This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Pending Dorna Bailout (Rossi threatening not to race in Valencia)

What VR did to Lorenzo at Motegi 2010 with overtake maneuvers was in very close to what went on in Sepang before MM went down.

I've seen some elsewhere claim that this was acceptable because Lorenzo was so far ahead in the points lead, that what was the big deal. Make of that what you will.

I don't think it's same thing by miles, at Motegi Rossi didn't slow down on purpose and let any other rider's to go passed him and picked the fight up with Lorenzo. IMO vale was wrong but Lorenzo did had big points cushion though.
 
I don't think it's same thing by miles, at Motegi Rossi didn't slow down on purpose and let any other rider's to go passed him and picked the fight up with Lorenzo. IMO vale was wrong but Lorenzo did had big points cushion though.

MM ran wide. There's nothing that even supports your implied assertion that MM slowed intentionally to let Lorenzo by.

He has a whole history of running wide throughout the entire season.
 
Just curious: What penalty should Hanika have received...and what penalty should Spaan have received?
I don't know anything about those incidents. So can't offer a comment. But regarding Rossi, I have been clear. His actions merited an immediate black flag. A race ban. Then when he admitted his intention, a minimum of a year ban.
 
So you consider Mike Webb's statement ("“Despite what Marquez said we think he was deliberately trying to affect the pace of Valentino") as ........ as well? Or not relevant to forming a balanced opinion on this (ugly) episode? Not that balanced views are your forte, we kknow that. [emoji14]
Mike Webb: Despite what Marquez said we have relied on our powers of mind reading.

This episode ruined Mike Webb's credibility. You may use his opinion to support the 'fake evidence' against Marc. But there are others out there with equal or far more racing experience who called ........ on Race Direction.
 
Of course, and that is why Rossi has been punished. Marquez on the other hand was just "not punishable under the rules" but nobody in race direction believed he was just happily racing his own race.
The fact you believe Rossi was "punished" is laughable (at best). He was issued 3 penalty points! Only because he had 1 prior does he start at the back. 3 points would have seen no effect. This for a deliberate action to cause harm to another fellow participant, something so rarely seen and henious that in a normal world should have resulted in long term suspension, and criminal charges. He used his machine as a weapon to run another competitor off the racing surface. Everything you want to rationalize why he committed this crime is irrelevant!
 
Trying to affect the pace of another rider is not "racing for position". These are two diffferent things.
Offer proof for this assertion. You have none. Neither did Race Direction. Yet you base this as truth relying on Mike Webb's mind reading.
 
In YOUR opinion. That is not FACT. And again I iterate, show any of us on the FIM regulations what rule number Marquez broke.

By that argument, why did Lorenzo not get any sactions for Valencia 2013? There he was clearly trying to bunch the pack up by interferring with the two Repsol Honda's pace...and arguably most of the frontrunning field.

ETA: What about Laguna 2008. There are numerous sources that claim Rossi brake checked Stoner before he ran off. There has never been any proof surfaced to credit or discredit this claim. Rossi says he didn't, Stoner said he wasn't sure. So where is this different to the "Was Marquez going flat out or not" argument?
....... Ace!
 
There has been enough drama to catch CNN's attention.

MotoGP: Online petition fuels Valentino Rossi debate - CNN.com
Just when I thought this thing couldn't get any worse! Holy ..... CNN just gave a world wide platform to one absolutely insane bopper who organized a like minded mob, a very large mob. This report is overwhelmingly one sided. Religious Extremism at work here with the added benefit it's done in the age of social media where the 4th Estate is hungry for sensationalism and it's duty of examination of truth and decency is dead.

The winners: The Rossi Tyranny, The Cult of Rossi

The personal victims: Marquez and Lorenzo. Their real lives and careers have been ruined. Stoner was right in distancing himself from such a highjacked entity that is the state of GP.

The losers: honest and real MotoGP racing fans and those honest participants.

If anyone has ever looked upon dark episodes in history and wondered how the human specie got to that point, you are seeing a microcosm of how it happens in real time. The wolves are guarding the hen house.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

I call on all of us who agrees with my sentiments to contrast this petition. Sure we are in the minority, it's always been like that in history, but when the ashes have settled, your stand, as small as it may seem, will offer inspiration and hope to others. If at very least register your opinion contrary to this perversion of the sport here.
 
Maybe it is me, but I'd rather see guys in the title picture getting raced hard regardless of how it ..... up their title hopes.

There should be no freebie positions given just because a rider happens to be leading the points battle, or is in a fight with another championship contender.

When positions are freely given, it robs the fans as the position is no longer earned. I pay money to see the racers....race. Shocking idea isn't it?

This unwritten rule of not racing someone because they are trying to win a title is a ....... joke, and anyone who moves out of the way is engaging in what amounts to race fixing at the end of the day.

That it is not a written rule tells you why it's a crock of .....

Just like the idiotic notions that come out of MLB's "unwritten rules" such as a dramatic homerun bat flip being deemed as AWFUL because of a bunch of blowhards who still think it is 1890.
 
Now that Race Direction has openly said there's essentially nothing wrong a rider attempting to fix the outcome of a race, Pandora's box has been opened. I'd like to believe attempts to fix races were rare before Sepang, but now it's going to be a lot more common unless Dorna creates a new rule.
 
Either you guys are deaf or pretend to be. Your freedom of course, being deaf is not a crime. We all know MM's behavior was "guilty but not punishable" as Mike Webb put it, but the fact remains that it wasn't innocent behavior. Not by a mile. So you can't go on just answering "he didnt break any rules". We all know that. Thank you.
.

You don't KNOW anything. Its a modern day witch hunt! You have no evidence except your religious like faith in Rossi's accusations. Mike Webb possibly suffers from the same ailment with the added pressure that going against Dorna, even his own status, was on the balance. Such is the monster they created when they doctored the sport. This is absolute religious extremism. You have NO MORE knowledge nor evidence nor proof Marquez is a witch as did those accusers had that burned 19 girls in the Salem witch hunts. Produce something substantive, all you've offered so far is Mike Webb going on a hunch, his personal belief, that is his faith, that Marquez is lying.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You don't KNOW anything. Its a modern day witch hunt! You have no evidence except your religion like faith in Rossi's accusations. Mike Webb suffer from the same ailment with the added pressure that going against Dorna, even his own status, was on the balance. Such is the monster they created when they doctored the sport. This is absolute religious extremism. You have NO MORE knowledge nor evidence nor proof Marquez is a witch as did those accusers had that burned 19 girls in the Salem witch hunts. Produce something substantive, all you've offered so far is Mike Webb going on a hunch, his personal belief, that is his faith, that Marquez is lying.

How do you know the evidence that Marquez was ....... with Rossi is not in his telemetry data that Mike Webb would of had access to?
 
Really clutching at straws now. A really, really bada analogy!



If we are talking ethics, lets talk Jerez 05, Laguna 08, Motegi 10 not to mention times Rossi has personally ridiculed other riders (like Biaggi and the blow up doll incident) amongst others. Lets talk about Rossi personally attacking Marquez in the press conferences on Thursday. When Rossi races hard, he's epic and brings excitement to the sport. When Marquez came in, he was exciting and brought excitement to the sport, until it affected Valentino Rossi. Now he's being branded unethical by many people who support the one man who has arguably been the most unethical rider this millenium. No one but MM knows for sure what his race pace could have been, so to present his pace as fact is considerable speculation.

I personally am not 100% convinced by the Marquez sandbagging theory. The lap times Rossi and he were doing were consistent with riders battling as hard as they were. I'm not saying MM wasn't, but what I'm saying is I've satisfied myself with the evidence available and not the seed planted by Rossi.
Excellent.

While I am 100% convinced Marquez was not toying with Rossi. Marquez supposed guilt is SOLELY based on Rossi's ........ accusations!
 
This season we have seen Rossi bested in a few hard fought battles. With Ianonne. and with Pedrosa for example. He's given them thumbs up on the cool down lap and accolades post race. These guys know when something not kosher. imo there was zero doubt that rossi knew marc was not running a normal race in PI. he tried to defuse it by calling him out. It didn't work.

BTW how fast were they going when marc went down? anyone know?
Bro, Your assumption is that when Rossi gives the thumbs up its a cue that they were honest. When Rossi gives the thumbs down the rider should be crucified. Nothing to do with actual intentions ALL TO DO with Rossi's assessment. Marc's life and career has been ruined by Rossi. Its not the first life and career he has ruined either based on such cues.


Don't know how fast, but I do know it was fast 'enough ' to have caused serious bodily harm including death. If you don't believe that friend, the cemetery knows otherwise.
 
Basically Agostini says things that are very reasonable: Rossi lost his nerve and self-control, not only during the race but already at the Press Conference. He stresses that he should not have brought up the controversy on Thursday, before a crucial race. However he never says that Rossi was wrong in his allegations.

He never says Rossi's accusations were wrong. Hey J4rn0, you can add his non comments then to your house of cards against Marquez, certainly there is enough there, albeit nothing, to support Marquez' guilt.
 
The difference is that MM was also found guilty by Race Direction, albeit "not punishable under the rules". You like to gliss over that significant part of Race Direction's conclusions, but it's there. Until you acknowledge it, you are just playing deaf pretending it's only my opinion against yours, but it's not. :rolleyes:
Race Insurrection found Marquez guilty in the EXACT way the accused "witches" were found "guilty"...and murdered for it.

What you are saying is that those witches were justly accused and paid the resulting just penalty for their crime. Because, as you reason, they were accused by a entity with authority!

J4no, there is no way around it. You're wrong here.
 
Last edited:
How do you know the evidence that Marquez was ....... with Rossi is not in his telemetry data that Mike Webb would of had access to?

How would Mike Webb know?

People have claimed MM was going slower, but this is a guy who has had a lot of front tire issues this year. I've stated I think the RCV is better than was ever admitted to, just that MM couldn't adapt his riding style to the bike in the 1st half of the season.

Everything MM does is off of the front tire.

He rotates the rear of the bike based on how heavy he is braking the front...and we know that rotation is key to how he enters a corner as well as how much speed he carries through the corner. Track surface, temperature, tire compounds, and the synchronization of these things would explain a lot with the ebbs and flows of the entire season for MM. If it's not a perfect match, you have to try and change setup to make up for these things. It would also explain why he isn't always capable of sustaining pace for multiple laps...people seem to think whatever one sets time-wise in qualifying must be repeated, and should be repeated on every lap, or near every lap of the race.

As I've stated, the M1's improved this year as well, enough obviously to knock Honda on their ... for large chunks of the season. What MM now had to do was race harder than he had to (yes he always races hard but he hadn't been pushed into making the sort of mistakes he did this season) in the past, and those moments he had where he could back off the pace a little bit became more infrequent, so the front would be pushed harder than it had in the past...hence the seeming "inconsistency" with lap times that suddenly became a point of contention only after VR started flapping his lips. MM stated the front was overheating in Phillip Island...this is not a huge leap of faith given that he brakes harder than any rider on the grid.

Mike Webb is not privy to every issue that goes on with these machines, and why a rider might be backing off, or anything else that goes on. That's why they have the team of engineers that they do. It's too much for one person to process.
 
How do you know the evidence that Marquez was ....... with Rossi is not in his telemetry data that Mike Webb would of had access to?
Is there a sensor or parameter in the telemetry that reads the measure of intent? The notion that the telemetry can offer a smoking gun is laughable at best.
 

Recent Discussions