Spies looked like he had it all weekend. I thought the analysis showed Sic probably had a stronger race pace, but once he was out, it was hard to imagine anyone catching Spies. Although I had to say the times Lorenzo was putting in post-crash were very, very impressive. He could've given Spies a run for his money if it wasn't for Sic.
Ah, Sic. I'd hate to write off such a bright talent, but you have to start wondering if he's going to learn. I don't think Honda will give up on him yet (as has been pointed out, it would appear that contractually they have no choice), but they may extend for one further season in the same capacity as this year. After all, who is an upgrade from Sic that they could fill his seat with? Bradl? I believe Crutchlow is already signed up with Yamaha for next season. My gut says they give him one more season to figure it out.
All that said, what a bonehead ....... move. As has been mentioned before, getting heat into the tires has been a problem all season and was exacerbated in Assen, first time on the left side of the tire, with 28 (?) laps to go, and knowing you have the same (if not better) pace as the leader, who only has a gap of about a half second. Yet knowing all that (or probably not, his track record indicates he doesn't think while on the bike), he still goes for it. Stupid, stupid ....... move. His worst of the season, and that's saying something.
As Tom has mentioned, that's a very positive start for Rossi and the GP12. From absolute zero they're only 30 seconds off. Compare that to the GP11 which was 30 second off on a good day, and was believed to be at the end of its development.
Always a pleasure, Migs...
It wasn't even those two cracking jokes, they were relaying what everyone in the paddock says about Sic. Most everyone in the circus seems to be in agreement that he's pretty thick and I think that says much more than a Toby and Jules joke.
Aussie weed must be spectacular.
Its not that good.......! More chemical enhancement here, or maybe none necessary
Just reviewing the times from last year and temperatures, massive differences which are obviously highlighting everyone's woes with heat and Bridgestone.
Assen 2010 - Track temp 48 degrees C
Assen 2011 - Track temp 16 degrees C
Ben wouldn't have made the top five last year with his race time last weekend, which was 26 seconds down on Jorge's 2010 time. With such a variation in temperature its not hard to understand Ducati's woes and their overall result being so close to one of the factory Honda's is more than likely quite encouraging.
Again this seems to highlight a serious lack of variation in tyre choice, in the past, there always was a solution in the range (or shipped in overnight
) for colder temps. And the result? Well Dorna and Bridgestone can count themselves lucky that no one was seriously injured from all of the opening lap crashes. Adding to the already long list of injuries this season, most of which are attributed to a tyre issue.
Thankfully Cal has spoken up, and now Jorge, obviously the riders are getting sick of playing the political game with Bridgestone, and Cals comparison to the WSBK Pirellis was rather negative for BS........saying that a 'the Pirelli's heat up straight away and don't last as long, making them much easy to set up' which is essentially the philosophy that needs to be implemented in Motogp once again, as Michelin also use to provide these attributes.
When considered, the current philosophy from Bridgestone is actually more than a little arse about, providing a Hard and Soft option, which are fairly similar in as much as they are notoriously difficult to heat and don't lose grip all race, if the team can actually get enough heat in them to find that grip that is........ What is the point of having compounds for all teams/bikes which last all race, therefore are difficult to heat to their sweet spot? What is becoming more glaringly apparent is that this rubber is providing little confidence for the majority and actually increasing the risk of crashes and serious injury. You have to wonder if they have a plan for more seriously difficult cooler conditions for the remaining races?
Maybe its a lack of History at the sharp end from Bridgestone? Not encountering enough variable conditions when their development/performance started to eclipse Michelin, a battle which actually was very short lived, 1.5-2 seasons. For as we know prior to 2007, Bridgestone was considered a serious liability as a tyre supplier, with extreme dynamics in performance, especially in 06 when Loris was either 10 seconds ahead or 30 seconds behind, and mainly poor/inconsistent results prior to this.
Extreme dynamics in performance.........nothing new from Bridgestone this season either, except they seem to be getting worse and costing the teams .... loads of cash trying to build bikes around their rubber, Not too mention costing the riders injury and poor results/no confidence-some of which we know are far better (Elias), and the sport is being robbed of any kind of racing spectacle.
From what I've read Bridgestone didn't want to be the sole tyre supplier, someone should have listened.