Thanx for confirming, I thought we had all gone kooky bird. I was sure we all remember this rolling rulebook rule. Maybe MickDeez assessment that we are all ....... was a bit harsh, if not some bit of satire that has buzzed over all our heads, or maybe it's that we are senile old ..... with anesthesia (or did i mean amnesia)? At any rate, yes, see my above post, not sure why we're debating the freedom of riders (minus ONE) to speak their minds against vendors who enjoy cozy relationships with the shot callers. Perhaps Roman Emporer Fenati could shed some light on what may happen if you speak out against friends of friends. Though I will add, from one ...... to another, for .... sake, can we stop pretending that Mishitlin's executive predicted soft wets would delaminate? There is utterly no truth in it, why are we willing to entertain releasing Michelin from responsibility by rational-lying it's their fault for "gambling" because they didn't heed some phantom warning that the soft wets would fail. Michelin is pointing out they recommended the hards as optimal NOT that the soft option would fail less than half race distance! Why are their rider safety meetings, if supposedly we believe they will "gamble" with their lives on a tire Michelin knew would go Fukushima. It's .........
