<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(michaelm @ Nov 30 2007, 02:51 AM) [snapback]102794[/snapback]<div class='quotemain'>
Dani at 7.00 looks like value.
I agree. If I put a bet down it would be on him.
Rossi is the obvious sucker bet. Yeah he's Rossi and he's got the Stones but there are way too many factors working against him for him to go off at 2.2:1.
Of course, no line has ever been made in accordance with actual probability since the dawn of time.
The only other name that looks appealing is Lorenzo. Suppose the following 2 things happen. 1) Michelin get their act together 2) Yamaha gets their act together. Lorenzo would be in the primo position to win. I don't know that he could do it, but if those two things (that aren't all that unlikely) happen, he will have only Hayden and Pedrosa in his way. Still a tall order, but it's a scenario that produces better odds than the ones he's getting.
Dani at 7.00 looks like value.
I agree. If I put a bet down it would be on him.
Rossi is the obvious sucker bet. Yeah he's Rossi and he's got the Stones but there are way too many factors working against him for him to go off at 2.2:1.
Of course, no line has ever been made in accordance with actual probability since the dawn of time.
The only other name that looks appealing is Lorenzo. Suppose the following 2 things happen. 1) Michelin get their act together 2) Yamaha gets their act together. Lorenzo would be in the primo position to win. I don't know that he could do it, but if those two things (that aren't all that unlikely) happen, he will have only Hayden and Pedrosa in his way. Still a tall order, but it's a scenario that produces better odds than the ones he's getting.