- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,802
- Location
- Tuscany, Italy
How is it possible that supposed MotoGP "fans" can conclude, in an 18 race season that a championship is won or lost because one rider couldn't execute one pass in one race against the fastest most determined rider in that race?
Rossi fans, and Rossi himself, should upset at Rossi for not winning more races or accumulating more points over the course of a season. If the logic is that one rider "cost" VR the championship, apart from Rossi himself, maybe then Pedrosa and Iannone should be enemy number one, for beating Rossi to a podium. Pedrosa being the reverse supposedly of Marquez crime, that is racing a contender so spirited, once, at one race.
These supposed fans of this sport, and Rossi himself, seem not understand not accumulating maximum points in round 1-9 has the exact same effect as rounds 10-18.
As usual you twist facts to suit your own endless rantatorials Jums... Try to listen to something different from the sound of your own voice now and then, you may discover little unassuming things called facts.
For example, Rossi does not say that MM's tactics "costed him the title": he says they costed him the possibility to fight it out with Lorenzo to the end. Maybe Lorenzo would have won anyway, but it would have been the fair outcome. This is what he says. Welcome to disagree, but not to distort it.
And again, while you are rather obviously right saying that Rossi could have won by just accumulating more points earlier -- you earn the Monsieur de La Palisse 1st prize with that, bravissimo! -- you give the lie to yourself in the same breath, since you always insisted that the title was rigged in Rossi's favor from the start and all the drama of his points battle with Lorenzo was just Dorna's soap opera... Priceless! :happy: