- Joined
- Jun 26, 2007
- Messages
- 9,515
- Location
- Norah Head
I think the word you are actually looking for is the most dominate season, not the best season. The best season would imply that the races have never been better in any other season. And was that the case? no. And your argument that it was the most dominate was disproven on page one. There is 5 more points for a win and three more races a season. Not to mention everyone of his competitors had problems except him. Nothing dominate or best about that. Quite lame actually. But I guess when you are old and senile trying to remember anything things from more than a couple hours can be difficult.
Full points for posting proof you are as thick as two bricks
1. The word you are looking for is dominant, not dominate. Which made your post ridiculous to read.
2. All you have done is interpret the thread title and my reason for posting it
Its a question open for discussion, in the hope of identifying those "extraneous" inputs as to whether a season has been dominant or not.
Your argument that every one of his competitiors "had problems" is idiotic as it can just as easily be applied to every competitor in every season. The fact remains that they had their problems trying to keep up with Lorenzo ( with the possible exception of Pedrosa, who had a purported equipment failure )
I have seen nothing that disproves whether or not it has been the "best/most dominant/whatever", all you have to see is a picture of Rossi's arse and you are happy, but it takes something different to prove or disprove what the season was to me.
The question still remains ....... the "other competitors" this year ......... if they are that good, then surely it makes Lorenzo's achievement even more "dominant" or "better". Perhaps given the competition, and what competing against him caused them to do, Lorenzo's season can be seen as good as Doohans?