Joined Oct 2006
25K Posts | 4K+
Your Mom's House
Well I play lots of games around here. Most of the time actually, because as you pointed out on another thread, very little intelligent debate happens. But when I see it, I'll join in. Anyway...
Here is your exact quote:
Now you have two options, you can weasel your way out of it and start splitting hairs that you really meant something else, or you can stick to your apology above.
What did you mean here? Keep in mind, all I said above was that you thought Stoner's success was due to Ducati's TC (nothing more so don't go adding to it). Which is basically what you are saying above "Casey needs Ducatic TC..." This of course was based on very little evidence, kinda reminds me of Babel. But when Casey finally addressed it, he actually said the opposite, he said he used very little TC. Either way, I've never had a problem even if he did use the most, because TC is just another rider aid like wheele control, electronic suspension, etc. and if he was able to exploit it to its max potential, then good for him. But most people don't even understand what TC really is, most think its just some dial you turn up like the volume of a car radio, but its infinitely more complex. In fact, you can use all you want, but that may actually make you slower. Lots of peeps accused Stoner as if TC was some bad word and he had some unfair advantage. Esco, you mention in another thread along with Woody that you want intelligent debate, no more slagging right? Ok, I'm game. But when you get called on stuff, your reaction above is the one that's appropriate, and I hope I have the same wherewithal to do the same. But most of the time, what happens? I'll challenge or debunk somebody's dear held belief, and then they'll call me a hater. Just like you did. (Would you like me to give you the exact quote too?)
So then, you want intelligent debate? What would you like to talk about?
