- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,802
- Location
- Tuscany, Italy
Wait wait, u said they (Ducati) didnt do anything special for VR. Maybe u havent been paying attention the last 18 months, but VR results have been ..... Every change they have made has resulted in .... performance. Now suddenly VR/JB are geniuses because they made podium last event, despite a very good explanation why the circumstances created a perfect storm?
Ok, lets put ur theory to test. I believe the last time two Ducs made the podium was at Aragon. So we can say its a Ducati track. So lets make a bet, a little wager. Lets bar rain or any crashes/strange retirements by a prototype bike (except for Ducatis), if VR makes the podium again, i will declare u are right, "VR/JB are development genius". If he doesnt make the podium, u must declare i am right, "VR/JB are development morons." Bet?
Btw, i agree, i think if any improvements have been made, they are because Ducati made them. But more likely a departure from VR/JBs input. As all the inputs those two have made have resulted in .....
Jum, let me clarify to you (for the umpteenth time) that my point is not that Ducati doesn't do anything; it is that whatever they do, including moving heaven and earth as you like so much to say, is done for Ducati, not for the sake of Valentino Rossi (or of any other individual); maybe one day this simple truth will pierce through the thick layers of your preconceived ideas. Who knows.
Regarding the rest, it wasn't me saying that Rossi is a genius for interpreting a GP bike's behavior: it was Masao Furusawa who certainly knows better than me (and you) in this regard, and from direct and qualified experience. Maybe you should place your bets with him...?