Or was it all a sham and a fraud?
Interesting post. Thanks for the insight.
For me the debate is not just about the disparity of the machine and teams. But rather the power politics which artificially enhances the disparity going in. Its like an added layer of disparity, in practical terms, like a performance enhancing drug to those teams. These power politics manifest themselves in different ways, for example with the tier system of tires under Michelin during the first years of the 2000s, or the influence to switch in 08, and drive the development for that tire which always seems to be done in mystery, etc. Which most journalists barely acknowledge at least certainly don't highlight the implications (while ad nausea argue the existence of a "kick" or not).
This article has an element of what I'm talking about. Some sit here and say oh this kid is strong enough to just let it roll off his shoulder, as if he is not some human being made of flesh and blood. I'm pretty sure nobody here on this forum can just let .... roll off their shoulders because to a man/women here I've seen people react to less ...., often going ballistic over words on a virtual space, you and I included. So I find it a bit unrealistic (at best) to say oh no worries Marc won't be affected by being the most hated rider in the paddock. And make no mistake, hated he is, he is the man responsible for cheating the most beloved rider of all time out of a rightful title, not just any title either, but the one that would be used to elevate him into mythical status.
Just today I listened to two guys in a podcast who for the most part spoke of the characters in racing (tangentially regarding Danny Eslick), where at one point one of the two said last year's Lorenzo title should have an * because Marquez robbed Rossi. These were people like you and i, people who spend most of their time thinking about this sport, who have been involved in some capacity. Seemingly as sane as you and i. This opinion is repeated among the paddock, former racers, principals, spectators, etc. In fact I'd say it's the predominant opinion. I can still hear Carmelo Ezpeleta say in that interview sitting at his desk 'it's obvious what happened, we all saw it, we know what happened', suggesting Marquez had screwed Rossi out of a title. Even Mr. Mike Webb who you endorse, supposedly did the right thing explicitly indicted Marc while lamented he couldn't punish him, not that he didn't deserve it in his assessment which was made by virtue of mind reading. If someone here doesn't think that kind of insult affects Marquez they are absolutely wrong (at best).
Edit: it's as if none of us learned .... from Stoner's departure from the sport. Destined to repeat the same mistakes because of our human condition. Funny how we never identify with the bully, and when asked, we always say we would be against the bully. We are never the problem, are we?
Rossi would go ballistic if the sport made him go though half the .... Stoner and now Marquez will be subjected to, if the sport had the balls to call him a ....... petulant capricious .... who enjoyed unfair advantages to artificially pad his record. ...., the guy has threatened to leave more times than I can keep track off, most recently at Valencia over a "penalty" he deserved. The dynamic of confidence and self entitlement for which VR enters seasons is deafening! Who here doesn't think that plays a roll in his advantage, if we keep repeating racing is mostly mental. Rossi goes in to every season knowing as Herve Poncharal said "He is 'our' Emporer!"
Frankly, how could Rossi not think that, he's never been told otherwise from anybody of status. Enablers.
Btw, with all do respect, telling someone to stop watching because we acknowledge the ........ is as much a cheapshot as telling you your journalistic integrity is questionable because you're beholden to the organizer's puppet strings. I read you because I don't believe that, and watch GP despite that I do.