer, not invited. By the very definition above. The video clearly shows an agitated Rossi summoning Carmelo to his trailer, not inviting him in a way such as "Would you love to come to my trailer later?" His words were an order.
Do you have proof of this?
I am no bopper but would seriously like to see the evidence in b/w,
Uhm, what? Brother, proof in black and white? You'll never read a press release from western governments that we are involved in mid-east wars over oil buddy. But it's obvious enough why we are there. It's definitely not to "liberate" people. I doubt you'll ever read a press release from Rossi or Carmelo that they use their considerable influence and leverage to doctor the sport. MotoGP is a microcosm of power politics.
Bro, did you not watch the video including the accompanying subtitles? In the context that this exchange occurred right after the Valencia race where Rossi accused Marquez of cheating before and after the race, and clearly this was the underlying context of this specific exchange, in the mists of Rossi's repeated accusations ad nausea since.
The exchange, caught on video, was the subject of the sport media ( a VR friendly one no les) pointing it out as representative of borderline collusion, certainly a display of an inappropriate dynamic between the supposed impartiality the league is supposed to represent and one of its contestants.
Uhm, what? Brother, proof in black and white? You'll never read a press release from western governments that we are involved in mid-east wars over oil buddy. But it's obvious enough why we are there. It's definitely not to "liberate" people. I doubt you'll ever read a press release from Rossi or Carmelo that they use their considerable influence and leverage to doctor the sport. MotoGP is a microcosm of power politics.
Bro, did you not watch the video including the accompanying subtitles? In the context that this exchange occurred right after the Valencia race where Rossi accused Marquez of cheating before and after the race, and clearly this was the underlying context of this specific exchange, in the mists of Rossi's repeated accusations ad nausea since.
The exchange, caught on video, was the subject of the sport media ( a VR friendly one no les) pointing it out as representative of borderline collusion, certainly a display of an inappropriate dynamic between the supposed impartiality the league is supposed to represent and one of its contestants.
Ah, ok, but it was translated bro. Sure there could be some loss, I agree, though I'm not sure how much meaning is lost even if the words themselves can be replaced with synonyms. Maybe an Italian speaker can refute the subtitles in the video then. But the overall arch of this exchange seems rather clear.Yeah but what were they talking about?
It isn't actually said.
FFS man everyone can see conspiracies in anything,
Need better than that,
Banality? Im not familar with that term. Is that the tuesday night theme at Club Shov?
Do you have proof of this?
I am no bopper but would seriously like to see the evidence in b/w,
Nope you have it confused with Bananality which involves fruit platters
"Yes we have no bananas" related more to an early 20th century/Great Depression context but could perhaps be extended metaphorically to the plight of serfdom in late 19th century Russia.
I'll just assume you have read 19th century literature and your comments are a joke I'm not getting...
Holy ..... No wonder these guys get away with blatant rigging. I swear if we saw Rossi butt ....... Carmelo moaning in Italian on video, ya'll mothfloggers would be saying, well, we don't really know, I need to see a close up of the actual penistration. And...what are they moaning about, it's inconclusive conspiracy.Just saying ................ but I suggest that whilst the words were spoken, the body language is being interpreted somewhat differently and thus the conspiracy theory is created or supported (all depends on your view)
IMO only, but VR's body language does change markedly as does Ezzy's at points during the conversation.
No matter what though, unless there is later video of Ezzy entering the Rossi motorhome, it is much ado about nothing (even though the reports of the open door policy came from eslewhere).
I do not fully agree with conspiracy but I also have no doubt that VR has access to Ezpeleta that is not available to others, much as the valuable team member has access to management or benefits. What is said, discussed or implemented as a result is pure conjecture until it is released and confirmed by one involved
Holy ..... No wonder these guys get away with blatant rigging. I swear if we saw Rossi butt ....... Carmelo moaning in Italian on video, ya'll mothfloggers would be saying, well, we don't really know, I need to see a close up of the actual penistration. And...what are they moaning about, it's inconclusive conspiracy.
That video is as vague and ambiguous as Rossi's running of Marquez off the track at Sepang. Yeah yeah real debatable stuff......... Jums and you know it.
That video proves nothing ............ it does allude to or infer but it does not prove that there is a conspiracy or that Rossi is buttfucking Ezpeleta or even that Ezpeleta was conducive to being covered in chocolate and have team VR lick it from his body.
What the video does show is that one participant in the video is clearly pissed off and seemingly demanding that the second participant meet later to discuss the 'suspicions' of collusion.
It does not show that such a meeting took place, it does not show that such a meeting ever took place and it does not show where Rossi barebacked or rubbered up.
Yes there are media reports that Rossi has high levels of access to Ezpeleta, and these have no doubt been in place for years so why the furore now and not back in 2003, 2007, 2012 etc (the answer seemingly being that a video now proves it) ?
The suspicions have been around for a lot of years, and as the saying goes, where there is smoke there is fire and to me there is definitely fire but it is not the out of control bushfire that some seemingly want to believe (my opinion).
Ezzy is no fool, he knows that his golden goose must be kept happy to maintain the income stream of the sport over which Ezzy presides (I am not happy about it either), but the sheer facts are that Rossi and his persona bring in a large amount of income for Ezpeleta, DORNA and it could be argued, that some of this income is poured back to the sport by way of DORNA subsidies to teams
Dorna have allowed the monster to continue to grow ......... the monster is only doing what ALL people in his position may well do ............ scream, shout, throw toys from the pram, spit the dummy and try to get their way
That video is as vague and ambiguous as Rossi's running of Marquez off the track at Sepang. Yeah yeah real debatable stuff.
........ Jums and you know it .............. evidence takes a number of variations, the video only forms a part and is not conclusive
That video proves nothing ............ it does allude to or infer but it does not prove that there is a conspiracy or that Rossi is buttfucking Ezpeleta or even that Ezpeleta was conducive to being covered in chocolate and have team VR lick it from his body.
What the video does show is that one participant in the video is clearly pissed off and seemingly demanding that the second participant meet later to discuss the 'suspicions' of collusion.
It does not show that such a meeting took place, it does not show that such a meeting ever took place and it does not show where Rossi barebacked or rubbered up.
Yes there are media reports that Rossi has high levels of access to Ezpeleta, and these have no doubt been in place for years so why the furore now and not back in 2003, 2007, 2012 etc (the answer seemingly being that a video now proves it) ?
The suspicions have been around for a lot of years, and as the saying goes, where there is smoke there is fire and to me there is definitely fire but it is not the out of control bushfire that some seemingly want to believe (my opinion).
Ezzy is no fool, he knows that his golden goose must be kept happy to maintain the income stream of the sport over which Ezzy presides (I am not happy about it either), but the sheer facts are that Rossi and his persona bring in a large amount of income for Ezpeleta, DORNA and it could be argued, that some of this income is poured back to the sport by way of DORNA subsidies to teams
Dorna have allowed the monster to continue to grow ......... the monster is only doing what ALL people in his position may well do ............ scream, shout, throw toys from the pram, spit the dummy and try to get their way