<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Andy Roo @ Aug 16 2008, 01:08 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Hey Babelfish.
You ever been to India?
This is what I was talking about and I’ve cut and paste the numbers so you can read them.
This is from FP2 in Laguna
Sequence 1 is a
14 lap sequence from Casey
128 1'22.563 21.767 17.022 19.146 24.628 255.4
29 1'21.826 21.540 16.911 18.969 24.406 250.3
Sequence 2 is an
8 lap sequence from Valentino.
17 1'23.210 22.109 17.134 19.174 24.793 256.8
18 1'23.206 21.844 17.184 19.201 24.977 257.3
19 28'46.768 P 23.850 17.743 19.507 27'45.668 252.6
I did a little more back checking and there are a lot of these in dry races (FP2 was dry at Brno)
And there is tracks where they dont. First of all, consider that Brno is a lot longer than LC.
Then check out Mugello, Catalunya, China portugal.... and you won't find any of those doing anything near 12-13 laps (adjusted to Brno track legth)
In fact Rossi has a maximum of 10 laps including in and out lap and had that twice but both were on much shorter tracks. That would transfer to 7-8 laps at Brno. Rossi did a 7 lap stint.
Lets get some more numbers: Average
maximum length stint in FP2 between Rossi and Stoner this year are 7.8 That is not adjusted for the legth of Bruno that should easily bring it down to about 6-7 laps adjusted for Brno. You might now realize that Rossi's 7 laps are spot on or above average maximum length during FP2.
You use Stoners mega 15 lap stint at LC as "proof" while you should have observed that he had two stints before that without any fast-laps at all, wasting lots of time and despite his long stint had the fewest laps by a margine. Add to that, you won't find anyting even close to that from stoner on any other track. I'd call that unusuall. in statistics that's a typical anomality that you would exclude to get a more reliable result as it is way outside the norm.
In other words there is absolutly no hold what so ever in your wild theory based on stint legth as it is perfectly NORMAL.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Look, you don’t really like me because (IMO)
a- I am an Australian
b- I am a Casey fan
BUT at least I can count.
I had no disliking towards you until now. NOW you forced me to look into the numbers to actually prove my point with indisputable facts and going through all the results take a lot of time. Wasted time as I was right from the start. So now I dislike you for being a stubborn ....... that CAN NOT COUNT and or are using more than a little speculative number to "prove" your point. Either you are so dumb that you can't see the difference betweeen a long and a short track or you are willing to overloock that fact that your numbers just arn't comparable. Take your pick.
Your Aussi/Casey thing is spreading as a common problem amoug your fellow nationals. Blame it on casey. Jeezz that is just so incredably pathetic.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>What I said is speculation but you’ve not debunked that one little bit.
I'll leave that to others to decide.
I think your numbers talk as clearly as only numbers can, but in the right perspective that is.
So to sum it up it looks like that was pure speculations based on anything BUT facts.