<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (johnny @ Jul 30 2009, 06:43 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Sorry to butt in but I think Inam is spot on. Of course Casey should choose what ever tyres he wants in whatever conditions. I think what Iman was saying is in changeable conditions like Donny wets vs dry not different compounds. Casey should have run what the other guys were running to give him the best fighting chance(unless he's been talking to God and knows that its going to rain for sure).
Casey is a master in those kind of conditions and as Inam said he missed out in a really good opportunity and opportunitys like that don't come too often.
Yea yea but what if it rained etc etc!!! If was never the beginning of a true story. He made his choice and the race is over. End of story, lets all move along
No problems butting in, we all do it.
And yes, I know that Inam made the comment in relation to Donnington and have no doubt that he referred to changing conditions (or intended to). But the gist of my post is that people are making a simplistic comment that CS should do and choose the same tyre combination as his championship opponents, thus, my point is where does it stop?
And why just wet surfaces as surely the difference between hard/soft will also affect the outcome of a race just as readily as wet tyres vs soft slick (admittedly not as dramatically).
To me the other fact remains that some of the very posters in this forum have stated that they understand given the conditions at the time and those conditions arounds the track.
It is easy to say that a rider should come in and change tyres when their opponent does, but then the 'what ifs' come into play again and besides, some stay out to 'take a gamble' just as those that come in 'have gambled'.
Certainly a fit CS once pulled time in similar conditions, but CS himself says he was not and is not fit - so there is no way he would have pulled time anyway - he knew it and thus why he made the choice.
Gaz