It's Bernie's circus, and he's the one demanding the massive sanctioning fees.
As I understand it, Texas HAS ponied up $ to support the track. Didn't the Major Events Trust Fund already loan a wad of cash to this clusterfuck outfit? Sure, it's supposed to be payed back, but if the whole mess falls on its face....
Nope, major events trust says they will give them the cash AFTER they have a successful race as an offset to tax revenues and Bernie's 'massive' sanctioning fees are the same as for anywhere else - $25M.
Now on the face of it, $25M sounds like a lot of money - it is a lot of money, but you need to look at where that money goes. Mostly it goes to the teams, to be able to travel to the venue and race. It goes to the GP emergency services, to be able to travel to the circuit and erect their comprehensive medical facilities. It goes to paying for the provision of data services, telemetry, all the other shared services that the teams require. It goes towards prize money. Most importantly for the actual race itself, it goes to stewards, race direction, scrutineering, FIA support, fuel provision and testing, etc. (the guys that Hamilton did out of a job on Saturday
)
Without that $25M in sanctioning fees, we would be at the mercy of the race promoter to provide all that stuff. How well do you think they would manage that? Why does F1 run so smoothly? Because they bring the whole show to town. Their tech guys have ensured that the facilities for the teams are right - from garage sizes, power hookups (all 240V), parking, data, lighting, access, safety, ambulance, helipads, the location and access to emergency services (hospitals, police, etc.) - the track builder and local promoter gets a 8-inch-thick book of specifications to ensure that they are working to put together the same facilities in every venue. That's why they used someone like Tilke - they helped write the specifications.
So arguing that it is Bernie's 'massive sanctioning fees' that is the reason for the ticket cost ignores totally the actuality of putting on a global sports event such as F1. Once the promoter has his track built and has paid his $25M, he doesn't have a whole lot else to shell out. It's not a bad deal, really.
As an example, they sold 300,000 3-day tickets at Montreal last year. They sold 245,000 4-day tickets at Melbourne. They sold 175,000 3-day tickets at Monaco. They sold 230,000 3-day tickets as Silverstone. The general admission prices in 2010 (no seat) were: $96, $195, $200, $210
So that's 100M worth of sanctioning fees for $159,875,000 in ticket sales alone.
So why can I go and see a race in Shanghai or Kuala Lumpur for under $70? Because the government in both countries puts on the race and pays the sanctioning fee. Malaysia gets back the sanctioning fee in hotel tax, food and drink alone. We tried to find a hotel for my son at the last Malaysian Grand Prix - he wasn't going to the race, just travelling through - prices were 50% higher than usual and nothing available within Sepang or the Airport - there are about 40-50 large hotels in that area. Until we looked in KL city itself, there wasn't a bed to be had.
F1 generates massive amounts of money. I don't think you would find many promoters that would agree to go 'user pays' instead of paying the sanctioning fee.