Joined Oct 2006
25K Posts | 4K+
Your Mom's House
baturro
Haha, great play on words amigo. It really does look so effortless when they are out there doesn't it? Did you see when Jlo hit the patch of water? The conditions were tricky were they not? So what is your technical objection to the statement? There was still patchy areas of rain. Thats what he was talking about. You've now turned his comments about the condition and its safety into a whine very similar to when Stoner would give his straight talk opinion. Its not your .... on the line, is it? Ironically, you got Sloth and Mr. Squiz (who I thought had slit his wrists) to like your comment, yet I'm almost certain Stoner would have had the same take. In an instant .... can happen, just look at Bradl now. A rather unassuming crash and his foot gets jammed up. Which btw, I wonder if RD will issue a penalty point to the circuit (oh I could hear Kropos/Noyes tweets now if the tarmac's edge had injured Marky). Again, while your .... is not on the line, sure you can talk tough about the relative safety of conditions. But these guys understand (at least most of them) a moment can turn into serious injury. No wonder he took a dig at Dorna for aquising to tv scheduling and their perception that the audience demand the riders perform on the knife's edge for the thrill. Its got to be raining oil from the sky for some people to understand that conditions can be treacherous. I remember sitting in Hurricane Ike at Indy thinking, holy ...., nobody gives a .... if these dudes die. And if your retort is, well nobody has a gun to their heads to ride, then you've really missed the point and the mindset of such competitors. Its better if they just shut up about ...., right Bat?
3631941381611021
http://motor.as.com/motor/2013/10/12/motociclismo/1381576824_454812.html
"We should avoid riding in these conditions"
Haha, great play on words amigo. It really does look so effortless when they are out there doesn't it? Did you see when Jlo hit the patch of water? The conditions were tricky were they not? So what is your technical objection to the statement? There was still patchy areas of rain. Thats what he was talking about. You've now turned his comments about the condition and its safety into a whine very similar to when Stoner would give his straight talk opinion. Its not your .... on the line, is it? Ironically, you got Sloth and Mr. Squiz (who I thought had slit his wrists) to like your comment, yet I'm almost certain Stoner would have had the same take. In an instant .... can happen, just look at Bradl now. A rather unassuming crash and his foot gets jammed up. Which btw, I wonder if RD will issue a penalty point to the circuit (oh I could hear Kropos/Noyes tweets now if the tarmac's edge had injured Marky). Again, while your .... is not on the line, sure you can talk tough about the relative safety of conditions. But these guys understand (at least most of them) a moment can turn into serious injury. No wonder he took a dig at Dorna for aquising to tv scheduling and their perception that the audience demand the riders perform on the knife's edge for the thrill. Its got to be raining oil from the sky for some people to understand that conditions can be treacherous. I remember sitting in Hurricane Ike at Indy thinking, holy ...., nobody gives a .... if these dudes die. And if your retort is, well nobody has a gun to their heads to ride, then you've really missed the point and the mindset of such competitors. Its better if they just shut up about ...., right Bat?