<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Oct 6 2008, 10:11 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I don't dislike West. I was actually one of few that thought he had earned a look after his WSB performances. But I don't think he deserves to be in MotoGP any more. He did get beat at Hoppers GP by a fairly old wildcard rider named Hacking.
But I will agree with you that he is somewhat of a scapegoat. But as you sight Hoppers pay, seems rather irrelevant, lets not forget that those mere 4 points would have been a bit more if we factor in the DNFs and injuries Hopper has had, so its a bit unfair to look at just that.
I'm obviously a bit of a Hopper fan, so yup, the bias is forthcoming, this is one reason why I'm looking forward to next year to answer these questions about Hopper's talent. He will be teamed up with a guy we all "know" is a proven talent, so judging from their performances, I think it will shed some light on this year's results. I mean, imagine if they are always at the back, could you really say
riders suck or the machine sucks? Now if Hopper out performs Melandri, then I think we can fairly deduce he is better than we think, certainly better than his results would indicate. But we'll have to all wait and see.
Jumkie, you could probably well see me arguing a little here as whilst I totally agree that West is 'in over his head' and totally agree that he is the scapegoat I should remind that yes, he was beaten by Hacking at Laguna but West then beat Hopkins at Indy (amongst others).
Additionally as has been reported a few times, West has ridden much of this year with fractured vertebrae in his back which would have been causing him great discomfort and pain, so IMO he has actually performed admirably and at least equal of his more highly rated team-mate.
IMO, both are being shafted by Kawasaki who are producing a bike that cannot match the skills of either riders yet Kawasaki seem to be looking at blaming everyone but themselves. IMO, both Kawasaki and Suzuki need to have a good look at themselves to produce a package that is at least capable of being raced in this class and achieving decent results.
For me, West is not the problem at Kawasaki and whilst I at this stage think JHopkins to be massively over-hyped, he also is not the problem at Kawasaki but if results are poor next year Hopkins will go the way of West and IMO Melandri is not the answer either. It may be time to start by looking at whether Bartholmey is the right person and/or the R&D and/or going back to the drawing board
Garry