3407351358333196
So Mr Cuckoo, let me see if I understand this correctly.
Lorenzo is unworthy (in your eyes) of being called the champion as he was beaten by Pedrosa (and of course Stoner) in the latter stages of the season.
Now, if what you say is correct, may I ask you whether Pedrosa was even worthy or deserving of being in the position to compete against Lorenzo given that Pedrosa has for a number of years now in MotoGP been consistently beaten by Lorenzo, Rossi, Stoner and the occasional other?
Iy you assert that of course Pedrosa was worthy, than please, in 500 words or less explain what the difference between Pedrosa's performances up until the 2nd half of 2012 and that of Lorenzo during the 2nd half of season 2012 is that makes one worthy and yet the other not?
Thanks you in advance and I await your response
MH, and other MiniPuig man fans, this is NOT an attack on Pedrosa so please do not see it as such . Thanks