Best season of all time .... ?

best season cant be 2010

wins,points,podiums,etc

#99 had the luck

and not just 1 alien missed some rounds & had some off's injury's etc but 3 of the Aliens had plenty of bad luck across the season



#99 did the best this season so well done Jorge





From the Haydenittes,pedroboters,stonersexettes,and the RossiLuscious Troopers

so there Fixed it for ya'll u know you wanted to say it

Jumkie said:

If you ever get a chance, rent the 92 season review. You're gonna be a fan of that season as well.

Click to expand...

Agreed, i've got it at home (ebay is a goldmine) and with the season review making it seem so good i can't imagine how good it would have been at the time

BarryMachine said:

It was to the Stoner fans and many others, and to the pundits, and by the alltime best scores at the time as well. Just not to the Rossi Boppers like you

Another idiotic post, is Rog. tutoring you

Click to expand...

Like im sure most member's here would, i take that as a complement coming from you.

Jumkie said:

The only number I'm interested at the moment is your age and IQ. Both very small.

Click to expand...

dont ignore my question mr Garrison,

what did you find of all those Rossi's records?

Were ("those only numbers") as much fact and great and good as Lorenzo's or not? Didn't you ever bitched about them?

Barry started this thread,for fishing, or he doesn't want to admit to himself, that most posts here, while are appreciating Lorenzo's efforts, dont believe that this season is the best ever, or rather naming the best is a matter of taste or such. (Even Jumkie thinks so)





Ben Spies said: except 3 gp's all the year is been boring?

now go ahead and call him, boper. Or ask yourself can we have "The best ever" thing together with "Boring" thing in the same catagory?

rossiofsky said:

Barry started this thread,for fishing, ...



Or ask yourself can we have "The best ever" thing together with "Boring" thing in the same catagory?

Click to expand...

The two most vocal about BM fishing was you and Talps. Why would that be? uhm.....



When people use the word "boring" what they mean is the lack of close racing. One of the seasons a few peeps are saying was the "best" was 1997. (Which I would disagree with because of lack of parity, but anyway....) So to answer your elementary sized insight of a question, perhaps the season with the least close racing is one your buddy Talps said was the "best". In their terms, it would have been the most "boring" season since infact it was devoid of close racing. I know you and Talps are joined at the hip, but you might want to have a meeting, since you two speak with one voice. So here, you now tell us 2010 was boring, therefore not the best. Haha You really do sound like Talps, who Googled the numbers for 97 and declared that season the best. That is before he realized that not all bikes with the Honda sticker were the same. Yes, and oddly enough, the next best rival also missed 4 races, very similar to 2010. That rival incidently was on the same team, and stood on the podium much in the same manner as Lorenzo's teammate. Oh, but saying this one is among one of the best, despite the parallels...well that's just fishing, right?

Jumkie said:

When people use the word "boring" what they mean is the lack of close racing. One of the seasons a few peeps are saying was the "best" was 1997. (Which I would disagree with because of lack of parity, but anyway....) So to answer your elementary sized insight of a question, perhaps the season with the least close racing is one your buddy Talps said was the "best". In their terms, it would have been the most "boring" season since infact it was devoid of close racing. I know you and Talps are joined at the hip, but you might want to have a meeting, since you two speak with one voice.

Click to expand...

Epic Fail-again



Never said it wasn't the greatest, clown!!



I said Mick's 1997 was the most Dominant, and should be considered truly great. And if you actually had watched it-which we know you haven't other than on some review DVD yet you feel the right to enlighten us on it, you would have seen Tadi give Mick a really good run fight at some of the rounds. On a very similar machine.



I said that its a toss up between 2006-2001 as the most entertaining. But of course I have never announced a 'best' season as its an impossible task.



Also I can't help but note that we are 10 pages in and no-one has answered yes to my simple question, thus underlining my original opinion of this thread.



This one even pushes your obsessive need discredit Rossi and disagree with his fans on all levels, to new heights of insanity-attempting to discount the achievements of Michael Doohan to prove a completely irrelevant point whilst stating ridiculously that Jorge's seasons is 'among' the best, while in a debate about 2010 being 'the' best season of all time. Rather invalid isn't it.......



We know already!!! You hate Rossi fans, at least try to come up with intelligent and relevant retorts against us.......

exactly, it's the lack of close racing, anyway and opposite to what some fans expect of a best racing season.

What is exactly "lack of parity" a new one again, let us first learn the other ones like "Race Etiquette"

Jumkie said:

The two most vocal about BM fishing was you and Talps. Why would that be? uhm.....



When people use the word "boring" what they mean is the lack of close racing. One of the seasons a few peeps are saying was the "best" was 1997. (Which I would disagree with because of lack of parity, but anyway....) So to answer your elementary sized insight of a question, perhaps the season with the least close racing is one your buddy Talps said was the "best". In their terms, it would have been the most "boring" season since infact it was devoid of close racing. I know you and Talps are joined at the hip, but you might want to have a meeting, since you two speak with one voice. So here, you now tell us 2010 was boring, therefore not the best. Haha You really do sound like Talps, who Googled the numbers for 97 and declared that season the best. That is before he realized that not all bikes with the Honda sticker were the same. Yes, and oddly enough, the next best rival also missed 4 races, very similar to 2010. That rival incidently was on the same team, and stood on the podium much in the same manner as Lorenzo's teammate. Oh, but saying this one is among one of the best, despite the parallels...well that's just fishing, right?

Click to expand...

Of course wrong again, as I've already said.



record is still broken.......



So as 1997 was only 15 rounds long, and 2010 is 18 rounds long, it is clear that Mick Doohan is well ahead on wins, points-basically everything, So he has the most Dominant season in the modern era.



No one is proclaiming that 2010 is the most entertaining, or the best, or the most dominant........so WTF are you on about? Whats your point? What is the best season ever for the messiah of Motogp (est.2006) ??

Talpa said:

Epic Fail-again



Never said it wasn't the greatest, clown!!



I said Mick's 1997 was the most Dominant, and should be considered truly great. And if you actually had watched it-which we know you haven't other than on some review DVD

yet you feel the right to enlighten us on it, you would have seen Tadi give Mick a really good run fight at some of the rounds. On a very similar machine.

Click to expand...

Your logic is truly a case study in Schizophrenia. Your premise to BM's question (remember that little symbol that looks like this> "?") Was to say it was absurd to even consider this season great, yet now you backpedal by saying 97 was among the greats but not the greatest? So why can't you accept, given the similarities between those two seasons that Lorenzo's cannot be in that category, as you now but it, a list of greats but none being the greatest?



As I'm sure you went to all the rounds right? You are gonna now try to make a case that there was really more close racing than we know? Haha, Tadi, yes, perhaps at Donny, being the most memorable, but that was rare, about as rare as the number of times we can say 2010 delivered close racing.

Also I can't help but note that we are 10 pages in and no-one has answered yes to my simple question, thus underlining my original opinion of this thread.

Click to expand...

Yes, that is the point, debate; but your first reaction was to dismiss the thread right, because its just (to use your 13 year old buddy's words) "fishing" on BM's part.

This one even pushes your obsessive need discredit Rossi and disagree with his fans on all levels, to new heights of insanity-attempting to discount the achievements of Michael Doohan to prove a completely irrelevant point whilst stating ridiculously that Jorge's seasons is 'among' the best, while in a debate about 2010 being 'the' best season of all time. Rather invalid isn't it.......



We know already!!! You hate Rossi fans, at least try to come up with intelligent and relevant retorts against us.......

Click to expand...

This is so typical of how you operate. Any introduction of profound analysis of the facts must be "hating". Tell me, was Rising Sun also hating since he schooled you on the reality that was the 97 season? Was he discounting Doohan? Or am I the only one discounting and hating? Hahaha. You etal just can't stand to hear some of the realities that surround the sport and its respective seasons, that's why you have dug your head into the sand about an exclusive agreement that Rossi enjoyed with Michelin. But in the same breath screamed about Stoner's Bridgestones and how Rossi deserved them. You can't imagine a person filtering the reality and politics of the sport but still being able to appreciate its contestants for what they bring in regards to talent. You've label anybody who doesn't suck on Rossi's .... a hater, but I'd advice you to come up for air, as the lack of it will surely continue to kill brain cells, of the few you have left.

rossiofsky said:

exactly, it's the lack of close racing, anyway and opposite to what some fans expect of a best racing season.

What is exactly "lack of parity" a new one again,

let us first learn the other ones like "Race Etiquette"

Click to expand...

Take your time little buddy, I know big boy concepts are difficult for you to understand.

Talpa said:

Of course wrong again, as I've already said.



record is still broken.......



So as 1997 was only 15 rounds long, and 2010 is 18 rounds long, it is clear that Mick Doohan is well ahead on wins, points-basically everything, So he has the most Dominant season in the modern era.



No one is proclaiming that 2010 is the most entertaining, or the best, or the most dominant........so WTF are you on about? Whats your point? What is the best season ever for the messiah of Motogp (est.2006) ??

Click to expand...

So let me get this straight, according to you its ludicrous to consider 2010 among the greats, but at first you said 97 was the greatest, but now its not, its just among the greatest?



I don't think the question was, which is the most dominant season, I think he asked, which was the "best", a more ambiguous term to be sure. I consider 2010 to be among the greatest because it revealed and exposed alot about what many people believe to be the STANDARD of MotoGP, that is Rossi. It revealed what other seasons had not, it revealed what has been masked, that is, put the man up against equal machinery and tires, and he gets beat. This of course was too much for him to handle, and decided to move on. So 2010 is among the greats! Let us call this season 2010: THE MYTH BUSTER SEASON!

rossiofsky said:

Ben Spies said: except 3 gp's all the year is been boring?

now go ahead and call him, boper. Or ask yourself can we have "The best ever" thing together with "Boring" thing in the same catagory?

Click to expand...

2010 ^ this Spies is gonna get outed now

Jumkie said:

The two most vocal about BM fishing was you and Talps. Why would that be? uhm.....



When people use the word "boring" what they mean is the lack of close racing. One of the seasons a few peeps are saying was the "best" was 1997. (Which I would disagree with because of lack of parity, but anyway....) So to answer your elementary sized insight of a question, perhaps the season with the least close racing is one your buddy Talps said was the "best". In their terms, it would have been the most "boring" season since infact it was devoid of close racing. I know you and Talps are joined at the hip, but you might want to have a meeting, since you two speak with one voice. So here, you now tell us 2010 was boring, therefore not the best. Haha You really do sound like Talps, who Googled the numbers for 97 and declared that season the best. That is before he realized that not all bikes with the Honda sticker were the same. Yes, and oddly enough, the next best rival also missed 4 races, very similar to 2010. That rival incidently was on the same team, and stood on the podium much in the same manner as Lorenzo's teammate. Oh, but saying this one is among one of the best, despite the parallels...well that's just fishing, right?

Click to expand...

it took you a while before you got it, since you changed your post/bs a bit after my reply.

Yes haha, you discovered finally that i didn't rate this year, as the best ever. indeed haha

I say Ben thinks this is the best season ever in motogp despite having found most races boring.(actually he does so, but because he is racing in it)

For me there were some boring races, but not too many, though i dont rate this season as the best because of the lack of competition. Of cource that wasn't Lorenzo's problem and his championship is deserved. and like i said in a few pages ago, i still will find Lorenzo's achivement(a new record), a great accomplishment for the sport and his fans, but still imo 2010 isn't The best ever. Now go ahead and call it hating Lorenzo.



btw, you didn't answer my question. Did you explain to our new member about the times you respected and cared for the records of Rossi, or those records are still "only numbers" ?

Pigeon said:

2010 ^ this Spies is gonna get outed now

Click to expand...

Jumkie said:

Take your time little buddy, I know big boy concepts are difficult for you to understand.

Click to expand...

Thanks for the time.

Jumkie said:

I don't agree with many of your opinions, but I'm stunned that I had the same thought about Rainey 92.

Click to expand...

See, I am not such a bad guy.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20B4Dvk_9cY

Talpa said:

We know already!!! You hate Rossi fans, at least try to come up with intelligent and relevant retorts against us.......

Click to expand...

+1

Talpa said:

Of course wrong again, as I've already said.



record is still broken.......



So as 1997 was only 15 rounds long, and 2010 is 18 rounds long, it is clear that Mick Doohan is well ahead on wins, points-basically everything, So he has the most Dominant season in the modern era.



No one is proclaiming that 2010 is the most entertaining, or the best, or the most dominant........so WTF are you on about? Whats your point? What is the best season ever for the messiah of Motogp (est.2006) ??

Click to expand...

Exactly like in last gp, where no one in the media talked about Rossi's pass on Hayden, but only Messiah knew that it was out of order and put an etiquette on it, "Race Ettiquette" .anyone?

povol said:

Is that not what makes any superstar, the fact that they outclass the competition. Say what you will about Wilt, even in the waning years of his career, the big man still averaged 18-19 rebounds a game against some pretty well known players in NBA history. There are plenty of 7'1" inch players who have never come close to averaging half of what Wilt did. He wasnt just tall, he was a physical freak of athletic mobility and strength that made his height that much tougher to deal with.

Click to expand...

I am not knocking Wilt or Lorenzo....both season are impressive and will be ranked up there in all time seasons. My point is Wilt and Lorenzo did not have to fight or push for their results every race/game. They played against themselves....and that may have held them back from doing even more since they did not have that extra push/motivation to go harder in the games or races.