<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Feb 18 2009, 02:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Your question asks how many meters in a pound. I've said very plainly, so even you can understand, that 250 titles, no matter if they were 50 years ago or 5 years ago, are still minor leagues. They are NOT the pinnacle title therefore are NOT as valued. The 250 rider, while there has been a premiere class, has never been perceived as the top rider unless he was the big bike champion. WTF, don't you understand?
You really don't have a clue do you?
In those days the championships stood out on their own. Riding an 80cc or 125cc had very little in common with 500cc. I'm not the one comparing two different measuremnets, it's you makeing different championships into the hunt for only one.
I agree that to a large degree 125 and 250 today is feeder series to MotoGP but it has not allways been like that. To say that was true 30 years ago you would also have to set up the stupid "pinnacle" in every major branch of sports. 100m in athletics, dowhill in skiing, soccer in ball sports and so on.
All other athlets winning anything in the related sports are hardly worth mentioning, right?
Because that's just how different these classes once were.
You really don't have a clue do you?
In those days the championships stood out on their own. Riding an 80cc or 125cc had very little in common with 500cc. I'm not the one comparing two different measuremnets, it's you makeing different championships into the hunt for only one.
I agree that to a large degree 125 and 250 today is feeder series to MotoGP but it has not allways been like that. To say that was true 30 years ago you would also have to set up the stupid "pinnacle" in every major branch of sports. 100m in athletics, dowhill in skiing, soccer in ball sports and so on.
All other athlets winning anything in the related sports are hardly worth mentioning, right?
Because that's just how different these classes once were.