<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Sep 3 2008, 07:02 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I think they are both "primo donnas". How quickly people forget the facts and
sweep the dirty little deals under the rug. Danny's switch is obviously dastardly to do it mid season. But Rossi's switch was orchestrated by the governing body because of threats and strong arming (probably just like Peders presently); however, Rossi's threats precipitated threats by Dorna to propose a control tire (as we know now it was just a bluff) that
coerced Bstone into supplying him
ONLY. But here is the .... of it all,
other riders wanting the Bstones were impeded and denied that request. Now I ask you (and keep in mind, I can't stand Pedrobot) would the championship look different had Dani got his Bstones at the beginning of the season? Well its speculation, but I think it would have. Confidence does a lot, and Dani is fast enough. So in essence (again, I hate the little ....), but in essence, he was denied the best chance to (at least in his mind) while Rossi got his placebo
ONLY. Who the hell here is gonna argue that this is an even playing field? .... even when the field was in love with Michelin, it is well a an accepted fact (in the circle of reality) that Rossi got the best of them. Get over it, Rossi has the clout to make changes that other are denied, and that is what happened again but this time it was their second son Peders, period!
Now go count your titles and ASTERISK in this .... for the record.
I have no problem rehashing this debate. I kicked all of your ..... last time who defended the decision and ran to Rossi/Dorna's side, and I can do it again.
Careful what you wish for compa.
Hey Jumkie are you actually in Alaska?
This whole disscussion is old I don´t want to rehash it but have to reply to some of your comments.
First, there is a difference between pressuring a company to get the results you want while you are in a bussiness contract and jumping ship before the contract was up. Rossi change is simply more valid then Dani´s at it´s face value. As for the one tire issue, this year it´s on very ones lips, all the teams all the riders all the commentators and all the magazines. So why is Rossi the bad guy just for figuring out the whole problem first. Needless to say the pressure he put on Michelin last year he also put on Yamanha recall that now, at EVERY race, the head of Yamaha racing is in the boxes. Rossi, like all riders, will do what he can to win. I don´t think that´s wrong. I have an issue with Dani switching mid season when he is clearly in no condition to callange the leaders, thus having a testing advantage over other riders who many make the switch in 2009. Dani won´t have to eat up race time finding the best set up, but other riders will (just like Rossi at the beginning of the year) this is unfair to say the least.
As for the whole Dani could be winning ideia I find it very hard to believe. Stoner is just as fast and much better at passing then Dani, and of course Rossi would be up there too. The thing is that Dani likes to pull away from the pack, not fight head to head, but even if he had the BS at the start of the season he would still have to fight, something his is not great at. This year he crashed out pushing his bike to the limit to keep his advantage so I don´t think he would be up top at all.
By the way, I never said that Rossi didn´t have clout. Of course he does! The man is on the rider safetly commity and he is a 5 time World Champ. If that isn´t enough to give you clout and get you noticed I don´t know what is. However, Yamanha is not Mommy honda and Fiat is in no way equal to Daddy Repsol.
Glad to know our feelings regarding Dani are mutual!