This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Ezpeleta Rossi Will Ride Competitive bike 2013

I think if we separately compiled a list detailing precisely who these members are it would be pretty similar, but although I neither particularly like Rossi or Stoner and as an impartial observer, perhaps a fraction of the length of one which could be drawn up representing the hatred towards Stoner. Hater is indeed a strong word. Few hate Rossi - he is manifestly popular..which has raised the profile of this sport immeasurably. If we are talking hatred - look no further than CS. I am not aware of any rider who has had more genuine levels of hate directed against him than Casey Stoner....not even Phil Reid...or judging from my recent experimental thread not even the ridiculous and tragic figure of Anthony Gobert who clearly has no remorse or compunction concerning his wasted career opportunities and those he has hurt along the way.



For every member on this forum that has called Rossi there must be another ten who have lampooned him for his illness or the frequency of his low sides in 2009 and 2010. Casey was supposedly washed up - finished, given what we now know about the front end of that Ducati his achievements are in hindsight astonishing. At Silverstone on Saturday afternoon he came out on the Riders For Health Stage and was predictably roundly booed by several hundred people adorned in that ...... lurid yellow. The hatred seems to have emerged in 2008 - given that it was the same fraternity booing Pedrosa in 2006 in Parc Ferme at Donington, having beaten Valentino the following year it's not hard to deduce why. The other contributory factor in the UK appears to have been Stoner branding Donington as a '.... circuit' the same year, a fair comment which I actually partially agree with. Since then Casey hasn't exactly acquitted himself well and as a PR nightmare has alienated press, paddock and public alike. He does himself no favours perhaps the post race Laguna outburst was his nadir and I have little time myself for his repeated petulance.



Rog recently posted that there are those who want to see Rossi beaten irrespective of who does it and express a similar dislike for his fans.



Let's cut to the chase - I'm one of those people. Further - I don't like Valentino Rossi. I've thought about Rog's post and admit it. I love seeing Rossi beaten and I have little time for his adoring acolytes. There, I said it....much like being a recusant or a 16th Century heretic - to openly post on a motorcycling racing forum that you dislike Rossi...you might as well declare your membership of the BNP or Ku Klux Clan, admit to being a ........., or even profess a penchant for bestiality.
<




Yet, I am not a hater. I don't hate Rossi. Allow me to elucidate. I love seeing Rossi beaten, but I also love to see him win. Rossi elevated this sport to levels not seen since the Golden Age of the late 80's and early '90s when the gods engaged in titanic battles and we watched in awe. The aliens have similar transcendent levels of talent. When Rossi rode for Yamaha his competitors had to raise their game to untold levels in order to challenge him similarly bringing out unseen reserves in Rossi's abilities. Catalunya 2009 was one of the greatest memorable victories I have ever seen in Grand Prix motorcycle racing, similarly Donington 2005 was perhaps the finest wet weather wins it has been my pleasure to witness. I love it when Rossi is pushed, yet many so called fans were content to see him disappear unassailed and throughout most of 2002 vastly superior machinery. I found it mind numbingly tedious just as I wanted to see Casey challenged last year.



I don't like Valentino Rossi. I said it again. Why? I find his personality and public persona fake, and believe him to be duplicitous, scheming, insincere and disingenuous. Whilst I love his studious devotion to the sport I found his supposed post race acknowledgements/tributes to Ago, Hailwood and Nieto self aggrandising and egotistical and would loved to have invaded the track taking a blowtorch to that ......' ridiculous 25 metre long banner at Assen in 2010 - 100 victories aside. Yeah, I'll reaffirm - I love to see him lose as well.



I don't like Valentino Rossi. His sanctimonious dismissal of tobacco advertising only to hypocritically reap millions from Altadis came together with the tax scandal over which he quickly distanced himself from the dubious Gibo Baldi/Great White management despite being privy and complicit to the entire evasion scam. I found his reaction to Lorenzo and ultimatum to Yamaha both childish and petulant and the wall as pathetic as the one that divided Repsol Honda at Pedrosa's behest. The move to Ducati was one of the most costly, miscalculated and conceited .... ups since Sheene sported a Yamaha T shirt whilst under contract to Suzuki, and the ........ about the shoulder injury astonishing in view of the sheer vitriol vented on Stoner following his Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Rossi's underwhelming performance at Ducati I initially defended. But a year down the line I feel no sympathy - just schadenfreude given the arrogance prior to his signing to Ducati. The move on Gibbers at Jerez was venerated and has gone down in Tavullian lore, but Gibbers had beaten him fairly - I thought it was frankly .... desperate opportunistic riding (which I do hate) - alongside his skittling of Melandri at Motegi and his very very crap move at Jerez in 2011. Had Casey taken Valentino in the same way the forum would have gone into melt down. Finally, I feel the 9 times world champion mantle flatters to deceive and frequently used hyperbole by his fanboys which brings me to......the fans.



No I don't tend to like glory hunters - never had, one of the main reasons I love it when Manchester United lose. I worry for the sport because most of these guys will desert GP when Rossi retires. Ezy is desperate to wring/milk every last drop out of the golden ... that is the Rossi phenomenon and is again intent on manipulating the rules in his favour. This is the first time in his career with the exception of 2004 that he has not enjoyed significant comparative advantage and the fans are deserting in their droves instead of getting behind him. Only the true fans of both Rossi and first and foremost GP motorcycle racing tend to and will remain. I detest the incessant kitsch Aldo Drudi helmet designs, the nauseating yellow paraphernalia that pollutes the crowds and the fickle nature of the bandwagon jumpers. The genuine Rossi fans tend to be true devotees and advocees of the sport



Hate? nah, but there's nothing wrong with a justified dislike. Hate? - put it this way, I'd never gloat or delight in Valentino Rossi crashing a motorcycle out of either a race or practice. That's hate.



Great post Arrab.
 
I dont hate him but im glad he is going. He and a lot of his fans turned motogp into a soap opera.



What.

The.

....?

<




Let me guess, you've been hitting the 'Bath Salts' again?



As I recall....

Stoner was not the one riding around with a ....... blow-up doll on the back seat.

He wasn't the one getting into fistifghts with the opposition.

He never placed a malicious 'Voodoo Curse' on his prior friend.

Stoner has never deliberately run anyone into the gravel.

Stoner never demanded a frigging WALL be installed to handicap his team mate.

Etc.

Etc.

Etc.



You wanna know what turned MotoGP into a ....... soap-opera-circus?

Look at the Yellow Clown, and then look in the frigging mirror.
 
First post.



That post by Arrabatia is the best I have read anywhere in regards to Rossi and the sport. Possibly because it suits the way I feel, but hopefully not.



I always thought that Rossi took the show of emotion Schwantz used to portray, by somehow being able to drag a shitbox over the line in first place, and turned it into a self-serving travesty of what it once was.



Don't, and have never minded Rossi winning ( I can appreciate ability for what it is), but turned the telecast off when the checkers fell at the end.



Same thing I do with Stoner. Amazing rider, as the Qualifying lap at Assen yet again showed.



....but I can do without hearing the ever present opinions of how the world should be according to he and Lorenzo.



As for their love-in tweets......get a room !!!
<






Give me the hatred between rivals that Sheene/Roberts, Lawson/Gardner, Rainey and Schwantz used to exude any day.



I don't care about their personal lives, or the opinions of their fans, or how super their new leathers/helmet designs/bike paint jobs look........I want to see riders who want nothing more than to beat "that ....... over there"



Probably just me though.
 
As long as I can give as much as I get, without, to quote Doohan, people "getting sponsored by Kleen-ex", then all's fair.
<
 
What.

The.

....?

<




Let me guess, you've been hitting the 'Bath Salts' again?



As I recall....

Stoner was not the one riding around with a ....... blow-up doll on the back seat.

He wasn't the one getting into fistifghts with the opposition.

He never placed a malicious 'Voodoo Curse' on his prior friend.

Stoner has never deliberately run anyone into the gravel.

Stoner never demanded a frigging WALL be installed to handicap his team mate.

Etc.

Etc.

Etc.



You wanna know what turned MotoGP into a ....... soap-opera-circus?

Look at the Yellow Clown, and then look in the frigging mirror.

BINGO
<
There you have it folks. As i pointed out in this very thread the Neo bopper generic defence of stoner is to point of negatives of Rossi. None of the above excuses Stoners spoilt brat behaviour so why bring it up? And for your information stoner damn near run nicky off he track at 2011 silverstone round !
 
Btw, if you think the de puniet tap is the most heinous act in bike racing history, and in particular that stoner lost his temper, was dangerous and deserving of multi-race suspension, see if you can find a way to watch last night's wss race as arrabbiata has suggested.



Off topic (and slow off the mark) but can anyone tell me where I might procure (a remotely acceptable quality) video of this supersport race?
 
Off topic (and slow off the mark) but can anyone tell me where I might procure (a remotely acceptable quality) video of this supersport race?

Have a look on the powerslide wsbk forum for the wss aragon thread, there is a good quality video of the actual incident.
 
BINGO
<
There you have it folks. As i pointed out in this very thread the Neo bopper generic defence of stoner is to point of negatives of Rossi. None of the above excuses Stoners spoilt brat behaviour so why bring it up? And for your information stoner damn near run nicky off he track at 2011 silverstone round !

If you argue stoner is a spoilt brat/petulant/whatever no-one can argue, it is your opinion and may have some justification. It is when you embroider things such as by attempting to make him the guilty party for rossi taking him out at jerez, or make him out to be an axe murderer (or kenan sofoglu, the terms would seem synonymous on recent evidence) that I take issue. Rude, petulant, arrogant, whatever, he is one of the safest riders out there along with valentino rossi (is it culpable to say something positive about valentino?).
 
Well i;m pretty sure it wont be Ducati in 2013. From Autosport.com





Ducati believes a planned new engine is the only hope to keep Valentino Rossi

By Michele Lostia and Sam Tremayne Monday, July 2nd 2012, 15:47 GMT





1341244413.jpg
Ducati team boss Vittoriani Guareschi has labelled Ducati's planned new engine as the 'only hope' of convincing Valentino Rossi to stay at the squad, after the seven-time champion expressed his concern that there appeared to be no solution to the team's current struggles.

Guareschi said he wants to retain Rossi for the 2013 season, but admitted time was running out to convince the Italian to stay.

He also said Ducati's new engine was evidence it had not stopped moving forward - something Rossi implied prior to the Dutch TT - but admitted that it has been difficult to accelerate the rate of development given existing deals with suppliers.

"We have never stopped, as demonstrated by the fact that we are working on a reviewed engine that should be ready for Laguna Seca," Guareschi told Gazzetta dello Sport.

"We do our development programs at the beginning of the year, but to accelerate is difficult, because we design in-house, but production is done together with suppliers, over whom we have little chance of intervention.

"Let's hope the engine works, because that's our only hope to convince Valentino to stay. We'd like to keep both him and Nicky, but there isn't much time, because usually the market deals close at Brno."

His comments come in the wake of renewed criticism of Ducati's current situation from Rossi, who said he could see "no solutions" in the team's immediate future.

Rossi, who finished 1.3s down on Casey Stoner in qualifying at Assen even before a rear tyre issue curtailed his race, said the fact Honda brought a new chassis to Holland highlighted the development problems at Ducati.

"Honda, who are already quick so in theory are less in need than we are, have nevertheless brought a new chassis because they believe a lot more work is needed, because they always want to improve," he told Italia1.

"At Ducati, instead, there is no such plan. An engine with different characteristics is forthcoming, but as far as the real problem is concerned, which I've already explained months ago, I see no solutions on the horizon.

"It's not a matter of time, there simply are no ideas to solve the situation. Obviously what we riders say is not taken into consideration.

"I repeat: there's no plan."

While Rossi was cagey on whether top management should be blamed, Guareschi vigorously defended the role of Ducati Corse head Filippo Preziosi.

"Is Preziosi under discussion? Filippo is everything for Ducati and I sincerely struggle to imagine a situation without him at Borgo Panigale."
 
First post.



That post by Arrabatia is the best I have read anywhere in regards to Rossi and the sport. Possibly because it suits the way I feel, but hopefully not.



I always thought that Rossi took the show of emotion Schwantz used to portray, by somehow being able to drag a shitbox over the line in first place, and turned it into a self-serving travesty of what it once was.



Don't, and have never minded Rossi winning ( I can appreciate ability for what it is), but turned the telecast off when the checkers fell at the end.



Same thing I do with Stoner. Amazing rider, as the Qualifying lap at Assen yet again showed.



....but I can do without hearing the ever present opinions of how the world should be according to he and Lorenzo.



As for their love-in tweets......get a room !!!
<






Give me the hatred between rivals that Sheene/Roberts, Lawson/Gardner, Rainey and Schwantz used to exude any day.



I don't care about their personal lives, or the opinions of their fans, or how super their new leathers/helmet designs/bike paint jobs look........I want to see riders who want nothing more than to beat "that ....... over there"



Probably just me though.



Welcome.
 
If you argue stoner is a spoilt brat/petulant/whatever no-one can argue, it is your opinion and may have some justification. It is when you embroider things such as by attempting to make him the guilty party for rossi taking him out at jerez, or make him out to be an axe murderer (or kenan sofoglu, the terms would seem synonymous on recent evidence) that I take issue. Rude, petulant, arrogant, whatever, he is one of the safest riders out there along with valentino rossi (is it culpable to say something positive about valentino?).

The point being. Stoners says or does something seen as negative by some. They post it. The Stoner fans then say "but rossi did bla bla at bla bla". This is the generic response by his fans even though it has nothing to do with what stoner did that caused the debate. Rather than debate the issue of what stoner did or said his neo fans would rather turn the threads into a stoner vs rossi gang fight.



You do debate the issue in hand and don't always give a free pass just because you're a fan, but you do love to cloud the issue with comparing to other riders. 2 wrongs don't make a right as my mum used to say.
 
The point being. Stoners says or does something seen as negative by some. They post it. The Stoner fans then say "but rossi did bla bla at bla bla". This is the generic response by his fans even though it has nothing to do with what stoner did that caused the debate. Rather than debate the issue of what stoner did or said his neo fans would rather turn the threads into a stoner vs rossi gang fight.



You do debate the issue in hand and don't always give a free pass just because you're a fan, but you do love to cloud the issue with comparing to other riders. 2 wrongs don't make a right as my mum used to say.



It's called counterpoint Rog. A two-way street. If fans of rider A. didn't constantly find fault with Rider B's personality. we could all be talking a lot more about actual racing.
 
The point being. Stoners says or does something seen as negative by some. They post it. The Stoner fans then say "but rossi did bla bla at bla bla". This is the generic response by his fans even though it has nothing to do with what stoner did that caused the debate. Rather than debate the issue of what stoner did or said his neo fans would rather turn the threads into a stoner vs rossi gang fight.



You do debate the issue in hand and don't always give a free pass just because you're a fan, but you do love to cloud the issue with comparing to other riders. 2 wrongs don't make a right as my mum used to say.

It is perhaps a fine point, but I am insufficiently hypocritical to criticise rossi for something that I find acceptable in stoner, whether or not you find it unacceptable in stoner. The one deliberate action of rossi's that I find unacceptable was the gibernau thing, not that it was particularly dangerous. All the rest (which are quite few anyway) are racing incidents, and however much you dislike stoner and gibernau, rossi respected their riding enough to run at such close quarters with them, a view he did not seem to hold of tony elias.



In the end perhaps we differ, in that I think bike riders should be judged on what they do when they are racing, rather than how they react afterwards or what they say in the press conference.



i have just argued elsewhere in reply to someone who said that dorna needed to groom the next valentino rossi that this can't be done. He is a one off, a fortunate accident for the popularity of the sport. Whatever the excesses of some of his fans among whom I don't usually include you as you are obviously first a fan of the sport, his talent is hardly ordinary, and riders with anything like his talent have to be taken as they come. You can't exactly pick some random bike racer with a winning personality and a talent for one liners in press conferences and teach them to ride like valentino rossi, and nor can you change someone who doesn't have his personality to be like him. I am glad jorge has given up trying to be so.
 
The point being. Stoners says or does something seen as negative by some. They post it. The Stoner fans then say "but rossi did bla bla at bla bla".



This is the generic response by his fans even though it has nothing to do with what stoner did that caused the debate. Rather than debate the issue of what stoner did or said his neo fans would rather turn the threads into a stoner vs rossi gang fight. You do debate the issue in hand and don't always give a free pass just because you're a fan, but you do love to cloud the issue with comparing to other riders. 2 wrongs don't make a right as my mum used to say.



But Rog, is it any different to the current discussion regarding Bautista?



People are saying 'well, if Bautista is penalised for that indescretion that why was the indiscretion of <insert another rider> not punished>'?



Fact (or is it opinion) remains that Stoner is often pilloried for somments and or actions that have also been done similarly by other riders (some before him, some since), and yet nobody labels the other riders as they do Stoner (and before you type the usual 'but Rossi' response, the same applies equally that way as well).



The simplification is that what we claim as fair for rider A, should also be fair for rider B etc amd that debate is all about point and counterpoint, which often can mean the highlighting of similar acts by one party, for which a second party is not treated equally.
 
Race direction needs to apply sanctions evenly, without fear or favour.



Not to get drawn into the "rider a got this penalty, why didn't rider b ?" pointless debate, but to use as an example.....



Sic on Dani at Le Mans, Marquez on Espargaro....very similar incidents, totally different outcomes.



couldn't care less (for the sake of the point I'm trying to make) which is worse, or the stupidly tiny differences between each incident.



Race direction needs to enforce it's decisions with an even hand.
 

Recent Discussions