Rivas' two-race suspension gave much pause for thought. Two years ago, at Phillip Island in 2011, in a similar incident, Marc Marquez had rammed into the back of Ratthapark Wilairot at high speed, as Wilairot was cruising around the track after the flag had been waved to signal the end of the session. Marquez knew he was no longer on a hot race track, with riders focused on setting the fastest time possible, yet he continued to lap at very high speed, as he had been asked to by his team. Marquez, however, was penalized by having a minute added to his qualifying time, putting the Spaniard on the back of the grid. Rivas, for a similarly dangerous violation of the rules of behavior after the end of a session, was handed down a two-race ban.
When confronted with the discrepancy,
Marquez was at pains to point out that he believed the two incidents were not the same. 'I think it was a little bit different,' Marquez said. 'On the lap in Australia, yes I was fast, but also Wilairot was so slow on the line, was with first gear. So it was my mistake, but it was also his mistake, because OK, it is the finish lap, but you cannot go with first gear round all the circuit. And Dani Rivas was completely different. You know that there they practice the start, and he was talking with another rider, so that is dangerous. In the end, Race Direction take that decision, maybe one race was enough, but it was a dangerous moment for all the riders, because in the end he touched just two or three riders, but there were many riders there.'
While the decision reeks of class justice - it is easy to hand Dani Rivas, who plays no real role in the championship, a two-race ban, whereas punishing a championship contender would cause a lot more trouble, and create a lot more protest - the penalty imposed
is also perhaps the sign of the new Race Direction signaling a change of direction. The penalty on Rivas, as well as the penalty points for Marquez for his crash at Silverstone, caused when still pushing hard as yellow flags were being waved, look more like Mike Webb seizing the opportunity offered him by the new points system to make a point: dangerous riding simply will not be tolerated, unlike before. The penalty on Marquez had been imposed under the former Race Director Paul Butler, who retired at the end of 2011. Mike Webb wants to take MotoGP in
a slightly different direction, and looks to be imposing stiffer penalties. Despite that, some feel that Marquez deserved more of a punishment for his behavior at Silverstone. The trouble is, it would be a very brave man who would impose a one-race ban on Marc Marquez, as the young Spaniard is widely regarded as the savior of MotoGP, and the darling of Dorna and the Spanish media and fans. And with Dorna CEO Carmelo Ezpeleta's right hand man Javier Alonso also part of Race Direction, pushing through tougher penalties may be tougher than it seems. We shall see how this story develops over the next few months.
http://motomatters.com/analysis/2013/09/13/2013_misano_motogp_friday_round_up_yamah.html
(Bunch of words & thoughts ahead, feel free to skip)
Breathtaking. I wonder if the reporter asking him the question (and others "adults" present) called him out for complete and utter nonsense and ......... What a
disconnect with reality with this kid, surely a
reflection of:his golden status, preponderance of journalist unwilling to call him out and throw hardball follow up questions, paddock insider indifference--this perhaps as Krops suggest is cowardice to stand up to the League, Race Direction's consistent willingness to turn a blind eye, the arrogance by his handlers in his Moto2 garage (surely still
some of the same influential voices in his present garage) and the current willingness to describe this year's transgressions as "exciting riding" (ie ramming Lorenzo at Jerez). Marc slammed into Wilairot AFTER the ....... flag, when riders are supposed to loosen the throttle and slow the hell down, and he has the balls to say, well the Thai rider bears some fault? Are you ....... kidding me?! (Who here agrees with this sentiment of Marc's, name yourself so I can lose all respect for you too.) The rider next to Wilairot was also going slow, because they had heeded the flag indicating the session was OVER. Any "expert" commentator with a shred of integrity should be ashamed to entertain this ........ rationalization by Marquez. The next word out of the reporter hearing this weak ... justification and rationalization should have said "........ son, you ...... up royally and almost killed a man and should have been made to sit out the rest of the season to reflect on your stupid ...! Grow the .... up!" Jesus, I honestly want to like this kid, but here he was given an opportunity to redeem himself a bit and failed. How about accepting responsibility, saying perhaps he got off easy and expressing remorse, maybe saying something like, u know I was a teenager and I ...... up, I did something stupid, this would have gone a long way with me. (He is still a kid I guess but ...., blaming the victim?--.... you man.)
Krops, thanks for giving this inconsistency a couple of paragraphs at the end of your round up, though for my taste you still presented it with kiddy gloves, I understand you have to be more professional on your site. Thanks for having the presence of mind to also describe the "new" tone of race direction with the caveats and conditions of "perhaps" and "slightly" new direction. Yeah, I'd also be very tentative in describing this supposed "new" race direction, as frankly other than issuing a weak "warning" to Marc for attempted murder on marshals (which is basically what this ........ "penalty points" system is, NOT an actual 'punishment' for
flagrant disregard of yellow caution flags); nothing substantive has 'actually' been done to thwart his consistently dangerous behavior. And why would it, ...., had he read this forum after he rammed Lorenzo, he would have found most applauding the move as exciting. I don't think there is a "new" tone for race direction at all, and you pretty much touched on the reasons why: class justice. Basically penalties are issued to grid fillers and riders inconsequential to the championship. These are the 'nobodies' whose lives and participation is only useful to the League to provide the appearance of an authentic competition. Hell, this 2 race ban is simply part of this facade, that somebody is looking out for the safety of the sport (though those of us watching and understanding it with some scrutiny are not fooled) We should call this class of riders, the CRT-class of faceless young men who, despite dedicating and risking life, limb, and fortune to the sport, their plight is of no value to the League other than filling the grid spots for our entertainment. Wilairot's career, though at the time had flashes of some brilliance, has not been the same since this crash. Those who can shrug their shoulders at such dastard inconsistency for these participants have simply not paused to think and really empathized how you might feel if this had been your favorite rider being torpedoed. What might we feel had Wilairot rammed into Marquez and effectively destroyed his career? Certainly the images from the hospital bed may have moved us, or would we be more moved if a title contender was eliminated from our entertainment?
Regardless of this ........ penalty points system which in affect
allows fouls to go decidedly 'unpunished' (breathtaking deterrent this, where one screw up can mean yours or others careers or worse),I maintain perhaps the only pause for reflection this kid has heeded so far has come from the likely word of caution (regardless of motive, magnitude, wisdom, strategy or otherwise) given by somebody in his sphere of influence, perhaps moved by his even further elevated status and profile at HRC (and now that my admired friend Arrabi has given me license to say it "feasible", the likelihood that this occurred at some point to a "rookie" is not only decidedly one-hundred percent probable, but normally the ongoing order of the day for any "new" additions to a premier class, hence the connotation of "rookie", and frankly baffling its even debatable to consider no wisdom would be imparted in such a circumstance. And where else would such wisdom be best employed but on the track, regardless of the magnitude and consistency of employing such wisdom). This kid has displayed fantastic talent and exhibited a propensity to be seemingly unaware of mortality, reenforced by those cheering on reckless tactics and dismissing his dangerous maneuvers in the past in exchange for the thrills he provides on the track, BUT he ain't stupid; as they say, nothing focuses the mind like the prospect of a hanging, or in this case spectacularly ....... up yourself or another title contender, especially one employed by your employer, that and the realities that DNFs are bad for championships. It seems to me Marc has been riding more calculated, patient, and though still enthusiastically aggressive its been noticeably measured, that is in the context of a previous propensity to barge through. I'm sure the learning curve he has displayed and his progression, as all rookies experience, as the season transpires is multifaceted, from working with a new team, learning the machine, tires and its characteristics, to adapting to the propensities of his rivals, etc., moreover, certainly part of this advancement in growth and understanding has surely come from advice rendered by those who would impart such wisdom. It would seem ludicrous to believe that the kid could internalize and react to all the technical and nuanced aspects of competing against his rivals on the track while shunting universal insight about successful competition.