<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Mar 9 2008, 02:41 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>pacman opening his trap before thinking , obvious he didnt bother to read any threads before making such a strange statements
Haha, how did I miss this thread? What a gem. Pacman (or should I say
"newbee" who's been here
two years), everybody knows you have to first clear any questions or comments you may have before you create a thread by the
"Committee of Roger Against Pacman’s Trolling Outrageous Comments” (otherwise known as
CRAP TOC). And guess what, I support Roger as the Chairman. Dude, we don't care that you have a life outside of this form, we fully expect, no demand, that you thoroughly read over
ever thread,
every post,
every single word from the time you left on your stupid little vacation until now; had you done this you would not have asked your totally out-of-line ....-stirring question.
We don't care that back when you decided to take a holiday from the forum the
overwhelming tone by many was NOT to praise Casey’s dominant championship performance with the tirade of detractors claiming it was just his Ducati doing all the work. But that is in the past, its NOT like we still have some now wishing Stoner gone since he has single handedly caused the demise of the sport into a
boring procession by announcing they no longer think MotoGP is worth watching.
Nobody is
‘subtly’ claiming on the post race threads that it was a
“set-up issue” that may have caused the would-be-challenger’s
“tires” to
“fall off”. I mean, dude, we have totally gotten
‘past blaming the tires’ and bike power since the
only 'real' challenger to Casey is on Bridgestones now. Of course all that is
in the past (and you would have figured this out had you done your homework and read through every single thread you missed).
Nobody is suggesting any reasons to explain why Stoner is lacking challengers (rather than genuinely fast)
nobody would
dare say there was a
“lacking of data/set-up/tires dropping off” for the would-be-challenger either, to suggest that Stoner has no real competition. So you see why your question was so disturbing?
I'm with Rog on this one, you ARE a ....-stirring troll, and I'll be happy to add that you are also an
........
