<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrabbiata1 @ May 4 2009, 06:25 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>As I say, I originally postulated the, as you put it 'crappy crew' theory only for it to be buried in the Qatar thread. Since then it has been disinterred, resurrected and given a new life of its own. You'll know this Jarno because you responded to my original post.
As I said at the time it was pure speculation, but, Christian Pupilan and his crew do not strike me as having the necessary level of communication, and lack the bond between rider, bike, and team to be currently competitive. The Rossi/crew combination is obviously exceptional, as is the marriage between Stoner and his Gabarrini lead crew. The same sort of synergy exchanges between Pedrosa and Leitner, Lorenzo and Forcada, even RDP and his long term sidekick Christophe 'Beefy' Bourguignon. One of the many reasons that Troy Bayliss was so successful and comfortable at Xerox Ducati in WSBK was down to his relationship with Ernesto Marinelli - IMO he is a major factor towards Nori Haga's immediate success on the bike.
In short, there has to be an
understanding between rider and crew, and this is ultimately channeled through the crew chief. I'm not saying that Hayden has inherited a 'crappy crew', but I am saying that perhaps Pupulin isn't the best man for the job, and that the team do not function as a fluently as they should.
If we assume the chief man (or his team) are not up to the job, we are back to square 1: why should Ducati keep him/them after they failed to communicate/work properly with 3 top riders? Sheer masochism?
Or, reversing the scenario, is the team on that side of the Ducati garage suffering because their riders are regularly in deep .....? Not an easy mission for them, if really the bike is difficult for all but Casey... Bound to disappoint.