<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(povol @ Jul 28 2007, 09:21 PM) [snapback]81947[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
They can complain about anything they like but when their ilk start calling for a spec tire,its hypoctitical at best.Its funny how the series didnt need fixing when he was dominatong on Michelins and Bridgestones was getting its head handed to them.This is all about the huge Rossi fan base looking for excuses as to why their god is failing them.He won titles with a superior tire,he can lose a couple to a superior tire.
Jeezz, calm down, when bridgestone had their head (...?) handed to them no one, and I guss, including you, cared as there were no championship contenders running on those tires. "Everybody" were on michelins, so why would anyone complain. And indeed nobody did, even those that got free Bridgestones were happy. When there are real championship contenders on both tires, and one make a significant difference the discusssion is bound to come up.
To claim that it's only about Rossi now sounds a bit paranoid to me.
Go back a few postes and see where Biaggi agree with him. Hardly because of his love for Rossi?
And for the record, I'm a Rossi fan, but not a fan of single tire regulation.
I want the tire war to continue and to be a power to drive the development. But just as in all other motorsports, the goal is close racing. And that's not what we see now. That the two brands switch postitions is not what anyone really wants in the log run, especially when there are chmpionship contender on both sides, even if surpricingly many are so anti michelin, that they seem to prefer rules where the stones come out best and ".... michelin". Anyway, if there continue to be such huge differences from race to race, I think the rules need to be looked into. Not to create a new specific advantage to anyone, but so that both are able to deliver their best.