<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Jun 19 2009, 06:12 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>F1 MUST differentiate from the current sport and away from the manufacturers.
Hate to break it to you, but with Bernie and Max in control, you'll never see any of this. Plus, with the FOTA series, F1 is dead anyway. You have a choice of watching Ferrari or Manor Motorsport, who are you going to choose?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Here are my F1 wishlists:
Spec engine - F1 commissions the schematics then contracts with someone like Cozy to make engines for the non manufacturing teams who can't find an engine supplier. Manufacturers can build the spec engine using their own facilities. 3.6L V12s with a 14,000 rpm redline so they go 3,000 km between major rebuilds. About the same peak output of today's V8's but with much more usable power. Unlimited exhaust, lubrication types, and radiator designs, intake.
You've been drinking the IRL kool aid haven't you? F1 is about technology, not spec engines. Plus, a V12 with 14000 rpm at 3.6 liter is a ....... huge race engine. Not a chance in hell will a company build an engine like that that is in anyway affordable. Current engine deals are about 10 million, this engine formula would easily double that.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>
1 Transmission - 6 speed sequential manual, transmission specs given to the governing body at race 1. Teams who cannot find a supplier get a spec Cozy transmission.
Cosworth does not and has never built their own gearboxes. Again, cost will go through the roof as now, with a spec engine and other spec rules, you have a team that is willing to spend tens of millions on transmissions, effectively making a spec engine pointless.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>
Spec Tire - Michelin,
Spce fuel,
spec ECU - no TC or very limited TC, several fuel mappings
Tire - Already in place with the Bridgestone rules.
Fuel - fuel is not a major issue in F1. There are a few fuel providers in F1, but their are so many rules in place, regulating it, that spec or no spec makes no difference.
ECU - Already in place. Mircosoft and McLaren spent over a year developing it.
TC - My love of technology says keep it, but it is about the driver, not the car.
Fuel Mapping - Already in place. F1 technology is at a level that MotoGP engineers can't even understand.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>
Spec wings - less downforce
Why not make it a spec car, as team's will just work around it. Unless you restricted the under tray and sidpods.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>
Spec Engine F1 commissions the design then contracts with Cozy for teams who can't build or find supplier. Manufacturers can build the spec engine in their own facilities. 2.4L V6 rev limited to put out about 550hp+ and make at least 1,500 km.
Was the current F1 idea. Cosworth were that new engine supplier.
This engine would get blown away by a GP2 car, and that is not what Bernie and Max want with F1.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>
1 Transmission - semi auto paddles, the transmission specs are given to the governing body at race 1, teams who can't build their own or find a supplier get a spec Cozy transmission.
Again, team's will spend tens of millions, effectively making the idea of spec parts pointless.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>
Spec tire - Narrower or harder Michelin,
Spec fuel,
Spec ECU - very limited TC, several fuel mappings
Why Michelin? Narrower tyres won't make a difference. Was proposed in Nascar (10 inch wide tires to 8 inch) and was told by race engineers that they could adjust around it and have no major dropoff in times or car handling.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Drastically reduce width (1.4m or less), reduce length but set min cockpit dimension. Drastically reduce allowable min weight to 500kg with driver (a lot of F1 cars already weigh much less).
Light cars cost money. If anything, you'd raise the weight to benefit the heavier drivers (Kubica, Raikkonen).
Smaller cars will not do much benefit unless your planning to run much of the schedule on street circuits (was the reason Champ Car went with a narrower machine in 20070.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>FOTA wishlist:
1. Top Speed limit
2. Spec Fuel
3. Spec Tire
4. Min/max dimensions similar to current F1
5. Spec wings
6. No other rules.
The FOTA governing body builds 2 boxes (1 big, 1 small) with the approximate look they want the car to have. If the chassis fits inside the big box and doesn't fit in the small box, it can be raced. Of course, they would use an actual box, it would all be done on computers.
What? Why a top speed limit? Unless it a 180mph limit, it does not make much of a difference, as most F1 cars reach about the same top end (within 4-5 mph). It is not like bike racing where there is as much as 10-15 mph top end speed.
Return to the rules of 2005-2006. Technology at it's best.