The story on the website claims that Marco Melandri is the source. We only have the website's word that Melandri actually said any of these things.
There is that too of course.
The story on the website claims that Marco Melandri is the source. We only have the website's word that Melandri actually said any of these things.
I don't see how anyone with a rational mind can consider Lorenzo to be superior to Rossi, simply because he finished in front of Valentino in the points in 2010 after Vale broke his leg in half, and missed three races (and even when he returned, was riding injured!).
I'm not saying Valentino would or wouldn't have beaten him (we'll never know) if he hadn't broken his leg (or even injured his shoulder), but to claim that Lorenzo's superiority was proven due to last season is quite illogical. Especially when we view it in the context of the previous two seasons, where Vale consistently and clearly was better than Lorenzo.
I wouldn't be so sure of that. 'Clearly'? WRT Lorenzo, Rossi was disappointed that he took a pay cut when Yamaha asked him to, then all of that money went to Jorge. I don't think he fears any rider - and that goes for all of the top riders in this game. All of these top riders have an intense belief in themselves; they wouldn't be where they are if they didn't.
The story on the website claims that Marco Melandri is the source. We only have the website's word that Melandri actually said any of these things.
In 2010 Lorenzo was superior to Rossi. The WC says it is so. If you really want to discount this based on caveats then lets start dissecting Rossi's WC's on the same basis. How about year 1 of the 990's when most of the field were still on 500's and when a worthy competitor finally got a Honda 990 he beat Rossi. So are you happy to discount his WC as only one because he was the only one with a good bike? What about SNS?
The previous 2 seasons Lorenzo was a rookie and in his second year. Rossi had been in the top class for many years. I can not see how anyone with a rational mind can suggest that this had no bearing. When Lorenzo had sufficient experience he beat Rossi. In Lorenzo's rookie season he fell and injured him self several times. Based on your rational Rossi only beat Lorenzo because Lorenzo was injured.
How many WC's does a rider need to win before they are better then Rossi today? I would suggest that you confuse career stats for performance level now. Sure Rossi has 150 WC's but that does not mean that a rider can not surpass his ability in a current season.
Rossi prevented Stoner coming to Yamaha in 2007. Edwards was Rossi's personal tester for how many seasons? Rossi complained that Lorenzo should not get the bike that he developed and that Lorenzo should develop his own bike. Rossi forgets that he is an employee and he does not own Yamaha so as soon as Lorenzo challenged he offered an ultimatum and Yamaha reminded him that he was an employee and if he did not like it he could seek employment elsewhere. Suggesting it was just money is naive.
Until they change some of the ridiculous regs, then it will be ever-increasingly difficult for a smaller company to compete in this series, especially when the chief competition is making the rules.
It's fascinating that people think that Rossi is finished...
Basically, Rossi had these guys covered until he injured his shoulder, then leg. The Ducati does not seem to be in a great moment, so everyone concludes Rossi is finished. It's true, this is probably the lowest point of his career, but I think those who claim that his time is up, have a very short memory...The guy had almost completely dominated pre-season testing and only was a tad slower than Stoner at Qatar (Stoner/Ducati's most successful track).
I would love to see what Rossi would do against Stoner on the same bike. I'm not sure he would beat Stoner, but I'm not sure he'd lose either. I guess I just can't write a guy like Rossi off as easily as some on this board.
Sure, no doubt rossi was still pretty close to his peak at the start of 2010 prior to his shoulder injury, and won a race against jorge late in the year with shoulder, post broken leg and all. Jorge is pretty damn good though, and what surprised me in 2009 was that even though rossi won the championship handily and deservedly he had no answer for jorge at a few tracks, with jorge and team in only his second year seemingly even bettering him in setting up the bike at those tracks, something I thought I would never see.
What this year proves is that a bike that doesn't suit valentino's riding style exists (not that this is a point in favour of the bike concerned), and that much previous criticism of stoner's riding often by rossi fans would perhaps better have been directed at the bike, since stoner would now appear to have had little choice about how he rode the thing.
Commodore Ezpeleta better be polishing his cannons b/c if all of the swirling rumors are true, his sport is in dire straights. Rossi cannot remain uncompetitive. Honda cannot have a 1 second advantage over the entire field. Suzuki cannot drop out or finish dead-last on their 800. WSBK cannot continue to inherit GP talent; especially GP winning talent. Kids can't get stuck in Moto2.
Now you know what at least one of your questions to Marco will be in Brno.
Exactly. I intepreted some of kropotkin's sigh as reflecting all this. Rossi remaining uncompetitive apart from meaning ducati are no good under the current rules makes most of carmelo's marketing of the sport for a decade look silly, and if he is parachuted into a factory honda or whatever with any suspicion of undue influence the sport looks like wwe wrestling.
Melandri will be on holiday somewhere. He doesn't attend MotoGP events.
Hayden? If Yamaha built a more reliable bike that year Hayden wouldnt have been champ.
If you're going on experience, Casey won his first WC on his 2nd year in the big class, sure Jorge took the fight to Vale in his 2nd year but he didnt win. 2010 was different, it was looking like another great battle between the 2 but Rossi nailed himself and we didnt get to see the outcome.
Quit trying to put Rossi down, aye he's not the be all and end all, he's achieved some amount though, more than most ever will!
My conversation has been about how the others (Stoner Lorenzo Pedrosa) are better and has not been about putting Rossi down. Rossi can not be considered the best for ever. Rossi has also been around along time and has been politically active through out that time. The political activity has landed him where he is today. When others suggest that Rossi is still the best and indicate that no other rider will ever be able to be considered better I will argue against it. Sure perhaps no one will ever beat Rossi's stats but that does not mean that another rider on the track at the same time can not be a better rider. It is my view that there are at least 2 riders who are better than Rossi right now regardless of what bikes any of them are on. Stick the 4 of them on stock anything and at best I think Rossi would come third in the majority of races.
While the quotes do sound like something Marco Melandri would say, I'm not so sure about this rumor. But supposing Rossi did want to run his own team, he'd be smart to leave MotoGP behind. The Flamminis would probably give him a chunk of the action if he rode in WSBK, and his old Yamaha M1 (I meant R1) no longer has a factory team to support it. Rossi could line up 4-5 million in sponsorship and a SBK costs a fraction of MotoGP kit. Add in some kick backs from the Flamminis, bonuses from his personal sponsors who expect him to win, and Yamaha performance bonuses; Rossi would have a lucrative season riding a bike he likes.
I'm seeing less and less reasons for Rossi to continue swimming upstream.
The fuel-limited regulations are an obscure nightmare. I appreciate that Honda want to work on partial-throttle fuel efficiency, but most of the advancements are the result of mechanical innovations that will never be production relevant. When will cars or bikes have pneumatic valves, complicated zero-shift (or whatever they call it) gearboxes, and advanced back-torque clutches to help step the engines down from 18,000rpm in the most fuel efficient way possible? In light of CAFE 2025, do Honda really have the time or the money to continue chasing this rabbit?
Honda have a religious devotion to two things: 1. Winning 2. Preventing horsepower regulations (b/c that's how SBK works). Honda's religion is wrecking the sport. Even if MotoGP had 24L and 81mm bore at 1000cc, upstarts are not going to touch Honda. If they legalize variable intake and exhaust it would only move the "elite" engine builders farther up the road from the upstarts.
Commodore Ezpeleta better be polishing his cannons b/c if all of the swirling rumors are true, his sport is in dire straights. Rossi cannot remain uncompetitive. Honda cannot have a 1 second advantage over the entire field. Suzuki cannot drop out or finish dead-last on their 800. WSBK cannot continue to inherit GP talent; especially GP winning talent. Kids can't get stuck in Moto2.
My conversation has been about how the others (Stoner Lorenzo Pedrosa) are better and has not been about putting Rossi down. Rossi can not be considered the best for ever. Rossi has also been around along time and has been politically active through out that time. The political activity has landed him where he is today. When others suggest that Rossi is still the best and indicate that no other rider will ever be able to be considered better I will argue against it. Sure perhaps no one will ever beat Rossi's stats but that does not mean that another rider on the track at the same time can not be a better rider. It is my view that there are at least 2 riders who are better than Rossi right now regardless of what bikes any of them are on. Stick the 4 of them on stock anything and at best I think Rossi would come third in the majority of races.
Honda actually has failed to win the championship or constructors title for the whole 800 period. I doubt the Honda itself has a second advantage over the field. The riders might have something to do with it. Afterall, the Ducati now has a seamless shift gearbox just like the Honda.