<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J4rn0 @ Feb 20 2008, 04:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I know he is a champ, but we are speaking of Qatar, not of the whole season, and that will be his first GP race ever... So speaking of this upcoming race, I doubt he can do better than experienced GP riders. Maybe I'm wrong, after all these new GP bikes are easier than the old ones, but so far we have never seen riders coming from superbike or similar arrive in GP races and shine immediately. We'll see. No doubt he will improve over the season and I would not be suprised to see him on the podium before the end of the season.
Bayliss ,in his first season in motoGP , DID shine immediately.
How about this:
Race 1: Suzuka- 5th
Race 2: Kyalami- 4th, after leading for half the race and dicing aggressively with Rossi over many laps mid-race
Race 3; Jerez: Missed pole by 0.01 secs and finished on podium . How about that!
2006 Valencia -as we all know; 2 years off a motogp Ducati and not familiar with Bridgestones- and gets a flag to flag win. If Ducati didn,t get lost in developing their 2005 bike, Bayliss would have been a championship contender.
I wish people would not continue with the superbike riders being inferior argument. Sure, there are more good riders in motogp, but a top superbike rider may be quite competitive in motogp. Its the learning of the tracks and adjusting to the new machinery that takes time.......
Is Toseland as good as Bayliss? I,m not sure, but he may end up doing better on gp bikes. All I am saying is don,t count him out.
Bayliss ,in his first season in motoGP , DID shine immediately.
How about this:
Race 1: Suzuka- 5th
Race 2: Kyalami- 4th, after leading for half the race and dicing aggressively with Rossi over many laps mid-race
Race 3; Jerez: Missed pole by 0.01 secs and finished on podium . How about that!
2006 Valencia -as we all know; 2 years off a motogp Ducati and not familiar with Bridgestones- and gets a flag to flag win. If Ducati didn,t get lost in developing their 2005 bike, Bayliss would have been a championship contender.
I wish people would not continue with the superbike riders being inferior argument. Sure, there are more good riders in motogp, but a top superbike rider may be quite competitive in motogp. Its the learning of the tracks and adjusting to the new machinery that takes time.......
Is Toseland as good as Bayliss? I,m not sure, but he may end up doing better on gp bikes. All I am saying is don,t count him out.