This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Stoner's mental weakness

Scotty, you are way late to the debate and what you bring to it will just get you flamed. Stoner needs fans that are prepared to debate rationally in his favour not rant. Ranting is saved for the Rossi-boppers.



I however agree with you that Stoner is purely a racer. He is not a showman or a great communicator. It is his ability to race a motorcycle that draws his fans and his lack of ability as a showman and a communicator that attracts his detractors. Most of us have come to accept this.
 
Scotty, you are way late to the debate and what you bring to it will just get you flamed. Stoner needs fans that are prepared to debate rationally in his favour not rant. Ranting is saved for the Rossi-boppers.



I however agree with you that Stoner is purely a racer. He is not a showman or a great communicator. It is his ability to race a motorcycle that draws his fans and his lack of ability as a showman and a communicator that attracts his detractors. Most of us have come to accept this.



TP70…u say this… ‘and what you bring to it will just get you flamed’…wow that is str5ong words! Flamed by who?.. but in the same vain I am a longtime fan of Stoner & have followed gp’s since the early 70’s mate, I am rational & do not like to rant about aussie riders or such! And its and never will be because I’m an Australian & Stoner is too, I am objective but I predicted his success of 2007 way before he joined Ducati (all I said in lots of posts is…that this kid needs a consistent & top performing unit, then he will show everyone what he’s made of) that was when he was on the LCR (and everyone called him a ‘crasher’)…he got that with Ducati and Livio Suppo I think its time for him to go to the Repsol Honda…hes time at Ducati are numbered Stoner & Suppo are the team just like Burges & Rossi are and Burges and Doohan were
 
Scotty - Adriana wants Casey's .... back. Do you mind??



This season, up till last weekend, Casey couldn't ride the magical Duke like Nicky Hayden could. Everyone has their riding style/technique and not everyone can be fast on every bike. Just because he's quick on a Duke doesn't mean he can get any more out of a Yamaha than Jorge or Rossi. The Duke's characteristics suited the way he liked to ride. Noone else likes to ride that way. I actually think that is not a good thing. If you were a manufacturer, would you prefer a bike only one person with talent can win races on, or a bike that everyone with talent can win races on?



Would he be just as quick on another factory bike and not crash? We won't know until he gets on one again.
 
TP70…u say this… ‘and what you bring to it will just get you flamed’…wow that is str5ong words! Flamed by who?.. but in the same vain I am a longtime fan of Stoner & have followed gp’s since the early 70’s mate, I am rational & do not like to rant about aussie riders or such! And its and never will be because I’m an Australian & Stoner is too, I am objective but I predicted his success of 2007 way before he joined Ducati (all I said in lots of posts is…that this kid needs a consistent & top performing unit, then he will show everyone what he’s made of) that was when he was on the LCR (and everyone called him a ‘crasher’)…he got that with Ducati and Livio Suppo I think its time for him to go to the Repsol Honda…hes time at Ducati are numbered Stoner & Suppo are the team just like Burges & Rossi are and Burges and Doohan were



Ok mate go for it and see what happens. You are not on your own in predicting Stoner's success or being a long term fan so no kudo's here from me. It was obvious even to a casual observer that Stoner would be a success.



Interesting how you suggest you have said this in lots of posts. Not reflected in your number of posts so who were you before you were Scotty?
 
Scotty - Adriana wants Casey's .... back. Do you mind??



This season, up till last weekend, Casey couldn't ride the magical Duke like Nicky Hayden could. Everyone has their riding style/technique and not everyone can be fast on every bike. Just because he's quick on a Duke doesn't mean he can get any more out of a Yamaha than Jorge or Rossi. The Duke's characteristics suited the way he liked to ride. Noone else likes to ride that way. I actually think that is not a good thing. If you were a manufacturer, would you prefer a bike only one person with talent can win races on, or a bike that everyone with talent can win races on?



Would he be just as quick on another factory bike and not crash? We won't know until he gets on one again.



Who else with talent has won on the 800cc Duke (Capirossi won in 07 - who else)?



To answer the question though, I bet Ducati would rather have one person who can ride a bike to consistent victories than have two riders capable of fourth place finishes at best (thus far at least).











Gaz
 
Interesting how you suggest you have said this in lots of posts. Not reflected in your number of posts so who were you before you were Scotty?





+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000...........................

<




the guy is just registered today and has imidiatly gone to the 2nd page to bring back this article and talk about it. he says in his many posts
<
has said this many times.

Did you forget to comeback with your real id?



I didn't want to write anything in this thread, but this was the most funniest post of this thread and i had to bite.



Stoner and Rossi and Lorenzo are all, top racesers. I,m sure you would be a Rossi fan if you were Italian and Lorenzo's if Spanish.
 
It is his [Casey's] ability to race a motorcycle that draws his fans and his lack of ability as a showman and a communicator that attracts his detractors.

Unfortunately this is just not true TP... most of the "Casey detractors" main problem is that HE DOES NOT CONSISTENTLY LIVE UP TO his extremely high potential to race a motorcycle. There in lies the rub mate.
 
Unfortunately this is just not true TP... most of the "Casey detractors" main problem is that HE DOES NOT CONSISTENTLY LIVE UP TO his extremely high potential to race a motorcycle. There in lies the rub mate.

If that was the case then why de he attract so much hate in 2007 when he won 10 races and only just fell short of the highest points total in a season. I would say that was pretty consistent. Also he is still equal highest race winner in the 800cc era. Jeez I sound like V but on the other side!!! Either way Mick there are probably lots of reasons why different riders are liked and disliked. I like Stoner's lack of theatrical showmanship as much as I despise Lorenzo's display of it but that's just me. Each to there own.
 
Scotty, you are way late to the debate and what you bring to it will just get you flamed. Stoner needs fans that are prepared to debate rationally in his favour not rant. Ranting is saved for the Rossi-boppers.



I however agree with you that Stoner is purely a racer. He is not a showman or a great communicator. It is his ability to race a motorcycle that draws his fans and his lack of ability as a showman and a communicator that attracts his detractors. Most of us have come to accept this.



Lesson number 1... Listen to your mates Scotty! Spot on TP, but as shown: Lesson number 2... Go back and read Lesson number 1!



Tell Scotty not to get started with numbers please.



Who else with talent has won on the 800cc Duke (Capirossi won in 07 - who else)?



To answer the question though, I bet Ducati would rather have one person who can ride a bike to consistent victories than have two riders capable of fourth place finishes at best (thus far at least).



Gaz



Come on Gaz, you know you could lose that One Rider in a second! And then what do you have as a Manufacturer?



That first point aplies in Racing, but what about Sales? A fast Bike that everyone can ride also means lost more Sales because everybody can ride it (or though it would seem). A one man Rocket (not easy to hit that Jackpot often because other Manufactures will also catch up) means a lot of Sales get lost, take Capirossi and Melandri, and even though Ducati is Italian, they lost possible sales. I am sure Yamaha has sold many more bikes than they would have if only Rossi could have been winning in it since 2004. I know Yamaha may be doing crappy but that depends on Worldwide Economy and many more factors, still you cannot denny Lorenzo (and Even Edwards and Spies with no wins) have help sell M1s.



If that was the case then why de he attract so much hate in 2007 when he won 10 races and only just fell short of the highest points total in a season. I would say that was pretty consistent. Also he is still equal highest race winner in the 800cc era. Jeez I sound like V but on the other side!!! Either way Mick there are probably lots of reasons why different riders are liked and disliked. I like Stoner's lack of theatrical showmanship as much as I despise Lorenzo's display of it but that's just me. Each to there own.



I have been invoqued!!!
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
I'll step in with 'number' talk TP, cool... In 2007 (or by 2007) Stoner did not fall short in the Highest Total Points in Season, he tied up Rossi's 2005 with 367, only difference being 17 (2005) against 18 (2007) races per Season respectively, in average Points per Races is where Stoner felt short. Now this sounds like me!!! Sorry mate, I am down with Rossi's broken leg news.



Also I am sorry Rossi's numbers are stop in such a sad way
sad.gif
. Anyhow .... happens, the risk had always been there since the first GP in Malasia in 1996 with 229 Starts (169 x MotoGP/500cc, 30 x 250cc, 30 x 125cc) without missing a single race! Come on back 46, we are still waiting for that 105!
wink.gif
 
That's what I get for copying and pasting! Yamaha Racing, for Rossi and before Mugello, has "GP starts: 229 (169 x MotoGP/500cc, 30 x 250cc, 30 x 125cc)", which is wrong!!!
blink.gif




www.yamaha-racing.com



If Rossi has not missed a single race in Top Class (neither lower classes), then before Mugello it should be 230 with 170 in Top Class: 2000 = 16, 2001 = 16, 2002 = 16, 2003 = 16, 2004 = 16, 2005 = 17, 2006 = 17, 2007 = 18, 2008 = 18, 2009 = 17 (a canceled one), 2010 = 3. It all ads up to 170 plus the fourth in 2010 as a Not Starting one.
wink.gif
 
If that was the case then why de he attract so much hate in 2007 when he won 10 races and only just fell short of the highest points total in a season.

'Cause there are many haters out there... '07 was a great memorable season for me...



BTW it was that season that set the bar high for Casey's career and for me he hasn't been consistent since...
 
If that was the case then why de he attract so much hate in 2007 when he won 10 races and only just fell short of the highest points total in a season.

It wasnt hate for stoner, it was for the bandwagon fans (hundreds) that all of a sudden joined this place all spouting fanboy .... and attacking rossi fans rather than talk facts and racing. Just look how few are left now to prove this !



It was all stoner bla bla when we all saw how much faster the bike was down the catalunya straight. If that were true he would have also gained ground on the twisty bits rather than loose there only to re-gain it on the straight again. Stoner fans would not hear of it. The stoner hate started when he started winging and that was exacerbated by his over zealous fans. Where the .... were all of you before the 07 season ?? Most of you have never even been to a real gp using distance as your excuse. i have traveled 14000 miles to see a race before you ask.
<
 
It was all stoner bla bla when we all saw how much faster the bike was down the catalunya straight. If that were true he would have also gained ground on the twisty bits rather than loose there only to re-gain it on the straight again.



... Assuming that the Ducati and Yamaha were both equally good handling, rideable bikes... which all evidence suggests is not the case
 
... Assuming that the Ducati and Yamaha were both equally good handling, rideable bikes... which all evidence suggests is not the case

Well of course but the point being the real skill is in the twisty bits. Anyone can open the throttle down the straight, that's not the test of a great racer so for the fans at the time to claim he was the greatest and the new doohan just showed their lack of knowledge and proved there over patriotism and fanboyisum. That's why they caught so much flack and that's the bit TP70 has conveniently forgotten.
 
Well of course but the point being the real skill is in the twisty bits. Anyone can open the throttle down the straight, that's not the test of a great racer so for the fans at the time to claim he was the greatest and the new doohan just showed their lack of knowledge and proved there over patriotism and fanboyisum. That's why they caught so much flack and that's the bit TP70 has conveniently forgotten.



It's funny that this post is seasoned with the very things you are critisizing
 
Well of course but the point being the real skill is in the twisty bits. Anyone can open the throttle down the straight, that's not the test of a great racer so for the fans at the time to claim he was the greatest and the new doohan just showed their lack of knowledge and proved there over patriotism and fanboyisum. That's why they caught so much flack and that's the bit TP70 has conveniently forgotten.

Getting the bike through the twisty bits fast enough to take advantage of the straight line performance did appear to require considerable input from him though, to the extent that ducati felt the need to totally change the bike so riders other than stoner could ride it, with the result that they appear to have now designed a kawasaki.



At best he is now the new gardner, with aspirations to be the new schwantz, who was similarly afflicted in the main with bikes he had to over-ride to get anywhere. This still makes him pretty good.
 

Recent Discussions