This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dorna run a fair competition.(Or do they)

All good but debatable points, however if (hypothetically) they're all true, why did they not result in more championships for VR ?

Because he wasnt racing against Gibernau as his main competitor the last 10 years. No amount of rigging would allow Rossi to outright beat riders like Stoner, Lorenzo, and Marquez in a season. . Now its all about just keeping Rossi relevant
 
But while we are on 2008 how about Stoner requesting the tyres from 2007 instead of the new ones that he didn't like as much but being denied for really no reason(well no good reason)as the rules permitted at the time.
 
I will never know why Stoner was unpopular, as his talent was just sublime, I know he'll never come back but what a bad miss his absence is.

He beat Rossi badly, removing the veil of invincibility that surrounded him and has never been forgiven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Debate them then please...[emoji1]

Why, the thread isn't about those in particular, as I said in my original post, the series is not rigged at all, it may have been too sarcastic for some but the point was quite easy to see.
 
He beat Rossi badly, removing the veil of invincibility that surrounded him and has never been forgiven.

Especially as they mostly brushed off Hayden's title as "Lucky". No such excuse could be made for 2007.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Why, the thread isn't about those in particular, as I said in my original post, the series is not rigged at all, it may have been too sarcastic for some but the point was quite easy to see.

For a guy that likes Dani, you really do get defensive if/when people question Rossi .


These guys are throwing points out there that you say are debatable but refuse to debate them?


I will add money plays the pivotal role in why the sport is the way it is (in terms of why it is managed in a somewhat questionable manner at times)

Rossi is worth huge dollars to DORNA as he is their effective cash cow, the basket in which they have thrown all of their eggs and as such, the basket who has a significant amount of power.

If Rossi fails, DORNA cash flow drops and suffers and as such the need that Golden Goose to remain relevant and above all, competitive within the sport so it is done with sublety such as minor rule changes, changes to specifications of tyres, suppliers, and what not.

Of course, none of this guarantees a Rossi win and that seems to be your whole argument, that just because Rossi does not win does it not demonstrate that the sport is fair ......... well no. Lance Armstrong did not win all races in which he competed and yet he was found to have an illegal advantage, as was the cyclist recent found with a motor in her bicycle frame, she did not win. Alternately, let us look at soccer/football as a further example as many of the higher teams (Manchester United for one) will get favourable decisions on the field (ie. penalties) where a lesser side will not when the offence is the same, as the profiles are vastly different.

Rigging (if that is the right word) is not always about winning as were Rossi to win all races, the viewership and dollars would fall as people who are not associated with VR will leave, so it is a fine balance between overt and covert (again, not sure that they are the right words). Instead, with MGP as with lots of sports etc, where you have a high profile athlete or team it is about relevance, whilst they are relevant the income for the rights holders is high and the rights holders only care for the dollar, not the sport

One thing to remember is that the benefits that may be received may not be deliberate either but may be consequential of the decision (I am confident that most referees do not actively favour ManU but give benefit of doubt that way and so on).

For me, as I have said elsewhere I am not so sure MGP is rigged so much as it is focussed on only one person and as such, that focus can be seen to influence decisions made
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Especially as they mostly brushed off Hayden's title as "Lucky". No such excuse could be made for 2007.

Exactly, they knew Haydens title was mostly an anomaly, with Stoner it was obvious for everyone to see there was a new force in GP. Rossi and his mutant fanbase immediately went into run Casey Stoner out of GP mode, and to a certain extent, they were successful. I will never forgive either for robbing the world of the best bike racer ever, and will never forgive Dorna for being complicit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Gaz , I posted the thread because I just see all the negativity on here which is specifically aimed at VR , often for no good reason. People try to negate his achievements by say he only got them because of favouritism and nothing to do with being talented, which he and all of them are. Yes he has had tantrums and indulged in unnecessary mind games. In that he is no different to many other sports people, footballers in particular, high talent high money, high ego and highly strung.
I should add at this point that I follow Moto GP first and foremost, without Rossi (riding) it will move on and stay successful.
I suppose I wanted people to realise that, just as it's not cool to jump on the 'bopper' bandwagon, it's equally as uncool to constantly gripe and moan at one rider WHOEVER it is!
As for refusing to debate, it was more about keeping this to the original topic, which is doomed to failure anyway so...
1 Rossi did deserve his return to Yamaha, he won FOUR championships for them so that was always going to be a consideration!
2 In his time at Ducati he was usually the first one to the line!
4 I can't remember the other points of debate, I'll have to go back and read them again!
 
Gaz , I posted the thread because I just see all the negativity on here which is specifically aimed at VR , often for no good reason. People try to negate his achievements by say he only got them because of favouritism and nothing to do with being talented, which he and all of them are. Yes he has had tantrums and indulged in unnecessary mind games. In that he is no different to many other sports people, footballers in particular, high talent high money, high ego and highly strung.
I should add at this point that I follow Moto GP first and foremost, without Rossi (riding) it will move on and stay successful.
I suppose I wanted people to realise that, just as it's not cool to jump on the 'bopper' bandwagon, it's equally as uncool to constantly gripe and moan at one rider WHOEVER it is!
As for refusing to debate, it was more about keeping this to the original topic, which is doomed to failure anyway so...
1 Rossi did deserve his return to Yamaha, he won FOUR championships for them so that was always going to be a consideration!
2 In his time at Ducati he was usually the first one to the line!
4 I can't remember the other points of debate, I'll have to go back and read them again!
I take your point as an individual who seems fair minded, and personally agree that his achievements were not due to "rigging" and largely on the basis of his talent and effort.

This forum is a very tiny corner of the Internet, however, and the overwhelming narrative out in the wider world is that Lorenzo won his 3rd/5th title by deceit, and he and MM being widely vilified, as were Hayden and Stoner previously for honestly won titles resulting from their own talents and efforts. You will have to forgive me and others on this forum for feeling that VR and his fans have less to complain about than several other riders and their fans.

Whether or not he deserves absolute hatred on the basis of it, I and others entirely disagree with VR's self-serving and destructive narrative concerning the 2015 season which rather seems to be ongoing.
 
Last edited:
I take your point as an individual who seems fair minded, and personally agree that his achievements were not due to "rigging" and largely on the basis of his talent and effort.

This forum is a very tiny corner of the Internet, however, and the overwhelming narrative out in the wider world is that Lorenzo won his 3rd/5th title by deceit, and he and MM being widely vilified, as were Hayden and Stoner previously for honestly won titles resulting from their own talent and effort. You will have to forgive me and others on this forum for not feeling that VR and his fans have a lot to complain about. Whether or not he deserves absolute hatred on the basis of it, I and others entirely disagree with VR's self-serving and destructive narrative concerning the 2015 season which rather seems to be ongoing.

You won't find me belittling the other guys achievements, as that's just as wrong as what all the demonizing of Rossi is. However last year even made me sit back and say " What the hell are you doing " and I will never say that was anything but bad style!
 
Last edited:
Gaz , I posted the thread because I just see all the negativity on here which is specifically aimed at VR , often for no good reason. People try to negate his achievements by say he only got them because of favouritism and nothing to do with being talented, which he and all of them are. Yes he has had tantrums and indulged in unnecessary mind games. In that he is no different to many other sports people, footballers in particular, high talent high money, high ego and highly strung.
I should add at this point that I follow Moto GP first and foremost, without Rossi (riding) it will move on and stay successful.
I suppose I wanted people to realise that, just as it's not cool to jump on the 'bopper' bandwagon, it's equally as uncool to constantly gripe and moan at one rider WHOEVER it is!

All good and no foul has occurred

I follow MotoGP for the bikes, and the skills shown and have less time for the personalities involved (being the public shows) than I have time for my mother in law to whom neither I or my wife have spoken for 9 years ..........

You won't find me disparaging what VR has achieved as irrespective of whether he did or did not get a leg up, he still has to be consistent enough to score more points across a season than all other riders for that year ........ simple. He has to be both consistent and fast enough which even were he to have advantages (not suggesting either way), means he still has a job that has to be done and 7 times in the top class he has done so.

What I do not go for is the fact that he has been placed onto a pedestal by the organisers of the sport and as such is seemingly untouchable with criticism amongst the internet followers (and if you review my comments over years, you will see that I suggest that anyone with the power of teh pedestal who did not use it, is frankly a fool).


As for refusing to debate, it was more about keeping this to the original topic, which is doomed to failure anyway so...
1 Rossi did deserve his return to Yamaha, he won FOUR championships for them so that was always going to be a consideration!

But past .......... Hayden won a championship for HRC but that did not guarantee his longevity with HRC

Plus, Yamaha (the racing team) were said to not have wanted him back as the split was somewhat acrimonious but the Marketing team who hold the purse strings got their way (and based on timings, Carmello's comments were to say the list, coincidental)

But that said, you do not lose the innate skills he has so I fully understand why he returned to Yamaha, I may not agree with it and may have suspicions about some aspects, but do not blame him for taking the chance

2 In his time at Ducati he was usually the first one to the line!

One could well argue that this is how it should have been as he was (sorry Jums) a significantly better rider than his team mates and those riding the other Ducati, plus Ducati had made him a priority and thus, anything less just added to the failure

4 I can't remember the other points of debate, I'll have to go back and read them again!

No joking here but don't bother as most have likely been done to death and will only extend that which seems to upset or cause the anxiety - that being accusations of favouritism/rigging.

But I will again say this for you to hopefully show where I stand.

I have reasons for not liking the public persona of Rossi (experience of friends who officiate) but I also do not blame him for using any power that he has (real or perceived) to better himself in the sport and I do mean better himself as ALL of these guys are there for themselves first, second and thirdly. I do not dismiss that which he has done in the past to SNS, Turbo'd bikes or whatever but I do take umbrage that all of those riders who have challenged him have been questioned by media and fans .

My issue is that he has been allowed, nay encouraged to become the higher deity of the sport and has been provided with a high pedestal from which to preach to his disciples, but again, were any rider to be given the opportunity they would be foolish not to accept it.

The issue is that all of the eggs are now in the one basket, and that basket is to precious and worth to much to the organisers to allow some of those eggs to spill.

But, between Green light and chequer, if he rides well and fairly then I will give credit, but after the chequer I would much rather hear another song by damn Adele than hear the publicity drivel that will be spewed forth by near ALL who are interviewed (I do enjoy the non political correctness of some)

I actually suspect that our views are closer than may be realised with regards to the 'hatred', but as Mike has said, this place is but a very small part of the internet and whilst it may currently seem to be hating on VR , it is also a place with some excellent experience and knowledge of teh sport and participants, present and past
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Hilarious how the usual noobs come here whining about the treatment of VR on this forum, yet you'll never see them go elsewhere and complain about how every other rider is treated while VR is held up as an idol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Hilarious how the usual noobs come here whining about the treatment of VR on this forum, yet you'll never see them go elsewhere and complain about how every other rider is treated while VR is held up as an idol.

Glad you find it amusing, always brings a smile to my face when others get joy from things I do.
 
He beat Rossi badly, removing the veil of invincibility that surrounded him and has never been forgiven.

I dont believe Stoner has many true fans outside of Australia. He's not a very likeable fellow but his countrymen get him because he personifies Ozzy blokes.
Most people that like him only do so because they hate Rossi.
 
Exactly, they knew Haydens title was mostly an anomaly, with Stoner it was obvious for everyone to see there was a new force in GP. Rossi and his mutant fanbase immediately went into run Casey Stoner out of GP mode, and to a certain extent, they were successful. I will never forgive either for robbing the world of the best bike racer ever, and will never forgive Dorna for being complicit.

Regardless of the reasons he left, in the end he quit while riding the fastest bike on the grid, capable of winning multiple championships and commanding one of the paddocks highest salaries.
Its quite a reach believing he was somehow run out of the sport.
Since when does Povol not believe in personal responsibility
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Gaz , I posted the thread because I just see all the negativity on here which is specifically aimed at VR , often for no good reason. People try to negate his achievements by say he only got them because of favouritism and nothing to do with being talented, which he and all of them are. Yes he has had tantrums and indulged in unnecessary mind games. In that he is no different to many other sports people, footballers in particular, high talent high money, high ego and highly strung.
I should add at this point that I follow Moto GP first and foremost, without Rossi (riding) it will move on and stay successful.
I suppose I wanted people to realise that, just as it's not cool to jump on the 'bopper' bandwagon, it's equally as uncool to constantly gripe and moan at one rider WHOEVER it is!
As for refusing to debate, it was more about keeping this to the original topic, which is doomed to failure anyway so...
1 Rossi did deserve his return to Yamaha, he won FOUR championships for them so that was always going to be a consideration!
2 In his time at Ducati he was usually the first one to the line!
4 I can't remember the other points of debate, I'll have to go back and read them again!
Your wrong on point 1 he did not deserve his return.

Stoner fully deserved his factory ride in 2011 after working very hard on a satellite Honda and winning on his duc.

All other duc riders have been washed up since including other world champs, melandri, Hayden, Rossi.

On the basis of rossi's form on the duc, dovi ( also a world champ ) should have a factory yam ride next year as he has had 7 podiums in two years.... Rossi got 3.

Also spies got obsolutley f....d over in 2012, with breakdowns. When was the last time you ever saw a swing arm break in MotoGP.

Motor home meetings rule
 
Your wrong on point 1 he did not deserve his return.

Stoner fully deserved his factory ride in 2011 after working very hard on a satellite Honda and winning on his duc.

All other duc riders have been washed up since including other world champs, melandri, Hayden, Rossi.

On the basis of rossi's form on the duc, dovi ( also a world champ ) should have a factory yam ride next year as he has had 7 podiums in two years.... Rossi got 3.

Also spies got obsolutley f....d over in 2012, with breakdowns. When was the last time you ever saw a swing arm break in MotoGP.

Motor home meetings rule
That Rossi deserved his return is purely a matter of opinion, also that he's washed up which it is plain to see he is not.
Dovi, a good rider but not in the alien group by any means.
Spies I really thought he would do better but I guess it kind of proves that a great superbike rider does not necessarily become great in GP , shame really as the US could do with someone in world championship racing.
 

Recent Discussions