Joined Aug 2009
958 Posts | 0+
One occasion is inconclusive. Surely you have more pictures.
You do take things to heart don't you.
Thought you might like the picture?, but then again, maybe not....
Rossi's own analysis is just dreamtime talk, a ........ attempt to portray himself as "old school" when in actual fact a good evaluation will show he is just as prone to idiotic histrionics as any of his current competitors.
Actually, in defence of Valentino, I like the way that he keeps his love life out of the media spotlight and away from the racetrack.
I desperately want Katja Poensgen to come out of retirement kids or no kids, so that Roger can wield a brolly next to her - (on a leash)
It would definitely be a mistake in regard to you as a rossi fan in particular, but not necessary all rossi fans, although I do probably get influenced by other sites like crash where things are more extreme.
I was upset live when the jerez incident happened because of the implications for stoner's championship, particularly since the move seemed so unnecessary, but I pretty much accept what rossi said on gpone, and that he may not even have really intended to pass; it was a bone head move rather than a dirty move in any case. I think stoner will still have his chance now if good enough, since there are contenders other than lorenzo and it fairly obviously won't be like 2008 with rossi, where to take points from him it is necessary to win, his worst result being second in a race you win. Part of my reaction was because I think stoner needs to take his chance this year while the going is good; like arrabbiata I think rossi will be hard to stop next year.
I then really got annoyed with the rossi fans who tried to make stoner the villain of the piece, when I think the reaction of most riders, and perhaps all riders actually in contention for the championship, would have been similar .
I have gone back fairly close to my former perspective ie acknowledging his greatness but wanting stoner to beat him. As when he was injured last year, I don't really like seeing him 4th or 5th.
Rossi has made a lot of mistakes, stupid moves and wrong decisions in his career. He is still my favourite rider. Schumacher is still my favourite f1 driver, Warnie my favourite cricketer (after gillie) tiger my favourite golfer. All are flawed,
I know you're desperate to disagree, but my chronology is fine (I've checked just to make sure), as is my assessment. If you care to read properly I was alleging not that Rossi was the victim of anything (I know, again, you're desperate to read that into what I was saying) but entirely the opposite in saying his comment was deliberate. Better luck next time old chap.Goaty, I had ignored this because I didn't want to bother that you are incorrect as to the facts. No sense debating if you are starting with an incorrect base. You may want to revisit what actually transpired. Use a chronological sequence, it may help you understand how this whole "....." thing actually became a talking point. You sound as if Rossi was the victim of journalist sensationalism. That, my friend, is not only factually incorrect, but your assessment would be wrong for obvious reason.
It really doesn't matter, its a bit like Austin said, it was funny when it first happened. now it certainly is being dragged on, but it didn't have the effect that Rossi originally intended, and now the target have actually taken the upper ground. Perhaps this is what is not enjoyable to you buddy?
Is that why they are punching people & crashing in flames?If there was a compelling reason to think so then I would, but right now as I stated somewhere else, the kids are going alright and he's under the pump.
Is that why they are punching people & crashing in flames?
Ooooh it sounds like a Moto GP press conference!!
AgreedThe punch WAS out of line, I think Rog got it spot on that Dorna are enjoying the circus aspect at present, with idiots like Butler stirring the pot it's going to hell in a hand basket!!!!!!!!!!!!
I've noticed how Rossi chooses his words carefully & uses the media with precision only when it suits an argument.