<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Apr 26 2009, 07:16 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>He shouldn't have been in the field--previous. Lets put a mid-packer from 250's in MotoGP (the class you claim to have "the best riders in the world"), they will be prone to mistakes because they don't belong there, they haven't developed their racecraft, the mistake is evidence of that--today. Yes, any rider can make a mistake, they usually get a pass by virtue of their record that says they belong there. Can you make a case that Yuki belongs in MotoGP based on his past record? The 'past' part is the judgement, the present part being the mistake, indicates that the previous assessment is correct.
Simple logic, even an aspiring engineer should understand. Chronology, the big hand indicates minutes, the short hand indicates hours. Start there then work your way into understanding past and present events and how they related to eachother.
He shouldn't have been in the field, true, but I'm not sure that makes him more prone to mistakes than any other rider. He simply can't lap within 2 or 3 seconds of the best in the world but I'm not willing to state that this carries the necessary implication that it makes him more prone to mistakes.
Additionally, I disagree that he hasn't developed his racecraft. He has done many, many, many laps on various bikes, on many different circuits on almost every continent. Sure, he usually wasn't battling for 1st place, but maybe 5th or 6th. But it's stretching the point to say it was his lack or racecraft that took Nicky out.
He made a simple mistake that the likes of Dani Pedrosa et al have all made. Lack of speed does not necessarily imply that a rider will make many mistakes on a motorcycle.