you have run an entire line of argument in which you have tried to represent stoner's off , which was not an ill judged passing manoeuvre and which did not take out a championship contender other than himself and was highly unlikely to take out dani in any eventuality whatever his status, as something where stoner in some web of invention should have apologised to dani giving dani the chance of a rejoinder similar to the one stoner made last year, rightly or wrongly; classic straw man logical fallacy, and moreover tying in with birdman's clutching at straws.
As I said, if you wish to argue that stoner should tell himself that his ambition outweighed his talent you might have an argument, although I am not sure it would be good advice to suggest he start talking to himself. He neither intended nor carried out any action to give dani cause for complaint, hence no need for any apology to dani, and no ironic rebounding of his own comment. If he does take somebody out through an egregious error, which he hasn't done since 2006 ( in fact committing no riding error, egregious or otherwise which has had adverse consequences for another rider in that time), then he may be hoist on his own petard and have cause for ironic reflection.