<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (krusty @ Feb 7 2008, 06:57 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>It is a stupid topic but I may as well throw in my two cents worth;
IF you want to compare Rossi and Stoner, you can ONLY compare them after their first two seasons in the premier class ... and that is all we can compare them on (as Stoner has only been there for two years) then their achievements are equal ... after two years they both had one premier class title! As other posters have stated ... if we are all here in a few more years we can make further comparisons! As at today ... we can't!
As for championships ... Valentino has five in eight years, Nicky has one in five years and Casey one in two years! Everyone else has sweet .... all!
As Jumkie says … drop the seven titles for Valentino ........! (He has five in eight years and that is a very enviable conversion rate and is better than the other two 2008 contracted riding champions) If we go down the seven titles for Valentino path then Pedrosa has three, Edwards two, Lorenzo three, Toseland two, Vermuelen one, blah, blah, blah!… WRONG! They have NONE like all the other riders on the grid (excluding the aforementioned riders). This is MotoGP and that is ALL that counts! I’d like to see someone try and argue that Max Biaggi wouldn’t trade his four 250 titles for one 500cc/MotoGP title … that would be a pointless discussion!
Rossi I known to be able to ride around problems, win races from the 10 place on the grid, chatter problems and so and so...and blah, blah, blah!
when I'll see Stoner do the same win races not on the fastest bike with grip problems and blah, blah, blah! then I'll say he is a good as Rossi!!!
I hope I wrote "not-a-pointless" thread
RIGHT???