I think his point may have been that your attitude in terms of fairness is different in relation to an athlete you like/support than it is to Stoner. Brady is a failure as well in your terms as you apply them to GP bike racing since he has failed to win the title more than he has won it, even though like Stoner regardless of his equipment the Patriots usually perform creditably regardless of the apparent strength of their roster or injuries or as is the case this year suspensions.Stay on point. I know how you love to deflect to other topics when your floundering for facts. This is about that cheater Tom Brady.
You know nothing if your linking articles from NFL.com.
Thats like asking Nick Harris for an unbiased assessment of Rossi. While you were there, did you read any articles about the effects of concussions? There was never any evidence. Zero, none, zilch.
Ted Wells was paid millions to come up with that "independent" report you quoted. Did you read the science portion of that report? Of course not because there was no science in the report. Ted Wells refused to investigate it.
As an engineer who makes his living off of science, one would think that would throw up red flags.
The NFL did investigate the science behind ball pressure last year though. Why would the do that if they were sure there was no science involved in deflategate. Makes sense right. We're going to suspend a player without 1 shred of evidence, disavow the Ideal gas law that states ball pressure changes with air temperature, but hold our own investigation just to see if we were wrong.
Do you know what they concluded? Of course you don't because you refuse to read the facts, no one knows what they concluded because they will not release the data. As you said to others about Brexit. Maybe you should shut the .... up about a sport you have a passing interest in.
Is John Elway a quitter btw for retiring straight after he won his 2nd Super Bowl and apparently feeling fulfilled by just 2 titles?
Last edited: