In a word - interesting.
So now for more words
The top 4 are, as one would expect again the top 4 irrespective of their respective machine changes.
But it is the remainder that are of interest and none moreso for me than Spies who has produced a performance that with the race has be feeling (well - confident) that he will be fighting the top 4 on a regular basis in season 2010.
The second point that seems to show up is that the 'factory supported' Tech3 is a majorly different bike to that of the 'Satellite bike' as Edwards is well behind the pace of Spies who is on the factory spec machine (if rumours when signed are correct). To me, the lap time difference here does reflect on the Toseland discussion of other threads as CEii is near 0.5 seconds behind Spies - an interesting discrepancy given the race results.
As for the rest, well teh rookies are about right as they need to learn and again we see Suzuki in need of a factory enema.
Ah well, lets see what future tests bring
Gaz
So now for more words
The top 4 are, as one would expect again the top 4 irrespective of their respective machine changes.
But it is the remainder that are of interest and none moreso for me than Spies who has produced a performance that with the race has be feeling (well - confident) that he will be fighting the top 4 on a regular basis in season 2010.
The second point that seems to show up is that the 'factory supported' Tech3 is a majorly different bike to that of the 'Satellite bike' as Edwards is well behind the pace of Spies who is on the factory spec machine (if rumours when signed are correct). To me, the lap time difference here does reflect on the Toseland discussion of other threads as CEii is near 0.5 seconds behind Spies - an interesting discrepancy given the race results.
As for the rest, well teh rookies are about right as they need to learn and again we see Suzuki in need of a factory enema.
Ah well, lets see what future tests bring
Gaz