With all due respect, this is what is most amusing about this whole thing. Did you know that proof is most often never actually proven in a court of law? So much evidence, even if it was caught on video, people would be saying it’s a doctored video, its not real, bla bla bla. The acceleration is quite the visual outlier, but we are supposed to believe since there hasn't been any physical evidence discovered, it’s all just in our imagination, or worse "conspiracy"? Part of me thinks you are taking the diplomatic route because some how you may think that if you agree that the acceleration advantage accounts for his success that it can be somehow linked to CS 07 success. But sir, we are talking about a spec series here. That is an entirely different scenario. So please, feel at liberty to support in words what your eyes see on the track regarding Marc's acceleration advantage. Its a completely different situation.
The guy whilst getting every advantage still seems to be fairly good. Valentino rossi always seemed to have his path smoothed as well, sometimes perhaps even literally in the case of a certain grid sweeping incident, but this did not preclude him being also rather extremely good.
Marquez may well have an acceleration advantage; if you want to postulate he is getting a better engine by fair means or foul then that may well be the case. The hacked ecu thing just seems unlikely to me, as kropotkin also seems to think. Not that an ecu couldn't be hacked, just how much it would help and whether it would be detectable. The explanation given in the german article doesn't ring true to me, acknowledging my limited technical knowledge.
And yes I am trying to be fair because of casey stoner, and not because I am still worried about detraction from his 2007 title, but for the opposite reason, because many things said about him then and even widely accepted have now been proven untrue. I believe the default position should be to credit a rider's success, and I am surprised if you are different given attitudes to nicky's championship in 2006. Btw, I have always recognised that stoner clearly did have a straightline advantage in 2007 particularly early season, just one that was impossible to utilise unless you were him and could somehow get the pig of a thing through the corners by his unique method. It has since emerged that at the track where he had the most pronounced advantage, which was either turkey or china, yamaha had a gearing problem which limited performance on the straights. It also seems to be now widely accepted (which by my own argument doesn't make it correct) that stoner's riding style helps straightline performance because of the manner and speed of his corner exit.
I can see that there might (and I do say might) be legal factors giving marquez a straight line advantage, including his particularly diminutive size ( he is even smaller than dani pedrosa which is said to give dani a straightline advantage), and possibly elements of his riding style. I believe they are actually proposing a combined bike and rider weight limit in moto2, and weight would be expected to have more influence with a low performance spec engine than in the premier class. I don't even know the engine rule in moto2 which I don't follow closely, but if there is no limit on the number of engines perhaps his well resourced team can push their engines harder and replace them more frequently, or test out more engines to find particularly good ones as production engines do vary. There is also perhaps a vague possibility that they can use design elements such as aerodynamics to give the bike a straightline advantage at the expense of stability/handling, with marquez able to overcome the handling problems; something similar may have contributed to stoner/ducati in 2007.
That said, sure it is a spec series, and with the evidence of him getting off the reprimand for the stupid practice crash perhaps dorna might be prepared to overlook cheating on matters technical. I don't think there is any evidence that they have ever done this previously for anyone though, although as you know I am not averse to conspiracy theories myself about them doing things to disadavantage competitors, specifically casey stoner, such as lex's 2008 tyre conspiracy (changing the tyre that year, not the control tyre which followed in 2009) and to a lesser extent them changing the bike weight and tyres for the current season at a late stage to disadvantage honda and stoner, concerning which you were quite sceptical at the time as I am about the marquez hacked ecu thing. I still think they were not keen on stoner or honda winning this year, but perhaps those changes were made for good reasons other than stopping stoner, or honda deserved it or whatever as many have argued.
(EDIT Centrally supplied randomly allocated sealed engines I believe. Similar rules for tyres in wsbk hasn't stopped speculation that some competitors get more equal tyres than others though).