Joined May 2009
6K Posts | 4K+
Shovel's Club
What conspiracy theories are those exactly?
How do I say this without being rude? Your whole point of view on Stoner career.
What conspiracy theories are those exactly?
"Yet everyone likes to play cod psychology with Iannone nobodies got a problem with that".
I would say Stoner was the better of the two riders because of an important bit: Stoner ran his bike with the electronics at a very low setting while MM doesn't. It's extremely difficult to run a modern GP bike with the electronics on low settings, and Stoner in particular was actually getting more out of the bike than anyone could with the electronics running high because he could make far more adjustments than the ECU could. What you see MM doing is the product of electronics compensating for quite a bit. Even his vaunted saves when he was on the ground in a low side and managed to pull the bike back up. No one ever talks about the electronics making it possible to open the throttle to get grip back into the tires. The computer was measuring the lean angle and adjusting to allow for the correct amount of power to be put out by the engine. Still takes faith to do it, but don't kid yourself.
So why aren't other people making the same saves Marc does if the electronics are helping him? This years electronics is like 10 steps backward so that really doesn't work. Plus its pretty much a fact that the honda at the beginning of the year was ..... You don't have to debate this just because I asked. It was pretty much a rhetorical question by the time you answered it.
To be fair, what he said was Stoner was angry and shutoff while he was racing and has been relaxed and approachable since he retired.So Dovi, whom Stoner greatly outperformed at HRC and effectively ousted from that team and could have instantly ousted from the Ducati factory team this year had he so chosen even though he had been retired for 2 years, didn't enjoy having Stoner as a team-mate? What a startling revelation.
Him hating everyone shut down and was always angry. I think its safe to say he was mean to people by that comment.
You are only "validating" your own point of view. Dovi never said Stoner was a ..... You are constantly angry at pretty much everybody and nobody is calling you a ..... Stoner had good reasons to be angry at a lot of people. What's your excuse?
I'm the ...... police. I'm here to find ....., twats, and ........
ITs an internet website. If I can't grab a little ..... here than where can I?
You were by implication anyway comparing the application of cod psychology to Iannone, which I personally don't do to Iannone or any other rider anyway, to your application of cod psychology to Stoner, to which I believed their relative success as riders was relevant, given your whole argument which I obviously vehemently and it would seem fairly successfully oppose is that Stoner didn't have the mentality of a champion/was mentally weak etc.How is that me comparing Stoner and AI's career?
Dub, you should re-read the last bit of what I wrote.
And a FYI, Colin Edwards made a lowside save at Catalunya 2008.
I chose to reply because I wanted to.
Throttle control isn't what it was at one time in MotoGP. Now it's perfectly fine to wrench the thing open because the electronics --even the control ECU-- will cover the rider's ... nowadays by limiting power as necessary.
Stoner rode a .... bike for 4 straight years and is the only man in history to ever win a grand prix with a full carbon fiber chassis. That accomplishment alone is incredible.
Very good point Walter
Dubs must be mean because he is angry, thus Dubs must be a .... (and yet I bet there are many people who have had interactions with Dubs who will state outright that he is a top bloke)
To be fair, what he said was Stoner was angry and shutoff while he was racing and has been relaxed and approachable since he retired.
Makes sense. After all, if he were happy and fulfilled in his racing days, Stoner'd still be racing today.
I don't think ascribing a 'sour grapes' motivation to Dovizioso's comment is really justified.
Total ........ dubs and you know it but let that not get in your way of deriding him,
Angry and mean are two distinctly different things as one does not have to be angry to rip the wings from a bird, they are just mean.
One can be angry because the bird shat on them, and sure they may wish harm on that bird but they do nothing short of scream abuse and wave their hands in anger.
Yes, on some occasions one can be both but NOWHERE does Dovi call Stoner mean nor does he state he was mean to people .......... that is you putting words to Dovi's mouth in the hope to have some of the mud stick, and you guy wonder why people take issue
You were by implication anyway comparing the application of cod psychology to Iannone, which I personally don't do to Iannone or any other rider anyway, to your application of cod psychology to Stoner, to which I believed their relative success as riders was relevant, given your whole argument which I obviously vehemently and it would seem fairly successfully oppose is that Stoner didn't have the mentality of a champion/was mentally weak etc.
To be fair, what he said was Stoner was angry and shutoff while he was racing and has been relaxed and approachable since he retired.
Makes sense. After all, if he were happy and fulfilled in his racing days, Stoner'd still be racing today.
I don't think ascribing a 'sour grapes' motivation to Dovizioso's comment is really justified.
He hated everyone. Why would Dovi say that unless he was mean to people?
No, I am disputing you applying it in the first place mainly, and my declaration that it is ridiculous and an inherent contradiction to posit that someone who is a dual world champion did not have the mentality of a champion/was mentally weak, including apparently during the season when Dovi was his team-mate when one of his rather dominant championship wins was accomplished, is a subsidiary point in (lack of ) logic.Aren't you by rebutting my debate playing cod psy with Stoner? You are not stating that you don't like me debating his mental state you are debating his mental state with me. I know you don't like to but you do. And you know I respect your opinion. You also know this will stop when we stop being so serious about it.
I didn't say he hated everyone Dovi did. I said he was mean which is not as bad as hate I thought.If he hated everyone why was he then and remains good friends with Spies, Edwards, Lorenzo, Pedrosa?
And yes, he is mates with those guys as evidenced by social media and the comments of (particularly) Edwards, Spies and Lorenzo.
Easy again however - if you get angry because your bike fails in a MTB event - are you mean to people or just angry?
Angry and mean are two distinctly different things as there has never been comment from journalists (which given how much some enjoyed reporting negativity about Stoner) or team members indicating anything other than intense focus from Stoner. Nowhere has their been comment that he was 'mean' to people by way of putting people down etc (actually, Dovi is likely more mean with his Ianonne comments), but yes there are reports of intensity and focus that can be frightening (Krop once reported the stare as sending chills).
The article to me reads as a native tongue interview translated (not just the Stoner comments but wordings in general) and angry could refer to the manner in which Stoner went about his business at the track and how intense he was, involving few others outside of his immediate team (Dovi was not part of that team). Thus the comparison to now retired Stoner being more relaxed and engaging of others as he is now not competing against them either, he is there to assist
No, I am disputing you applying it in the first place mainly, and my declaration that it is ridiculous and an inherent contradiction to posit that someone who is a dual world champion did not have the mentality of a champion/was mentally weak, including apparently during the season when Dovi was his team-mate when one of his rather dominant championship wins was accomplished, is a subsidiary point in (lack of ) logic.
CE had one great save. Marc does it often. Too often. But ok aside from that Marc has Rossi like race craft, meaning he finds ways to pass board line moves the kind the drive Stoner nuts.
Thing about Stoner and the .... ducati comment is, he didn't do anything different on a honda. Title first year then he couldn't adapt whether it be rules or not. If he can ride the carbon fiber chassis to incredible feats then why didn't he do the better on the honda? It was a little JLo like he was incredible when conditions suited but not always. Marc is incredible nearly always.