MarquezMatters.cum
- Thread starter Jumkie
- Start date
-
- Tags
- marquezmatterscum
Well in Krop's defense, I think he would be writing about any rider at the moment who happens to take MotoGP by storm. Isn't that what journalists do? Gush over whoever is winning/making the headlines? All journalists tend to have hard-ons (or the female equivalent) about various people they write a lot about. Journalists tend to be fans as well, else what would motivate them to write about the subjects they do write about?
I thought the article was good.
The weight, power and fragile electronics increase the danger of MotoGP. The control tires are dangerous because they require full attack to reach operating temp, though they are better than before. Dorna knows the riders must be kept on a tight leash, but as Lorenzo pointed out, the media people love crash highlights.
The sport has never made more money, yet GP is in terrible condition. The laws of the land are broken. The MSMA need to step up.
The weight, power and fragile electronics increase the danger of MotoGP. The control tires are dangerous because they require full attack to reach operating temp, though they are better than before. Dorna knows the riders must be kept on a tight leash, but as Lorenzo pointed out, the media people love crash highlights.
The sport has never made more money, yet GP is in terrible condition. The laws of the land are broken. The MSMA need to step up.
Joined Aug 2008
6K Posts | 748+
Thailand
la-pirata
jum and i have 'engaged' on many occasions over my time here, hence my .... d signature on the post. its jums pet name for me. Jum and i have also had many pleasant exchanges but you'll never find that out being the forum's current hucklebury hound.chopperman
when the track announcer said restart and only 12 laps wifey and i were 'what d ....' but track clean up took some time. I said to her mgp will probably start late say 4:20 (no not 4:20, get your head outta that bong!). Then realized the big bikes were going on at 4 come hell or high water knew it was a tv thang.
Jumkie
Just another example of you being so sure you are right, while being so, so wrong.
I've no idea who the pirate is, it certainly isn't me. Just like Bryan isn't me, but you tell a lie often enough and get enough of your jism-swallowers to agree with you and your fanboy base grows accordingly.
I would have found it hard to post this weekend, I spent it at the races.
Nice to see nothing has changed though, you are still a gobby bully with a following of other less gobby bullies.
Driven away another contributor, eh? Not surprised. Maybe one day you will look back and realise that the only people on here are the ones that agree with you - probably your ideal society - but the conversation is .....
The prevailing attitude that 'if you ain't tough enough' just sucks. It is a place for discussion, not for a fight. If I wanted a fight I have a wife that is more than happy to accommodate me and enough American conservative sites to sink an aircraft carrier.
It must be nice to be you, and be right ALL THE TIME. Personally, I get about two sentences into your long diatribes and just switch off - most of the time you just talk .... in so much volume as to drown out any possible disagreement.
A bully and a .... - describes you admirably.
Later.
Just another example of you being so sure you are right, while being so, so wrong.
I've no idea who the pirate is, it certainly isn't me. Just like Bryan isn't me, but you tell a lie often enough and get enough of your jism-swallowers to agree with you and your fanboy base grows accordingly.
I would have found it hard to post this weekend, I spent it at the races.
Nice to see nothing has changed though, you are still a gobby bully with a following of other less gobby bullies.
Driven away another contributor, eh? Not surprised. Maybe one day you will look back and realise that the only people on here are the ones that agree with you - probably your ideal society - but the conversation is .....
The prevailing attitude that 'if you ain't tough enough' just sucks. It is a place for discussion, not for a fight. If I wanted a fight I have a wife that is more than happy to accommodate me and enough American conservative sites to sink an aircraft carrier.
It must be nice to be you, and be right ALL THE TIME. Personally, I get about two sentences into your long diatribes and just switch off - most of the time you just talk .... in so much volume as to drown out any possible disagreement.
A bully and a .... - describes you admirably.
Later.
chopperman
Are you back, ..........?
Might be just enough to make me want to stick around and hand you your ignorant ... again. Still beating the wife?
Are you back, ..........?
Might be just enough to make me want to stick around and hand you your ignorant ... again. Still beating the wife?
la-pirata
Interestingly, you couldn't be more wrong, not only about this forum, but in particular about many of the participants. What you seemingly don't realize is that many on here are quite a bit more than forum alias's. Many of us know one another personally and have spent time with one another at various GP events. You know virtually nothing of what you speak.
Sure, Jum gets carried away often enough. We're all well acquainted with his diatribes. But here's the part you don't get. We don't speak out because we know better. We know EXACTLY who we're dealing with. We know the man, well in fact. We've seen guys like you come and go and I can promise you that when you leave, which you most certainly will, 18 seconds later the forum will carry on as though you never made a single post.
You have two options.
1. Leave now
2. Quiet down for a bit, pay close attention and make meaningful contributions.
Do you think you're the first guy that came on here and got shat upon? Stay or go, nobody here will carry water for your cause. Understand that now. Even those who don't agree with Jum, who've been here long enough know your half-life is about 20 days tops.
Interestingly, you couldn't be more wrong, not only about this forum, but in particular about many of the participants. What you seemingly don't realize is that many on here are quite a bit more than forum alias's. Many of us know one another personally and have spent time with one another at various GP events. You know virtually nothing of what you speak.
Sure, Jum gets carried away often enough. We're all well acquainted with his diatribes. But here's the part you don't get. We don't speak out because we know better. We know EXACTLY who we're dealing with. We know the man, well in fact. We've seen guys like you come and go and I can promise you that when you leave, which you most certainly will, 18 seconds later the forum will carry on as though you never made a single post.
You have two options.
1. Leave now
2. Quiet down for a bit, pay close attention and make meaningful contributions.
Do you think you're the first guy that came on here and got shat upon? Stay or go, nobody here will carry water for your cause. Understand that now. Even those who don't agree with Jum, who've been here long enough know your half-life is about 20 days tops.
Joined Jun 2007
10K Posts | 1K+
Norah Head
Jumkie
Wow !!! best post you ever made Cumkie. 180 degrees, look in the mirror, arse-about wrong as usual still though, but ......... I was able to read it all without falling asleep!!!
Wow !!! best post you ever made Cumkie. 180 degrees, look in the mirror, arse-about wrong as usual still though, but ......... I was able to read it all without falling asleep!!!
Joined Oct 2006
25K Posts | 4K+
Your Mom's House
Kropo, my apologies for laying it on think. Sometimes I do lose sight of the 'human' factor when writing a rebuttal. I'm sure if I were arguing with you in person, I'd still have the same takes, without the vitriol that a forum lends me. Just like I doubt you would have told Lorenzo he was acting out a "bizarre outburst" when employing common sarcasm to make a point, though you gave yourself the liberty of characterizing it with the negative connotation when you put thought to words. I still stand by my disagreements with your takes above and the characterization you have given them. Which in my estimation, leaves your opinions/view/judgement of specific episodes open to challenge by a fan such as myself.
I'll highlight something else here, my reciprocation to you offering us a personal private insight (which I already knew about, as you mentioned once, you struggle with hanging up the boots in reporting for various reasons, one of which is the grief of it all). You're not the only one who struggles with personal insecurities. I've often wished I was more like the positive people in my life. I wish I was more like them and less like me. Its a curse.
Kropotkin
Kropotkin
Kropotkin
I'll highlight something else here, my reciprocation to you offering us a personal private insight (which I already knew about, as you mentioned once, you struggle with hanging up the boots in reporting for various reasons, one of which is the grief of it all). You're not the only one who struggles with personal insecurities. I've often wished I was more like the positive people in my life. I wish I was more like them and less like me. Its a curse.
Kropotkin
Interesting, because I find PS as my outlet and my soap box. But here you are exaggerating. The premise of PS as a collective is not that MotoGP is fixed, that is the domain of a few of us, like me. (And of those of us, to differing degrees). Predetermined? Depends what you are talking about. If you mean every race result, then no, however if you are not going to acknowledge that the cluster for which a win will emanate for any given event (in affect the contenders are fixed, loose use of both senses of the word) is for all intents a predetermined cluster, of which it has been influenced by the League directly and indirectly, then either you are mistaken, fooled, or exaggerating here to make the wrong point. Here is what I marvel about with you specifically, I bet our political views and outlook upon the world are remarkably similar, that is, specifically we perceive the world's ruling class and its machinates for power and control generally analogous. (Yes, I'm assuming based on the body of posts you have made). You have even posted here the peculiar (and I'd say common) view of executives of large powerful entities and the schemes they employ given their understanding of contestants and spectator attributes to specifically exploit them. Simply put, they know contestants will put their ..... on the line for free and risk life and limb for it, while the spectators, for the most part demand entertainment and few pay attention to the particulars of authentic competition. Why oh why then would you argue/believe Dorna (Carmelo) be above this paradigm?! Pointing it out for GP doesn't make me a Calvinistic faithful given what I am proposing is a microcosm of the reality of our world. You are proposing Dorna is not a microcosm of the world. I find that an untenable position. (Oh, and no, Carmelo isn't blamed for 'everything' just the specific .... we can make a reasonable case he influence for a particular purpose).
Kropotkin
I suffer from being a .... on the forum. Do you know how much I cringe knowing people who I know and count as friends read the .... I write? I'm being as serious as you. I'm in constant consternation about how "passionate" (that's my excuse for vitriolic) or "impassionate" (that's my excuse for passionate) I should be when expressing a particular opinion I honestly care about and those that would disagree with me. Which anybody who has lurked a day here knows it to be: Spanish-centric favoritism, VR-centric favoritism, the League's interference, and Nicky Hayden. Unlike you though, I need this place. I honestly think its an addiction. My wife has said as much, I refuse to admit it, but in rare moments of clarity, I think she is right.
Kropotkin
No, not paranoid, you're just joking. But as it were, jokes are seeded in partial truth, which often impart an erudite message. As you said, the demands of those share holders in the form of TV contracts are exceedingly weighty. The "show" must go on. You would think then it wouldn't/ shouldn't be described as 'paranoia' (or its cousin "conspiracy theorist") to point out those executives would acquiesce to 'behind the scenes' demands for "the show". Interesting, don't you think?
Joined Jun 2007
10K Posts | 1K+
Norah Head
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote1381724994
So we are talking about a public forum, a hand full of you know each other, many I have been shat upon by Jum and bullied off, its a clicky club and if I don't tow the Jumkie line I should leave, and I know nothing of what I speak, well I think I got it spot on, this should be a site for all, not just you and your hand full of bully buddies.
Joined Jun 2007
10K Posts | 1K+
Norah Head
I thought Cumkie said I was the pirate ...... or was I BJC? or Zoot? or Dr No?
Yeah I was right ..... remember when the pirate submitted a shot of his tattoo to prove who he was ........ so I posted mine ....
and was immediately set upon by the metrosexual pansies on here who shave their arms whilst going all Brasil down under.
Yeah I was right ..... remember when the pirate submitted a shot of his tattoo to prove who he was ........ so I posted mine ....
and was immediately set upon by the metrosexual pansies on here who shave their arms whilst going all Brasil down under.
Joined Oct 2012
3K Posts | 725+
Crab Key
la-pirata
It would be interesting to see just whom you categorise as "bully buddies"? Care to list them so we (or I) can have a bit of a chortle?
Oh and No one has asked you to leave. (or I've missed it).
¿Why are you so upset?
Dear Little Sausage Avatar,
It would be interesting to see just whom you categorise as "bully buddies"? Care to list them so we (or I) can have a bit of a chortle?
Oh and No one has asked you to leave. (or I've missed it).
¿Why are you so upset?
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote1381740447
Yes you missed it, go and have a read.
Its a Chorizo.
If someone has a view that Jum does not like, he writes pages of insulting garb, doing his best to make a newcomer to the forum feel inadequate and ...., then when the newcomer fires back, he is then attacked by jonnyfuckwit, and any of Jums sock puppets and now chopper, who has admitted he was asked to come back, and then went straight on the Dorna attack, Krops has been on saying he finds coming on here depressing now, though he used to take the time to join in until Jum tried to tear him to bits, Zoot came back and confirmed the above, how fair is it that Jum dictates the direction of this forum.
Yes you missed it, go and have a read.
Its a Chorizo.
Joined Aug 2008
6K Posts | 748+
Thailand
la-pirata
This rediqulous La P. This is not NPR or an integrated public school. It is a PRIVATELY owned entity and the past and present owners seem happy enough. It is a virtually unmoderated adult forum. You are left to your own emotional and intellectual devices. The core feel of PS was established 7 - 8 years ago and its is very doubtful your protestations will amount to anything other than your own, obviously bitter posts. Yeah, most of us were baptised by PS fire and survived. If you r looking for a forum of gentle equality you are definitely in the wrong place.
Similar threads
