<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Babelfish @ Nov 15 2007, 12:02 AM) [snapback]100813[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
I agree with you there, most of the way. Meaning I got nothing to say about the riders. Melandri has been learning, and of course without TC Stoner would have had more to handle, but all in all I can't say they are midpack riders succeding only because of TC, not at all.
But TC make a difference. JT had problems with the TC on one of the later races this season and the bike tried and succeded to throw him off.
That clearly show that it does matter.
I don't disagree with you at all. I saw nothing wrong with the old 990 formula. I think superior traction control probably has given ducati an advantage this year. It is also true that young riders can improve as you say.
My point which was in reply to another post was that if you argue that a superior bike can make a midfield rider look like a top rider particularly in the era of tc you probably have to accept the converse which is that an inferior bike can make a top rider look like a midfield rider.
I agree with you there, most of the way. Meaning I got nothing to say about the riders. Melandri has been learning, and of course without TC Stoner would have had more to handle, but all in all I can't say they are midpack riders succeding only because of TC, not at all.
But TC make a difference. JT had problems with the TC on one of the later races this season and the bike tried and succeded to throw him off.
That clearly show that it does matter.
I don't disagree with you at all. I saw nothing wrong with the old 990 formula. I think superior traction control probably has given ducati an advantage this year. It is also true that young riders can improve as you say.
My point which was in reply to another post was that if you argue that a superior bike can make a midfield rider look like a top rider particularly in the era of tc you probably have to accept the converse which is that an inferior bike can make a top rider look like a midfield rider.