This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

INDY 2010: prediction, practice, qual

He has gone to exaggerated lengths not to crash into anyone since he has been a ducati factory rider. I think he has been overly polite.



Tiger.Card_.jpg
 
I personally think both were racing incidents, if close to the edge. Nevertheless stoner would have been t-boned on the racing line by a bike/rider which/who had left the track if he had not given way. (EDIT He was in front by slewing across stoner out of control.)

Depends where you start viewing the incident mike. It all started on the blind uphill approach to the corkscrew. Stoner and rossi actually swapped paint there too. Rossi being the first into the first apex. Im not sure why were talking about this , i think we have both strayed away from the original point and defiantly the thread topic
<
<
 
Depends where you start viewing the incident mike. It all started on the blind uphill approach to the corkscrew. Stoner and rossi actually swapped paint there too. Rossi being the first into the first apex. Im not sure why were talking about this , i think we have both strayed away from the original point and defiantly the thread topic
<
<

Definitely very far from the topic; lorenzo will likely win indy, not valentino or casey unfortunately in my view.



Valentino squeezed casey fairly severely to the inside initially a corner or two before when casey was definitely in front though. Valentino was also the one who of necessity was in duff-up mode for which I would not necessarily criticise him; my point is the differential reaction to (racing) incidents dependng on the protagonist rather than the incidents themselves.
 
EASY disliked by everyone who thinks what he did are the actions of a total moron! disliked by whom?......lol wake up son. Stoner is a whiner, a spoilt bratt, a sore loser....and somebody who i have NEVER in my life seen to blame a bad performance or any racing situation on simply "i'm having a bad day" or "he was the better guy on the day".............The teams fault, the tracks fault, the bikes fault, the wrists fault, the lactose intolerance(erm...)....you get the picture.



Just accept that he has a bad rep amongst a good chunk for good reason.



I find it humerous the amount of stoner fanboys defending caseys honour here......he pulls a total arsewipe manouver, and you lot jump on board to defend little caseys honour.....yet these are indefensible actions.



Best you guys can come up with is "they wanted to get a free tow".........oh lol seriously.



Sounds a bit like bs and double standards to me.......boppers?



Okay... it's official. Yer a Bopper. Big surprise.
<
 
Definitely very far from the topic; lorenzo will likely win indy, not valentino or casey unfortunately in my view.



Valentino squeezed casey fairly severely to the inside initially a corner or two before when casey was definitely in front though. Valentino was also the one who of necessity was in duff-up mode for which I would not necessarily criticise him; my point is the differential reaction to (racing) incidents dependng on the protagonist rather than the incidents themselves.

check the paint swap at 45 sec. that's the approach pushing rossi off his line. this is where the chain of events happened and why i think casey was a prick for moaning.

Now check at 48 secs and see who is at the first apex in front and the gap between them. casey had plenty of opportunity to sit back and watch rossi crash. He didn't, he went for it there and then and it cost him. I believe he was angry at himself but as we all know he will always pass the blame.



[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfPM77TsGaA[/media]



As for Lorenzo at indy, i think your right about him winning although spies was 2 tenths faster. can he keep this speed through race distance ?? unlikely. i got a feeling engines may start to play a part now. an engine blow could upset a lot of things for a lot of people. Lorenzo must be on his last engine by know ??
 
Rossi up for another disaster race. I hope he can save something out of this situation.

I dont have any doubt that Spies will join the aliens, and that's the biggest or one of the biggest positive points of this year. I hope he will score some more podiums, and find more conffidence for the next year.



3 hours to go, give us an exciting race.
 
check the paint swap at 45 sec. that's the approach pushing rossi off his line. this is where the chain of events happened and why i think casey was a prick for moaning.

Now check at 48 secs and see who is at the first apex in front and the gap between them. casey had plenty of opportunity to sit back and watch rossi crash. He didn't, he went for it there and then and it cost him. I believe he was angry at himself but as we all know he will always pass the blame.

I see you have started a race thread, which would seem to be an excellent idea.



We appear to be talking at cross purposes. You have been following premier class racing for a similar length of time to me

( doubtless with greater knowledge), and I am surprised if you have any problem with paint swapping; I certainly don't. My point is that casey stoner believes valentino is allowed greater tolerance in this aspect than he is; this is not a supposition but something he has clearly expressed, not least post-laguna seca 2008. It is not necessarily constructive for him to have this view, and certainly not constructive for him to express it, but I can understand why he feels this way.
 
Personally, I am no more a 'Casey fan boy' as I am a 'Rossi fan boy' - and that's my point - why this diametric opposition? why do you have to perceive that everyone on here subscribes to this simplistic notion of 'either or'. I see both for their phenomenal talent, just as I am not blinded to their negative sides. Sure Casey is outspoken, and at times petulant childish brat. You have cited many reasons as to why this is true. I'd be fascinated to see your response had he emulated Repsol Honda with a divisive wall, delivered a 'me or him' ultimatum to his employers over his teammate. Both Nicky Hayden and Marco Melandri heap nothing but praise upon him as a teammate. The magnitude of his talent was overwhelmingly obvious when his connecting flight was delayed en route to Qatar in 2006 for his second ever Moto GP race, and his luggage went astray while he slept on the floor of the airport. Having gone on to place the LCR Honda on pole he became the youngest pole sitter since Spencer. His fifth in the race having led it for two thirds of the distance was down to tyre degradation, not being able to benefit at LCR from the Saturday night specials as others did. His travel woes only became public knowledge over the next few weeks. The prevailing view during 2007 was that he had the best bike on the grid. This accusation peculiarly wasn't leveled at Vale by the same fraternity concerning the invincible RCV211v during 2002, 2003, and the yam in 2005, but in 2006 we were incessantly reminded what a handicap the M1 had again become. Valentino has ascended to command immense power through his extraordinary talent and showmanship - this has availed him with access to resources and factory assistance beyond the reach of his his counterparts - perhaps one could contend he has earned this right.



I have watched Valentino intently since his inaugural season in 1996. He has consistently been an ambassador for this sport, and indisputably as the greatest rider of all time honorably and humbly acknowledged and revered those that preceded him and has always paid his respects to the rich history of Motorcycle racing. That said, he too can in fact be a sore loser, and he is also prone to spiteful disrespectful jibes at his opposition, which are invariably dismissed as mischievous harmless pranks, and any negatives are swept under the carpet by the Rossi PR machine. In spite of some scathing attacks by the Italian sporting press which are unavoidable, he remains the darling of the paddock as much through his marketing juggernaut as he does through his personality. He has also gone back on his word on several occasions. I greatly respect courage of conviction and sincerity. I don't always detect that integrity in Valentino. His decision to ride the Yam under Altadis sponsorship was an uneasy one, but nonetheless promoting the brands Gauloises and Camel was completely against all that he had previously pledged. As Rog says, it will be interesting to see how the Philip Morris backing at Ducati resolves itself next year and what stance Rossi will take on this.



The varied testimonies of Marco Melandri on the character of the man, (who was very close to him at one time), makes interesting reading, Do some homework - they are easy to find





I read the first couple of sentences only because i could see where you were going with this, but suffice to say.......its not about one or another. I just find it amazing the sheer amount of people willing to defend a move like what we witnessed yesterday, and then try and jump down other peoples throats for "only seeing the good" in rossi.



Just hypocrasy at its finest.



People can support who they like, no matter what next mans opinions of that person may be, however when all you see is people blasting rossi fans for this very same kind behaviour(blind support of valentino through thick and thin) it just makes you laugh with the sheer irony.



Reasons for liking valentino...



simple....i have never seen another rider like him on the track, and he always makes time to smile and bring a positive vibe to the proceedings, nothing to do with all his bs antics and celebrations etc, i also never claimed him to be an angel off the track.



Reason i dislike stoner....



All i hear is excuses, moaning, petulant stunts like that yesterday, and general negativity towards everything when he doesnt do well. As a racer he can be awsome mind you.



If that makes me a bopper then get me the paperwork and i'll sign it and become an official member.



That dont take away the hypocrasy or irony mind.



And beside all this what does bringing stoner up on acting a .... yesterday, have anything to do with bopperism? or rossi? Sorry if my ltd knowledge doesnt fully get what bopperism is, but maybe because thats because the lines are so blurred.
<
<




Funny stuff
<
 
tell that to the corner workers with dirt rake duty!!!
<

I did say crash into anyone; to my knowledge rather than him crashing into pre-existing rakers of dirt any such dirt-rakers have have been called into action subsequent to him crashing. In fact at laguna seca 2008 when he did eventually put the bike into the sand/ dirt he elected to do so rather than crash into your boy.



I do agree that he appears, metaphorically at least, to have prompted a rather considerable amount of dirt-raking.
 
Just hypocrasy at its finest.

It might help your argument if you had sufficient familiarity with the concept to actually spell hypocrisy correctly, in which case you might not have pretended to be a wide -eyed neophyte unfamiliar with previous discourse on the forum and hence bewlldered by the attitude towards a certain element among rossi fandom.
 
It might help your argument if you were familiar enough with the concept to actually spell hypocrisy correctly, in which case you might not have pretended to be a wide -eyed neophyte unfamiliar with previous discourse on the forum and hence bewlldered by the attitude towards a certain element among rossi fandom.





lol the fact remains.....and so glad my spelling mistake gave you some ammo
<
 

Recent Discussions