I spotted this right away and it seems pretty clear that Rossi came from behind Dovi and passed while flags were out, it was even replayed on the TV. I don't know the justification for him not getting a penalty is.
What r u talking about Tom. Justification? Buddy, theres precedent for this, thats all the justification u need.
Pedrosa and Simoncelli approached the turn side-by-side. Being on the inside meant Pedrosa had to brake earlier to make the apex; at tip in, Pedrosa's visual path to the apex was clear and he could not have known that Simoncelli had decided he was going to sweep in from the right at high speed. Since Pedrosa was committed and in a full lean, by the time he saw Simoncelli coming in he had to sit up to brake (basically doing what you're suggesting, "give up the fight"). But since Simoncelli did not give Pedrosa enough room, Pedrosa couldn't stand it up and slow down fast enough.
The line between racing incident and illegal contact is one of intention, and since Simoncelli approached the apex from the outside of Pedrosa, he could see what Pedrosa was doing but not the other way around, and so it should have been Simoncelli who ceded the apex to Pedrosa.
I missed this one but what a crazy season so far, poor Pedro, and I used to hate the guy after he took out Nicky. Honda did good by picking up Stoner, Pedro's body just doesn't seem to hold up to all the abuse of motogp. At this point it's looking like Honda is finally going to get an 800cc championship. Yamaha needs to hurry up with it's engine updates, I hope the I4 isn't really topped out and there's room for improvement.
1. I would hate to go on a personal war against anyone. But you started with the patronizing tone and unwanted advice and an equally stupid analogy. I think it it is so easy when you run out of arguments to just say - I have been here longer than you and know more. I have seen you do that multiple times invalidating every one else's opinion with your more valid experience
And I would like to know what are the foolish assertions in your opinion I have made since I landed at PS?
You would just argue blindly even when the facts are totally against you (Just go through estoril race where you were certain Stoner lost a lot of seconds due to Sic, o the ducati 1000cc test which you still believe as cheating even after the MSMA clarified it) or come up with a lot of melodrama and side step the debate. I am yet to see any good counter point from you. If you want an example look at your reply above - as vague as it can get.
I don't need/wish to bring bonafides to the table as I don't gloat over my life's achievements in an internet forum like you.
You sure seem to be an insecure person as you have to point out your expertise in anything under discussion.
there was an article i read end of last yearwith furuwasa, he was saying the upgrade for extra power on a longlife engine was a big problem..... in testing they blew many engines and cooling was a big issue also.
im thinking there is very little HP they could rinse out of that motor without sacrificing reliability.
hats off to honda they have really turned up the heat, if this translates well to the 1000cc there gonna be onit next season to.
This will probably be more problematic if they are an engine down after the warm up crash. No doubt the engine would have some miles on it but by just basic numbers it should have 50% of another 2 race meetings of work to do.
If they need to sacrifice a bit of reliability to gain HP than this is the worst scenario to be in.
^What's up with your signature by the way? False prediction?
Not to side track, but what's up with spies?
because that's how it's pronounced.
Phonetically written : horgay lorentho.
Not all peeps speak phonetically - mostly just the good ol' US of A
On Pedrosa, not his fault but he is too fragile...shame really.
Well done Rossi and Ducati!
Pedrosa has bones like every other man on earth (maybe he has more titanium plates than most). At that speed, I am sure that your or my collarbone would have broken just a easily....it is not a very thick bone. Anyway, shame.
If Dani continued the corner on the line he initially had taken there wouldn't have been an incident.
1. It's not personal. A person might in fact take on the voice of the patron - when faced with debating someone who is so child like.
2. When I'm wrong - I admit it. You on the other hand like so many internet experts - never do
3. You can't see what you won't examine
4. You don't wish to point out any foundation of knowledge of the sport that might make anything you say seem credible - because said foundation does not exist. You know .... all about racing.
5. That someone with real life experience, and 30 years of following the sport might be more insightful than some arm-chair, internet twit who's never actually attended a race is so patently obvious but no doubt you'll argue otherwise and think yourself
clever for having done so.
A person might in fact take on the voice of the patron - when faced with debating someone who is so child like.